• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • msnbc.com sites & shows:
  • TODAY
  • Rock Center
  • Nightly News
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • Morning Joe
  • Hardball
  • Ed
  • Maddow
  • Last Word
  • msnbc tv
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech & science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: In debt or jobless, many Italians choose suicide
  • Recommended: Carnival-like atmosphere in Myanmar ahead of election
  • Recommended: Hermaphrodites push for human rights in Germany
  • Recommended: For Palestinian farmer, a constant reminder of Israeli occupation
World Blog provides a dynamic look at world events and trends from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world.
  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 15
    Dec
    2011
    2:28pm, EST

    NBC's Richard Engel answers your questions about Iraq

    After nearly nine years of war and occupation, the final U.S. troops left Iraq Thursday.

    Richard Engel, NBC News' Chief Foreign News Correspondent, covered the war from the start. Earlier today he answered reader questions about the U.S. withdrawal and what it means for the future of Iraq.

    Please replay the chat below to see his responses.

    Recent reports from Richard:

    Post-U.S. Iraq: Welcome to Shia-stan 

    Today Show video: U.S. troops leave Iraq


    This chat is moderated, as many questions as possible will be answered.

    9 comments

    As an old guy, I remember our troops pulling out of Vietnam - "job complete - well done." A couple years later, the South Vietnam Army collapses. Are we likely going to see the same thing in Iraq?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, live-chat, richard-engel, u-s-withdrawal
  • 14
    Dec
    2011
    9:26am, EST

    Post-US Iraq: Welcome to Shia-stan

    By Richard Engel , NBC News' Chief Foreign Correspondent

    Hadi Mizban / AP

    Children play next to Shiite posters and flags in the primarily Shiite neighborhood of Hurriyah in north Baghdad on Nov. 15, 2011. The number of Iraqi neighborhoods in which members of the two Muslim sects live side-by-side and intermarry has dwindled.

    ANALYSIS
     
    BAGHDAD – It was a cold night in Baghdad. I was standing on the roof of Saddam’s information ministry listening to a televised speech by President George W. Bush. He gave Saddam Hussein and his sons 48 hours to leave, or else.

    I remember the chills that went down my legs, as if I was bracing myself for an impact. A big war was coming. The American military machine had risen and was ready. 

    This past Monday, on another cold night in Baghdad, I listened as President Barack Obama said the war is ending. Troops are leaving. This war is wrapping up. I had those chills again, but on this night, it was just from the cold.  

    So much has changed since the war began. So many U.S. troops have made this the mission of their lives. Nearly 4,500 of them died in a war launched to find weapons of mass destruction that didn’t exist and to topple a dictator who had nothing to do with 9/11 or Osama Bin Laden, even though that’s how it was sold. 

    Saddam was brutal. He had no regard for the lives of his people. He buried his enemies in mass graves. Stalin was his hero. Saddam’s son, Uday Hussein, was evil, psychotic and, by many accounts, a rapist. But Iraqis have lived through absolute hell during the war – an estimated 150,000 of them have died, mostly at the hands of other Iraqis, according to some Iraqi government estimates. 

    Regardless of President Bush’s intent in waging this war, what it wound up doing is replacing a dictator with a Shiite-run state that is close to Iran. This could not have been the plan.
     
    Welcome to Shia-stan.

    Shiite revenge
    On April 9, 2003, as a few hundred Iraqis pulled down a statue of Saddam Hussein, the crowds weren’t cheering for America. They were shouting the name al-Sadr, a Shiite cleric killed by Saddam. Pulling down Saddam’s statue was vengeance for al-Sadr’s murder. It was Shiite revenge. Saddam was a Sunni. Sunnis are a minority in Iraq, yet they had ruled the country for over a thousand years. 
     
    When Saddam was hanged in December 2006, one of his executioners yelled the name “Muqtada,” in his ear moments before the dictator dropped through a trap door and a noose stretched his neck.  Muqtada is al-Sadr’s son. He is a radical anti-American Shiite cleric. Saddam’s execution – carried out on the day Sunnis were celebrating one of the year’s most important holidays – was more Shiite revenge.
     
    When Iraq held its first elections, Shiite political parties won. 

    Now, as American troops leave Iraq after almost nine years of patrols, IEDs and countless meetings with tribal elders, it is abundantly clear that the Shiites have won this country.
     
    Haifa Street in Baghdad has long been a Sunni stronghold. It was once considered the most dangerous street in the world. Snipers from al-Qaida in Iraq – a Sunni militant group – would fire on U.S. troops from Haifa Street’s tall buildings during the height of sectarian violence in 2006- 2007. Al-Qaida’s all black flag hung from some of the windows. 

    A few days ago, I was back on Haifa Street to meet officials at the High Council for Tourism. The black al-Qaida flags are gone. Instead I saw dozens of pictures of Muqtada al-Sadr and green Shiite flags. Outside the building, there were more Shiite flags and pictures of the Shiite martyr Hussein. 

    I was at the tourism office to find out who is coming to Iraq and what they are coming to see.

    It’s an especially holy month for Shiites, the month that marks Hussein's martyrdom in the 7th century. The country does have ancient sites, including Babylon and the Ziggurat of Ur – so perhaps they are a lure for tourists? But more tourists are coming to visit Iraq's Shiite religious sites.

    The tourism official is like most government officials in Baghdad these days.  He’s a religious Shiite from one of the many Shiite political parties. He served our TV crew sweet tea in small hourglass shaped cups. 

    Ahmad Al-Rubaye / AFP - Getty Images

    Iraqi Muslim Shiites hit themselves with swords during Ashura rituals in Baghdad's Sadr City on Dec. 6, 2011. Ashura mourns the death of Imam Hussein, a grandson of the Prophet Mohammed.

