ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Resource-hungry China heads to Afghanistan

Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:01 PM
Filed Under:

LOGAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan – Early on a recent morning we were driving to a shoot when an astonishing sight loomed up ahead of us. NBC News cameraman Steve O’Neill exclaimed, "It’s the Great Wall of China!"

The "wall" snaking before us, easily several miles long, was made of Hesco sandbags and circled a camp for Chinese workers. Though not permitted to enter the site, we could see rows and rows of neat white buildings with blue trim; the temporary structures looked exactly like the migrant workers’ housing at construction sites all across China.

Size apart, it was all somewhat unremarkable, except for the fact that we were in eastern Afghanistan.

Image: Hesco sandbags surrounding the Chinese workers camp
Adrienne Mong / NBC News
"It's the Great Wall of China," said NBC cameraman Steve O'Neill when we saw the Hesco sandbags surrounding the Chinese workers camp at the Aynak copper mine in Afghanistan.

The Chinese workers – several hundred technicians – are part of a multibillion-dollar Chinese investment in Afghanistan’s largest-ever infrastructure project, the Aynak copper mine.

Discovered in 1974 but virtually dormant since the start of the Soviet War in 1979, the Aynak mine is believed to contain the world’s second-largest untapped copper deposits and could propel Afghanistan into the ranks of the world’s top 15 copper producers. 

After wooing Afghan officials from as early as 2001, a Chinese mainland joint venture finally won the rights in 2007 to develop the site over 30 years. So far, it has sunk more than $4 billion into the project. 

The joint venture – between majority partner China Metallurgical Group Corp. and Jiangxi Copper Corp. – expects production to begin by the end of 2011 with an initial annual output of 180,000 tons of copper that will eventually grow to 320,000 tons. China will have rights to half that output, which it needs to fuel its own massive economic growth.

But the mine is just outside Kabul, in Logar Province, where there has been heightened insurgent activity. Some 1,500 Afghan police are stationed on site with a new police barracks in the works. And although they say they are not attached to the project, the U.S. Army’s 10th Mountain Division occasionally sends units to patrol the area. China – of course, not being a member of NATO – has no troops on the ground in Afghanistan. 

It’s this set-up that’s feeding a percolating debate about China’s role in Afghanistan. 

Adrienne Mong/NBC News
The dormitories housing Chinese workers at the Aynak Copper Mine came from China.

America fights, China profits? 
In making the case for converging U.S. and Chinese interests in Afghanistan, Robert Kaplan wrote last week in a New York Times opinion piece that, "The problem is that while America is sacrificing its blood and treasure, the Chinese will reap the benefits. The whole direction of America’s military and diplomatic effort is toward an exit strategy, whereas the Chinese hope to stay and profit."

In the op-ed, titled "Beijing’s Afghan Gamble," Kaplan also noted, "China will find a way to benefit no matter what the United States does in Afghanistan. But it probably benefits more if we stay and add troops to the fight." 

No doubt the discussion will boil over after James Yeager, an American geologist, and former congressman Don Ritter, who has an advanced degree in metallurgical engineering and studied in Moscow, hold a press briefing in Washington on Thursday.  The event is provocatively titled, "Report on the Aynak Copper Tender in Afghanistan: How China Won and the West Lost." 

Ritter, now president of the Afghan-American Chamber of Commerce, called the Aynak bidding process flawed and colored by the fact the Bush administration "didn’t have the capacity or the competency to understand the importance of [Aynak]." Speaking from his home in the Washington area, he said: "We’re giving tens of billions of dollars in assistance to Afghanistan, and we’re getting no credit."

Ritter said the report to be presented Thursday was not done under the Chamber’s auspices. 

NBC News asked the U.S. Embassy in Kabul for comment, but the mission was unable to provide anyone for us to interview in time for this article.  

Ritter says the bottom line is: "We need a policy on developing mines and minerals and oil and gas in Afghanistan. Otherwise, it will be dominated by Chinese, who are wired to the Iranians through their oil investments, and the Pakistanis, because of the China-India competition."

It all sounds like some postmodernist version of the Great Game, with the players this time being the U.S., China and India instead of Britain, Russia and France. 

But an Afghan businessman who runs a construction outfit subcontracting with the joint venture, MCC-JCL Aynak Minerals Co. (also known as MCC), sees the situation differently.

Adrienne Mong/ NBC News
The Aynak Copper Mine in Logar Province, Afghanistan.

‘Poverty is the problem’ 
"This project will benefit Afghanistan and bring jobs," said Nurzaman Stanikzai, a 44-year-old native of Logar Province.  His company has been helping build some of the roads at the copper mine as well as the dormitories for Chinese workers. "The American troops should start projects like this copper mine."

In addition to setting up the copper production infrastructure, which includes a smelter, power generation station, coal mine and groundwater system, the Chinese joint venture is also building roads, Afghanistan’s first national railway,  new homes for villagers who will be resettled from the immediate area of the mine, hospitals and schools.