    When I looked closely, I noticed three words were engraved on the cups: Allah, Mohammed and Ali. Including the name Ali, Mohammed’s son-in-law, has only one meaning. Ali is the patron of all Shiites. These were Shiite cups.  Even the tea at the tourism authority was being served in Shiite cups. 

    Several Sunnis at the tourism authority have recently been fired, they believe because they are Sunnis. Iraqi Shiites are clearly not shy about showing off their newfound power.
     
    I asked the official who is visiting Iraq these days. Under Saddam, it was nearly impossible to travel to Iraq. And Iraqis, if they were allowed to leave, had to drive to Syria or Jordan to catch most international flights. Baghdad simply wasn’t connected to the world. 

    Now there are direct flights here from Turkey, Sweden, Austria, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates, among other countries. There are no direct flights to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, both Sunni states that have been critical of Iraq’s Shiite government. There are no direct flights to the United States.  But there are now on many days more than a dozen flights to Iran. 

    Officials at the tourism authority told me that they registered more than 1.5 million Iranian visitors to Iraq in 2010, up 25 percent from the year before. This year they expect the figure to rise to 1.75 million. The official stressed that the tourism authority only registers Iranians coming to Iraq in organized tour groups, but many more Iranians come on their own.

    Iranians are issued visas when they arrive at Baghdad International Airport. They can also land at the new international airport in the Holy Shiite city of Najaf and quickly get a visa on site. American citizens have to apply for visas in advance and they usually take three weeks to process.
     
    When I landed at the airport in Baghdad on this visit, I had to wait about 15 minutes while my visa was verified. It’s a standard procedure. For years, I’ve seen this arrival hall packed with the oddest cluster of misfits imaginable. There were beefy American contractors in baseball caps, cargo pants and with badges around their necks. I’ve seen Americans arriving in Baghdad with big silver belt buckles and cowboy hats, too.  There were often British security contractors with tight t-shirts and Oakley sunglasses perched on top of gelled crew cuts. There were also small armies of sub-Saharan Africans hired to man American checkpoints and guide bomb-sniffing dogs.  And there were journalists with leather satchels, checkered scarves and long hair (usually the photographers).  

    This time, nearly every person in the arrival hall was from Iran.  From the badges hanging around their necks, it was clear they were on tours to visit Iraq’s holy Shiite shrines in Najaf, Karbala, Baghdad and Samaraa.  The Iranian tour guides wore fedora hats.
     
    So Iranians are coming in huge numbers. It doesn’t mean that Iran is taking over. Iran is, after all, Iraq’s neighbor, and Iraq can use the tourist dollars. But it certainly does show the direction Iraq is leaning and with whom Iraqis are connecting.

    Related link: A growing Iranian threat, in wake of U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq this month

    Green Shiite flag city
    For most of the nearly six years I lived and worked in Iraq, our bureau was in the Jadiriya neighborhood. It is a relatively upscale part of Baghdad with clothing stores, a supermarket and a decent ice cream parlor. There were many bombings in Jadiriya, but compared to other areas, Jadiriya was relatively peaceful. Jadiriya was always a Shiite neighborhood, but there were Sunnis and Christians mixed in too.  Now the Sunnis and Christians are invisible. These days, there are more green Shiite flags in Jadiriya than I’ve ever seen.
     
    About 65 percent of Iraqis are Shiite. If people want to express their religion, it is certainly their right. Americans couldn’t prevent it even if they wanted to.  But in Iraq, hanging flags isn’t a sign of religious celebration. It is a way to mark territory. It is a way to show dominance, like Marines landing on a beach and raising a flag to say: this is mine.
     
    South of Jadiriya is the neighborhood of Dora.  Dora has long been a Sunni area, with some Shiites and Christians. The Christians and Shiites have now mostly moved out. They were driven away by al-Qaida in Iraq or opportunists who used the terrorist group to scare away their neighbors so they could buy their houses on the cheap.  If you were a Sunni in a neighborhood like Dora and you wanted your neighbor’s house, and your neighbor happened to be a Shiite or a Christian, all you had to do was slip a threatening note under his door and sign it “al-Qaida in
    Iraq.”  The neighbor would usually accept any price for the house that was offered. 

    Ali Abbas / EPA

    Iraqi actors perform the epic of Imam Hussein, as part of the Ashura festivals in Baghdad, Iraq, on Dec. 6, 2011. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Shiites visited the holy city of Kerbala throughout the Ashura week to mark the death of Imam Hussein, grandson of Prophet Mohammad.

    War does ugly things to people. Greed and hate and cynicism bubble up to the surface.  I drove past Dora the other day.  I noticed a new set of houses being built nearby. The houses are still under construction, but on each one was a green Shiite flag and a picture of the Shiite Martyr Hussein. Some Shiite developers have obviously decided to encroach on Dora. They’re moving in. It’s a Shiite settlement. 
     
    As I drove on from Dora, I kept thinking, sectarian violence is going to blow up in Iraq again. Many Sunnis feel they have no future in the country. 

    Related link: Iraqi voices weigh in on the U.S. withdrawal

    Cozy relationship will have U.S. national security consequences
    But, cynically, does anyone outside of Iraq care anymore? My friends in the United States have long stopped asking me about Iraq. They don’t want to hear about it.

    Friends used to like it when I would draw maps on cocktail napkins to show how Sunnis and Shiites are divided and how Iran moves in supplies to help Shiite militias. Now no one wants to see my maps. Most people seem to think if Iraqis want to kill each other, it’s their problem. 
     
    Aside from the cost of this war in blood and money to the United States, a Shiite-led, Iran-friendly Iraq could have major consequences for American national security. 

    Saddam Hussein was a secular Sunni dictator. He despised Iran. Saddam fought a war with Iran in the 1980s in which each side lost a half million men. Saddam let the world think he had nuclear weapons to keep Iran in check.

    How times have changed. Iran now has both a close ally in Iraq and a key trading partner. Just look at the taxis in Iraq, which used to be old Volkswagen Passats manufactured in Brazil. Now, many of the yellow taxis choking Baghdad with traffic are boxy Iranian-made Saipas.  Iran is building an oil pipeline to Iraq, too.

    The United States wants to punish Iran economically using sanctions so it abandons its nuclear program. But the United States has created economic opportunities for Iran in Iraq, and that could help undermine the sanctions.

    Iraq has a long 900 mile border with Iran, and many Iraqi border guards are either corrupt or are sympathetic to Iran. That’s proven every day by the illegal drugs smuggled across the Iran-Iraq border, according to the International Narcotics Control Board, the independent monitoring body associated with the United Nations. If drugs can go across, so can materials banned under the sanctions. 

    America’s efforts to strangle Iran with sanctions could end up being undermined by the very nation the United States went to such great efforts to create. 
     
    Iraq is not an Iranian pawn. It is an independent and patriotic country. And some day, due to all its oil, it may be a very rich country, as well. The United States, despite the huge cost of this war can and probably will make money here eventually. Still, history may not be kind to this project. 

    Iraq has become a Shiite-led state that feels a certain affinity to Iran, its giant Shiite neighbor. It is hard to imagine any of this was part of the plan when President Bush gave Saddam Hussein 48 hours to leave on that cold night in Baghdad.
     
    Richard Engel, NBC News Chief Correspondent, has covered Iraq since the initial U.S. invasion in March 2003. He is the author of two books on Iraq: "A Fist in the Hornet's Nest" and "War Journal: My Five Years in Iraq."

    See more of his reporting on the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq on the Nightly News with Brian Williams Wednesday.

    Related link: Photo Blog: Iraqi voices: Patchwork electrical grid a symbol of country's disconnects

     

     

    863 comments

    Can't say I care. We're out of there, let them all kill each other.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: us, iraq, iran, sunni, shiite, featured, richard-engel
  • 12
    Dec
    2011
    11:59am, EST

    U.S. bases in Iraq becoming 'ghost towns'

     

    Across Iraq, U.S. troops are packing up everything and preparing to leave the country, leaving many bases surreally quiet. NBC's Richard Engel reports. 
     


    1 comment

    OK..so what happened to our national security ?. As we leave an area of combat and the death of our men and women of our military...The media continues to provide our adversaries with detailed information about our plans, military strength and locations. The media is putting our troops in harms way  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, u-s-troops, richard-engel
  • 7
    Dec
    2011
    2:09pm, EST

    US on Iraq security: 'We really don't know what's going to happen'

    "We really don't know what's going to happen" with security in Iraq after the U.S. forces leave, says Lt. Gen. Frank Helmick, Deputy Commanding General of U.S. Forces.

    By Courtney Kube, NBC News Pentagon producer

    WASHINGTON – "We really don't know what's going to happen" with security in Iraq after the U.S. forces leave, a senior U.S. military officer said from Baghdad Wednesday morning.


    When asked whether the Iraqi Security Forces can keep violence under control after American forces leave the country, Lt. Gen. Frank Helmick, Deputy Commanding General of U.S. Forces-Iraq, said Wednesday that the U.S. military just does not know.

    Mohammed Jalil / EPA

    Iraqi and U.S. officers talk during the handover ceremony of al-Asad Airbase in Anbar province, on Wednesday. The U.S. military handed over control of the al-Asad base which is the largest U.S. military Airbase near the Iraqi-Syrian border to the Iraqi government as part of its withdrawal from the country by the end of a year.

    "There is a question mark right now for external security," Helmick said during a teleconference from Iraq this morning, adding that the U.S. has "done all we can do," to prepare them for the continuing internal threat facing the country.

    Asked whether the U.S. military could be called to help secure the so-called International Zone -- which houses the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad -- Helmick said that Iraqi forces would continue to take on that mission.

    "We are going to have to rely on host nation forces," he said, adding that because of the current agreement with the Iraqis, "we have no option" to use U.S. military forces for that mission.

    After more than eight years of U.S. military briefings from Iraq this was the last teleconference briefing from Iraq to the Pentagon briefing room.

    Helmick served several tours in Iraq, beginning in 2003. When asked whether the war was worth it, he said that is a "personal question." But he added that "from where I sit, I have to say it was."

    U.S. troops in Iraq are scheduled to leave by the end of the year when a bilateral security pact expires, after more than eight years of war and occupation that included the overthrow of dictator Saddam Hussein.

    Joe Raedle / Getty Images

    A U.S. Army soldier from the 2-82 Field Artillery, 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, carries his gear after arriving in Kuwait from Camp Adder in Iraq on Wednesday at Camp Virginia, near Kuwait City, Kuwait.

    Some facts from the Pentagon on the U.S. drawdown of troops:

    - In 2007 the U.S. occupied 505 bases; today the U.S. occupies five bases.

    - Over the past 18 months, U.S. military drivers have clocked more than 16 million miles to carry people and equipment out of the country – that is 482 times around the earth.

    - The U.S. has fewer than 1,000 truckloads of equipment left to take out of the country.

    -  The U.S. currently has about 8,000 troops left in Iraq, and about 5,000 U.S. contractors. That is down from a high of approximately 300,000 uniformed U.S. military and U.S. contractors in that country in 2007.

    Read more content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Blagojevich sentenced to 14 years in prison
    • 'Silent coup' rumors swirl as Zardari leaves Pakistan
    • Sandusky rearrested in Pennsylvania
    • NBC: Downed drone spied on Iran nuke facilities
    • Activists ask: Undercover cop? Or one of us?
    • A consumer's tale of a credit report 'Catch 22'
    • Kids pay biggest price for world's gold craving

    60 comments

    I can tell you exactly what will happen. Iran will help Al Sadr take over Iraq. There you have it, in a nutshell.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, featured, us-withdrawal, courtney-kube
  • 9
    Sep
    2011
    4:47pm, EDT

    Iraqi: 'We are paying the price' for 9/11

    Iraqis reflect on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. "They used the events of Sept. 11 as an excuse to enter Iraq," says Lana Shaikhly, a law student in Baghdad.

    As the U.S. marks the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Iraqis reflect on what the attacks meant for them.

    "This incident was the end of peace in the Middle East. Not only in Iraq, war started and all of our lives have been changed," said Lana Shaikhly, a 21-year-old law student in Baghdad.

    "They used the events of Sept. 11 as an excuse to enter Iraq. It's one of the reasons."


    For Haydar Al-Rubaie, a shopkeepr in Baghdad, Iraq really got the brunt of the attacks. "The attacks hurt innocent people and at the end of the day, we are paying the price for it. We were not guilty of the attacks, but we are paying the price for it."

    Click on the video above to hear more Iraqi voices on the attacks of 9/11.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, 9-11, sept-11-attacks
  • 25
    Aug
    2011
    4:29pm, EDT

    Will a post-Gadhafi Libya look like Iraq?

    Filippo Monteforte / AFP - Getty Images

    Libyan rebels seize boxes of ammunition hidden underground by Gadhafi's forces in the al-Maser forest in southern Tripoli on Thursday. Click on the photo to see a Libya slideshow.

    By Jim Maceda, NBC News Correspondent

    LONDON – Black smoke billowed from parts of the capital. The crack of gunfire echoed off buildings. Rag-tag gunmen manned checkpoints on dozens of street corners, covered in bullet-belts and brandishing RPG launchers. A massive statue symbolizing the dictator’s rule had fallen just two days before. Some were still kicking at his likeness and tearing up his posters.

    But many others were keen to withdraw funds from the bank, reopen their shops and put their lives back together. Some were giddy with revolution. Others feared the looting they’d witnessed and warned of worse to come. The people were awash in weapons. The dictator, meanwhile, had disappeared.

    This might sound like today’s Tripoli, but this was the scene in Baghdad as our NBC News convoy drove into the war-torn city on April 11, 2003.


    Bagdad? Tripoli?
    I find myself flashing constantly back to those heady days as I watch the amazing images of the collapse of the Gadhafi regime. It was a collapse which, as with Saddam Hussein’s, outpaced my own expectations. I’m clearly not alone. Here in London, many British papers have been replete with editorials by “experts” recalling early “post-Saddam” Iraq, and drawing comparisons – and mostly differences – with post-Gadhafi Libya. 

    Among them, former British Foreign Minister Malcolm Rifkind neatly laid out the biggest contrasts in an editorial in the Times of London.

    First and foremost, Rifkind pointed out that the Libyan people – unlike the Iraqis – fought for and won their freedom. Iraqis, he wrote, had their freedom handed to them. Secondly, Iraqis had to suffer “the humiliation” of a U.S. occupation for years; but there are no “foreign boots” on the ground in Libya, though a small contingent of U.N. peacekeepers may be welcomed to help police Tripoli. Thirdly, the “seeds of civil war” were already planted in Iraq, with deepening bad blood between the Shiite majority, who were suddenly handed power, and Saddam’s Sunnis, who had lost their traditional hold on it.

    These differences are real, and Libya is not Iraq for many other reasons. But the rebels, and the NATO coalition that helped them win, are clearly worried about the similarities, and about not repeating the mistakes made in the days and weeks after Saddam’s fall.

    Lots of promises
    The rebel leadership has promised to include all Libyans in the New Libya. It’s asked policemen to stay at their posts. It claims that Libya will generate enough income through its restored oil industry to pay for its own nation building. And it promises a new constitution, a national referendum, and both free and fair parliamentary and presidential elections.

    Encouraging? Of course; but let’s take a step back again in time.

    The security vacuum left in Baghdad was filled by over-armed, disoriented U.S. soldiers, who did little more than watch, agog, as anything with value was looted.

    Who will fill a similar security vacuum in Tripoli if those Libyan police are too afraid of pro-Gadhafi snipers – or rockets – to actually police the streets? It would seem that unless Gadhafi and his sons are captured or killed, a pro-regime insurgency may well take root quickly. They could do as much damage in Tripoli as the black-clad Fedayeen Saddam, a paramilitary group loyal to the former Ba’athist government of Saddam Hussein, did in and around Baghdad.

    In addition, the rebel leadership says it will move “trained” security forces from Benghazi, in the East, to Tripoli, in the West, to avoid perhaps the biggest mistake made in Iraq, and keep the remains of the regime’s armed forces together. But how would that work, given the historic tension and animosity between the Eastern and Western Libyan tribes?

    In Libya, tribal loyalty rules supreme. It can be just as strong – and deadly – as sectarian ties in Iraq. In 1969, Gadhafi overthrew the Eastern tribal King Idris. For more than 40 years, Gadhafi survived by isolating, impoverishing, and sometimes crushing those tribes, near Benghazi. Now, seething with rage and greed, those same tribes want their due. Meanwhile, Western tribes, even those who side with the rebels, want anything but.

    It may be as dangerous for a Benghazi policeman or soldier to work the streets of Tripoli as it would have been for a Sunni cop to survive in Sadr City. And if Libyan security forces can’t manage to unite, who then would fill the vacuum? U.N. peacekeepers? The African Union? Or, more likely, French, British and U.S. “special advisors” and troops?

    Remember the Bush administration’s vision for post-Saddam Iraq back in 2003? That, after the Iraqi people rose up as one and Saddam Hussein fell, the nation’s rebuilding would be financed by oil money?

    What happened? Instead, insurgents sabotaged pipelines, assassinated engineers and managers, and suppressed Iraq’s oil industry for years. That same scenario could play out in Libya if today’s flimsy rebel coalition disintegrates into fighting between Libyan tribes, or between secular Libyans and Islamists.

    Thursday’s “London Times” summed up the worry, saying, “complacency would be foolish. Looting, revenge attacks against Gadhafi loyalists or internecine fighting could all make life rocky as any new regime seeks to gain a foothold in the country.” 

    Seen this movie before
    What is promised for Libya looks like a familiar movie.

    Iraq, like Libya, tried to move from decades of dictatorship to democracy almost overnight. It wrote a new constitution, held nation-wide elections – but that didn’t prevent an insurgency from killing thousands of U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians; it didn’t stop Sunni-Shiite bloodshed; nor did it prevent the rise of al-Qaida in Mesopotamia, one of the terrorist group’s most brutal affiliates.

    Rifkind, the former British Foreign Minister, said that “there is no evidence that [Libya’s Islamists] have any significant following.” But that was also the case in Iraq in 2003. Islamist radicals emerged there from the chaos and power vacuum left behind.

    It’s too early to say if Libya can avoid either, and not repeat history.

    Jim Maceda is an NBC News correspondent based in London, who has covered both Libya and Iraq.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, libya, featured, tripoli, jim-maceda
  • 18
    Aug
    2011
    5:47pm, EDT

    Year after 'end' of Iraq combat, peril on the ground for Americans

    Maya Alleruzzo / AP

    U.S. Army Pfc. David Hedge from Bealeton, Va., front, and fellow soldiers from 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment are bathed in rotor wash moments after arriving by Blackhawk helicopter for an operation to disrupt weapons smuggling in Istaqlal, north of Baghdad, Iraq, on Aug. 8.

    By Courtney Kube, NBC News producer

    BAGHDAD, IRAQ – One year ago today, the last of the "combat troops" drove out of in Iraq and into Kuwait, marking the symbolic end of more than seven years of U.S. combat in Iraq.

    Less than two weeks later, President Barack Obama sat in the Oval Office and declared that, "The American combat mission in Iraq has ended." But has it?


     

    June was the deadliest month for U.S. troops in Iraq since 2008. Fifteen U.S. service members died there that month.

    A U.S. military spokesperson in Iraq said that there are an average of 14 attacks per day across the country, targeting Iraqi civilians, Iraqi military and police, and U.S. troops.

    That's down from upward of 200 attacks per day back in 2007 during the height of combat operations there, but the spokesperson conceded that the number is still too high.

    "It’s a lot of attacks," Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Buchanan said during a meeting with Pentagon reporters this week, adding that the numbers of attacks and casualties "are not satisfactory."

    For some Americans, the war isn't over

    Buchanan said that while al-Qaida in Iraq still has as many as 1,000 fighters operating there, the group is "a shadow of what it use to be." It "doesn’t represent the existential threat to the state" that it once did, and its finances are "seriously degraded," he said.

    So who is behind the attacks in Iraq now?

    Most can be linked to a Shiite extremist group called the Promised Day Brigades. The group, which boasts several thousand fighters, is the successor of the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army, which disbanded several years ago.

    Buchanan also warned of a significant increase in support for the insurgents from Iran and particularly from a special Iranian military unit called the Quds Force in recent weeks. The U.S. military recently displayed new, more lethal rockets that it said had been manufactured in Iran and then used to attack American troops.

    The militants also still show a surprising ability to regenerate their leadership, Buchanan said. In the northern city of Mosul, the insurgent leadership has already been taken out five times this year, but each time a new leader has emerged quickly, often within a matter of days.

    "It’s going to take a long time" to defeat these groups, Buchanan warned.

    Just as violence has persisted in Iraq, U.S. military operations have continued there, as well. Although the Iraqi military is supposed to have the lead in security operations throughout the country, Buchanan revealed two unilateral airstrikes that U.S. forces conducted this summer.

    U.S. Apache helicopters fired on several insurgents who were spotted firing rocket-propelled grenades at a U.S. base near the Basra airport in southern Iraq, he said. There was no Iraqi military involvement in the Apache strike.

    In another incident in June, U.S. forces spotted several insurgents planting a roadside bomb to target an approaching U.S. convoy. U.S. helicopters fired on the men, preventing the convoy from striking the bomb. There was no Iraqi military involved in this incident, either.

    The continued danger to U.S. military men and women deployed in Iraq was brought home to an NBC News team at the beginning of this month. Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, cameraman Jim Long and I were at Victory Base in Baghdad when insurgents began launching rockets at the complex. As the sirens blared and an announcer warned of "Incoming!" an enlisted soldier ran by and said, "Here we go again." He later explained that the enemy has been "peppering" Victory with rockets lately and showed off several places where shrapnel had pocked blast walls and shattered windows.

    During his first visit to Baghdad as secretary of defense in July, Leon Panetta gave an exclusive interview to Miklaszewski, telling him that the U.S. will not sit idly by as troops are attacked. "We’re continuing to see attacks," Panetta said, adding that, "we have a responsibility to defend our soldiers, and that’s exactly what I’m going to do."

    New Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says the U.S. is "within reach" of defeating al-Qaida. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski, who is traveling with Panetta, reports.

    What does the future hold for the U.S. in Iraq?

    On Aug. 2, the Iraqi government announced it wanted to begin negotiating for a continuing U.S. presence in Iraq beyond the current Dec. 31 deadline to have all U.S. troops out of the country.  U.S. defense officials believe that the U.S. presence after the end of this year will be primarily for training and partnering with the Iraqi security forces.

    But, more than two weeks after the Iraqi announcement, there is still no formal request from the Iraqi government for U.S. troops to stay.

    Buchanan characterized the talks as still very preliminary, saying that they have not "progressed to a point I would call negotiations." He also warned that the longer the U.S. goes without a specific request for troops to stay, "we lose some options."

    One thing has not changed much since the mission changed from Operation Iraqi Freedom to Operation New Dawn last year – the number of U.S. troops on the ground in Iraq.

    This time last year, the U.S. had about 50,000 troops in Iraq. Today, there are still roughly 46,000 serving there. Buchanan admitted that will have to change in the very near future – though how many troops may stay on for the next phase remains a mystery.

    Maya Alleruzzo / AP

    U.S. Army Pvt. 1st Class David Hedge from Bealeton, Va., center, and fellow soldiers during an operation to disrupt weapons smuggling in Istaqlal, north of Baghdad, Iraq.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, mideast, jim-miklaszewski, courtney-kube
  • 15
    Aug
    2011
    6:33pm, EDT

    New evidence links Iran to terror group

    By Courtney Kube
          NBC News producer  

    U.S. officials tell NBC News that there is new evidence that Iran may be supplying goods to the terror group that U.S. intelligence officials consider to be the most dangerous threat to the United States -- al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

    Over the weekend, the Indian Navy intercepted a ship -- the MV Nafis-I -- off the coast of Mumbai. Indian sailors found several weapons (including a few AK-47s and a pistol), but mostly just food and supplies on board. The ship had a crew of several Yemeni nationals, along with at least one Somali, and several others from other nearby African countries.

    A U.S. official says that the ship left Iran several days ago and that U.S. assets tracked the ship as a "vessel of interest" for a few days and then provided information to the Indian Navy so they could intercept it.

    U.S. intelligence officials say that the ship was headed to Yemen and they believe it was bringing the goods to AQAP.

    "We were cognizant of this vessel and what it was intending to do," one U.S. official said, adding that, "we go on our best intelligence."  The official explained that if a ship is transporting goods to supply a terror network, then the vessel is in violation of the U.N. Security Council resolution and is subject to boarding.

    The official acknowledged that there were not many weapons on the ship when it was boarded, but also pointed out that it is common for crews to throw weapons overboard when a military vessel approaches.

    A senior defense official said that if Iran is aiding AQAP, that would be "highly unusual," but added that there is clear evidence that Iran has supported other branches of al-Qaida in the recent past, including al-Qaida in Iraq.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, yemen, iran, terror, al-qaida
  • 18
    Jan
    2011
    4:37pm, EST

    Stoic Iraqis carry on despite violence

    By Ghazi Balkiz, NBC News Producer
     
    Another attack in Iraq, another deranged suicide bomber takes out dozens of would be policemen.

    The suicide bomber on Tuesday killed at least 52 and wounded many others among a crowd of police recruits looking for work in Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit. 
     
    The message from the insurgents to the Iraqi people and government was clear: “We are still here. We are still strong. We can reach you when we want; not even your police force can protect you.”
     
    Recruitment centers are very easy targets in Iraq. They are usually buildings surrounded by blast walls and sand bags, but the recruits who are lining up to go inside are not protected, making them sitting ducks.
     
    I just came back from Iraq last Friday. On the ride back home from the airport in London, the taxi driver asked me, “Is it still dangerous there? Is the war still going? Is it safe now?”
     
    I told him Iraq has been at war for a very long time. There was the Iraq-Iran war in the ‘80s, then there was the first Gulf War and then there was the invasion in 2003 and the mayhem that followed it.
     
    Safety in Iraq is a relative term. A few years ago there was war on the streets of almost every major city in Iraq; there were car bombs, suicide bombers, improvised explosive devices, kidnappings, executions, sectarian violence and death squads.
     
    Now the level of violence has dropped significantly, but it has not disappeared.

    People still get killed, suicide bombers still blow themselves up and IEDs still explode.
     
    Last week when I was sitting in the NBC News bureau in Baghdad, a blast killed some people just a few miles from our office. Some of our Iraqi employees looked at each other, shrugged, and carried on with whatever they were doing.
     
    They have gotten used to it. Some of my Iraqi friends say if a few car bombs go off every month, the situation is OK; they figure at least it’s better than what it was a few years ago.
     
    I told the taxi driver that I am not a social behavior analyst, but I think that people adapt to the circumstances that surround them.

    The terror of the past nine years and the violence has numbed many Iraqis, but at the same time, their human nature has helped them carry on with their lives.

    2 comments

    They lined up to get guns, so they are not peaceful bystanders, but rather they are combatants.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, tikrit, ghazi-balkiz
  • 31
    Aug
    2010
    4:14pm, EDT

    Q&A with NBC Chief Foreign Correspondent Richard Engel

    Now that the U.S. has officially ended its combat mission in Iraq, what's next for the war-torn nation? Read a Q&A with NBC's Richard Engel, who has reported from the Middle East since the war began.

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    5 comments

    The people who have allowed themselves to be dominated for 30 to 40 years should expect only one thing to free them - armed insurrection. Dictators do not want to be average citizens again. To try it slowly brings most mass killings.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, middle-east, us-troops, richard-engel
  • 19
    Aug
    2010
    2:12pm, EDT

    Combat troops on Iraq pullout: 'I'm going home'

    By Charlene Gubash, NBC News Producer

    CAMP VIRGINIA, KUWAIT – Headlights pierced the pitch black horizon as the first members of the 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team convoy rolled over the empty flat desert of Iraq into the safety of Kuwait.

    Onlookers, military personnel and a few NBC journalists, shared a sense of watching history unfold as the first convoy of the last combat brigade left Iraq on Tuesday, the start of a two-day process to get all of the units over the border and into Kuwait. But the ceremony to greet the incoming soldiers was touchingly simple.

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    Brig. Gen. Nick Tooliados and his aide stood at attention to salute each passing tank commander and shout a few words of praise. “Good job guys, way to go!” A soldier yelled “Hooah!” in affirmation.

    The helmeted tank commanders perched above each massive, heavily armored and armed eight-wheeled vehicle turned and saluted back. A few raised their hands in a victory sign, one high-fived his gunner and smiled.

    In a single burst of jubilance, one soldier shouted out the back of his Stryker vehicle, “We won, we're going home! We won! Its over! America, we brought democracy to Iraq!”

    ‘It’s just a relief’
    Further down the otherwise empty road, each driver pulled off the road and easily maneuvered their Strykers into rows. Hatches opened and as soldiers emerged, they stretched and slipped out of their now unneeded flak jackets and helmets.

    Then they immediately began what they called “tearing down,” the long process of disarming, stripping down and cleaning their vehicles to prepare them for shipment, a process that would last for days. NBC News delayed this report because of a military embargo until the final unit of the massive convoy crossed the border in the wee hours Thursday.

    In temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit and after a two-day drive from Baghdad, they began unscrewing heavy machine gun barrels, emptying containers of ammunition by hand and cleaning out candy wrappers and empty cans and bottles from their vehicles. But they didn’t complain. They were relieved to be out of harm’s way.

    Staff Sgt. Heon Hong, who hails from Guam, spent three tours in Iraq. For the last 12 months, he trained Iraqi security forces. “Oh it feels good, I’m glad I’m here. I’m glad were done with Iraq. Hopefully I never come back to Iraq.”

    “It’s just a relief you know,” said Pfc. Timothy Berrena, originally from Connecticut. “[After] 12 months of straight being in that vehicle – realizing that this may be the last time I wear that kit in the wild is a nice feeling.”

    Staff Sgt. Steven Bearor, of Merrimac, Conn., like so many others, thought only of home. Asked what was the best part of coming to Kuwait, he said, “One, you know no one else is going to get hurt, and two, I am going home.”

    Some reflected on the small blessings they once took for granted. Pvt. Troy Danahy of Hampton, N.H. , explained what he’d missed during his tour. “Just America in general. I just miss grass, simple, little things, winter, snow and all that.”

    Sgt. Keith Chase said he has a new-found appreciation for the safety of American roads. “Just knowing that there’s people not out there trying to hurt my comrades and myself. Knowing that we can drive on safe routes is a big plus, and I won't ever take that for granted again because I know there’s bad guys out there that really want to do us harm.”

    Confident they left Iraq in good hands
    Most of the soldiers expressed pride in a job well done. Chase’s company cleared Baghdad’s streets of explosives and led the way out of Iraq for the convoy to Kuwait. “My company and my platoon, we did route clearance in and around Baghdad for the last year and we cleared a lot of kilometers up there over the past year.”

    Pvt. Nicholas Kelly served with Chase and expressed relief at being done. “Amazing. We finally made it out, we made it back. We’re good. Happy to be here. Happy to go home. We got our mission done successfully and it was good to go.”

    Bearor, who helped train Iraqi security forces, felt they had left Iraq’s security in good hands. “We did a damn good job. They [the Iraqi security] are ready to go. I have … faith and confidence they will be able to pull off the job.”

    Ready for next job
    No complaints were heard as soldiers continued the business of breaking down the tank-like vehicles in which they spent so much time over the past year.

    They saw each mundane task as bringing them one step closer to home. But almost everybody we spoke with had already re-enlisted or was planning to re-enlist.

    As a result of his service, Pfc. Joshua Abblar, who is originally from the Philippines, became a U.S. citizen during a Fourth of July ceremony presided over by Vice President Joe Biden in Baghdad. He was proud of his work and almost wistful about leaving.

    “Our job was to provide security to Iraqi people, go on patrols and make sure nothing was happening. Also clearing roads of IED explosives and supporting the new government that’s forming now,” said Abblar.

    This was his first deployment, but he was ready for more. “I just started my job, it’s my first year and I loved every second of it… I feel kind of sad because we got a bond between the people in Iraq.”

    7 comments

    when was the last time america celebrated troops coming home WWII since then they almost have to sneak back in the country I am a vietnam vet and I sure don't remember welcome home parades The troops sure did a better job than the clowns who put them in that mess in Iraq. Well done troops.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, kuwait, featured, charlene-gubash, combat-troops-pullout
  • 18
    Aug
    2010
    7:02pm, EDT

    As combat troops leave, Iraq's future still uncertain

    By Jack Jacobs, NBC News military analyst

    NEW YORK – It has been a complicated logistical enterprise, but the president’s goal of reducing the American presence in Iraq seems to be proceeding more or less according to his campaign promise.

    But anyone who thinks that there will be no U.S. forces in Iraq is mistaken – we will continue to suffer casualties and spend money while the fractious politicians in Baghdad try to get a grip on their fragile democracy.

    Sadly, the odds of long-term success are long.

    Combat troops say 'So long'
    We are withdrawing combat troops, but we will leave behind a substantial support base of Americans to help the wobbly Iraqis: technical experts, logistical support, engineers, air power, administrative people and a host of other assistance that the Iraqis desperately need. Some will be located in Iraq, and some will be based in nations bordering Iraq, but they will remain in the region for a long time to come.

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    U.S. troops will help provide local security, but the American combat role will be formally terminated. The thousands of soldiers, Marines and airmen left behind will serve as advisers, formed into mobile teams to train Iraqi military and police units. As we discovered in Vietnam and a number of other places, advisory work is slow, labor-intensive and frustrating.

    Advisers have no authority over the Iraqis and must battle disinterest, ethnic tension, illiteracy, ineptitude, fear and corruption, all formidable opponents. Terrorists, separatists and the disaffected will have to be found and eliminated or converted, but in the meantime there will be violence. And strategic regional threats, Iran chief among them, will complicate Iraqi military recovery. Getting the Iraqis into fighting trim will be neither quick nor easy.

    Lights need to come on
    Not all of Iraq’s problems are security troubles. A good example of the many other things that need to be fixed is the electrical power grid. It does work, but only occasionally and not in a predictable way. Even if residents can become inured to an intermittent and insufficient supply of electricity – commerce can’t.

    A viable commercial sector is a principal element of stability, and economic activity will not grow until we help the Iraqis generate adequate, reliable electricity. In a country that has consumed billions of dollars in American aid, this important task is not supposed to be difficult to accomplish.

    Whatever else one can say about President Barack Obama's decisions on national security – and there is plenty to criticize – one can’t accuse Obama of failing to keep his word on Iraq.

    Then an Illinois state senator, Obama voted against the invasion, and he has been consistent in saying that it was a waste of resources and distracted us from the objective of eliminating the Taliban in Afghanistan.

    But Obama also has announced that, beginning in less than a year, he will order a withdrawal of combat troops from Afghanistan as well.

    Presumably, he intends to fight the Taliban from a distance with remotely piloted aircraft and with the occasional special operation. Although these instruments are cost effective, they are not decisive in an asymmetrical conflict, and so his pledge to defeat the Taliban, which requires more time and troops, is a hollow one.

    Different challenges, same goal
    In most respects, Iraq and Afghanistan are as different as can be. Iraq was a centrally governed political entity for a long time; Afghanistan is a loose collection of tribes. Iraq has a history of successful agriculture and industry since ancient times; Afghanistan is mostly desolate and is among the poorest countries on earth.

    But Obama's strategic objective in Iraq is startlingly similar to that in Afghanistan: establish and support a stable democracy that can defend itself against its enemies. However, like in Afghanistan, it is not clear that there is much to support in Iraq just yet.

    There is a continuous, paralyzing and often violent argument among Iraqis about parliamentary representation, about the method of voting, about the distribution of resources, about almost everything – basic concepts on which citizens must concur if the political machinery is to operate at all. Debate is healthy, but paralysis is not, particularly in a nation that is at risk without strong leadership from Baghdad.

    Everything we are doing in Iraq, and everything we continue to sacrifice, is for the purpose of giving the Iraqis safety, stability and prosperity.

    We deposed a dictator and put in his place a system designed to deliver political power to those who did not have it before, but in the process we are leaving the Iraqis without the leadership it needs to survive.

    In the wake of our departure, Baghdad's weakness is liable to encourage the rise of another despot, demonstrating something we learned during our own revolution but have evidently forgotten: installing democracy takes time and patience, two valuable resources in short supply.

    Jack Jacobs is a Medal of Honor recipient for heroic actions during the Vietnam War.

    14 comments

    Col. Jacobs is the absolute real deal. An extraordinary warrior who speaks clearly and thoughtfully. "The man with outer courage dares to die; the man with inner courage dares to live" -- Lao Tze. Col. Jacobs is both.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, withdrawal, combat-troops, jack-jacobs
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • egypt,
  • china,
  • afghanistan,
  • libya,
  • pakistan,
  • world-news,
  • israel,
  • hosni-mubarak,
  • japan,
  • tsunami,
  • richard-engel,
  • ian-williams,
  • middle-east,
  • japan-earthquake,
  • 2010,
  • adrienne-mong,
  • ed-flanagan,
  • jim-maceda,
  • bo-gu,
  • charlene-gubash,
  • mubarak,
  • world-cup,
  • protests,
  • after-the-wave,
  • cairo,
  • miranda-leitsinger,
  • north-korea,
  • iran,
  • gadhafi,
  • thailand,
  • germany,
  • russia,
  • london,
  • u-s,
  • italy,
  • claudio-lavanga,
  • palestinians,
  • paul-goldman,
  • ayman-mohyeldin,
  • somalia,
  • britain,
  • syria,
  • andy-eckardt,
  • obama
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

World Blog

NBC News World Blog provides a dynamic look at world events and trends – both big and small – from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries – from text to video – explore the latest news events and how they are shaping our world. Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog!

Follow us

Archives

  • 2012
    • May (4)
    • April (28)
    • March (40)
    • February (33)
    • January (44)
  • 2011
    • December (41)
    • November (51)
    • October (37)
    • September (39)
    • August (46)
    • July (35)
    • June (33)
    • May (31)
    • April (16)
    • March (46)
    • February (159)
    • January (42)
  • 2010
    • December (16)
    • November (20)
    • October (19)
    • September (23)
    • August (33)
    • July (28)
    • June (36)
    • May (26)
    • April (37)
    • March (30)
    • February (44)
    • January (29)
  • 2009
    • December (21)
    • November (19)
    • October (24)
    • September (23)
    • August (15)
    • July (27)
    • June (32)
    • May (24)
    • April (30)
    • March (24)
    • February (26)
    • January (35)
  • 2008
    • December (25)
    • November (31)
    • October (27)
    • September (17)
    • August (22)
    • July (21)
    • June (29)
    • May (30)
    • April (27)
    • March (26)
    • February (27)
    • January (28)
  • 2007
    • December (18)
    • November (28)
    • October (25)
    • September (32)
    • August (32)
    • July (25)
    • June (32)
    • May (24)
    • April (21)
    • March (29)
    • February (21)
    • January (28)

Most Commented

  • In debt or jobless, many Italians choose suicide (206)
  • City divided by disgraced Communist leader's legacy (7)

Other blogs

  • Daily Nightly
  • The Maddow Blog
  • The Last Word
  • Hardblogger
  • First Read
  • Field Notes
  • Inside Dateline
  • Behind the Wall
  • The Ed Show
  • Morning Joe
  • Daily Rundown

msnbc.com top stories

3147,10
© 2012 msnbc.com
  • World news on msnbc.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Terms & Conditions
  • MSN Privacy
  • Legal
  • Advertise
Advertise | AdChoices