Government officials expect the copper mine to earn hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and royalties as well as provide jobs – direct and indirect – for nearly 40,000 people.

And in contrast to many Chinese investments on the African continent, where Chinese labor is typically brought in, most of the jobs from the Aynak copper mine project are designed to go to the Afghan people.

Under the contract terms, initially some of the workers, including the mine technicians, will be Chinese, but over time training will be provided to the Afghan workers so they can take over more skilled jobs.

"The instability in our country today is due to joblessness. Poverty is the problem," said Stanikzai as he warmed to his theme one afternoon in the spartan comfort of his home in central Kabul. "President Obama should not make a decision to send more troops to Afghanistan. If the U.S. wants to help, it needs to provide more jobs or invite foreign investment into our country."

The trick, of course, is how to court foreign investors while the country is still in the midst of a war.

‘They benefit … but we do, too’
When we visited the Aynak copper mine to shoot a story about landmine detection, everywhere we looked security was at the forefront.

We drove through two checkpoints just to get onto the main road leading to the copper mine.  Afghan police manned tents on nearby hills. A green chain-link fence provided the outer limit to the site. And of course there were those huge Hesco sandbags that ring the police camp and the Chinese workers camp.

It turns out those buildings did come from China. Stanikzai imported most of the equipment and materials for constructing the dorms. "This was at the request of the MCC," he said, adding that he would have preferred to contract everything locally because it would have cost less.

But this was Stanikzai’s only hint of criticism of Chinese management. Otherwise, he admires China for coming into Afghanistan and rejects charges that it’s merely satisfying its voracious appetite for natural resources by exploiting Aynak.

 "The Chinese are not doing this illegally," he said. "They have a contract with the Afghan government. They benefit, of course, but we do, too. We don’t have the skills or the companies or the expertise to develop a project like this."

Two of China’s bigger telecom equipment manufacturers, Huawei and ZTE, have helped develop cell phone technologies and Internet expansion equipment in Kabul and several other Afghan provinces. In previous years, the Chinese have also been involved in the Parwan irrigation project and rebuilding public hospitals in Kabul and Kandahar. 

China is certainly well-positioned to help develop Afghanistan’s infrastructure. In addition to having the experience developing their own vast country, the Chinese have also aggressively pursued opportunities across the African continent, from oil production in Angola and the Sudan, to copper mining in Zambia, forestry in Mozambique, and building roads and railways in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Security risks
While the Chinese may be benefiting from projects such as Aynak, they also face grave risks. Eleven Chinese construction workers were killed in their sleep by insurgents in Kunduz in 2004. At the time it was the deadliest attack of foreigners in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban in 2001. The workers were building a road from the Tajik border to Kabul. 

"Where Chinese companies seem to be building public infrastructure, they’re seen as proxies for the Afghan government so they are easy targets," said Ben Simpfendorfer, author of "Silk Road Economy: How a Rising Arab World is Turning Away from the West and Rediscovering China." As a result, "Chinese companies are consistently raising security issues," he said.

How they navigate unsafe waters is also still a work in progress. Though the Chinese are known for investing in troubled or violent countries, particularly in Africa, they are relatively new to Afghanistan.

"[The Chinese government] only wants to negotiate with governments," Simpfendorfer said.  "It doesn’t talk to opposition groups or civic groups, so until recently that was very difficult in a place like Afghanistan. That meant there is not a history of engagement there."

While Stanikzai admits insurgents may want to target Aynak, he thinks security does not pose as great a threat as some think. "If you don’t have the support of the local villagers and the local community, you can’t get security," he said. "But everyone supports this copper mine project."

Related Links:  
CFR.org: China's decade? Don't bet on it

Russia cuts gas deal with China
NYT: Biden no longer a lone voice on Afghanistan
Ben Simpendorfer's Silk Road Economy: "A New 'Great Game'"

 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This article just shows another reason why we are there. It is because of Afghanistan's rich and undeveloped minerals and its natural gas reserves. The U.S. government will never tell you why, but obviously China doesn't care. There is no terrorism its just a political and profitable game that is very tough to win.
We keep telling the public it is because the Taliban are bad they don't let people go to school blah blah blah. Sure we made it look like the Taliban were the worse government, but now we are inviting them into the Afghan government because now the U.S. realizes it can't win without doing so, and I don't think the Taliban will join unless the foreign forces set up a time frame to leave. POLITICS. No Afghan wants foreigners in their country, they just want to lead the simple life. We tell the world we will bring infrastructure and all this, but the locals don't really care for it, the real reason is for the future the West may have there, which probably won't happen.
It will be a relief for Uyghurs in the coming decade. Yes, china should migrate their overcrowded population to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia as well as China friendly Central Asian States, not just to Uyghur region. The more Chinese settles down in those countries, the less Chinese colonial pressure on Uyghurs...
By the way, those countries allied with China will reap the benefits of accepting "brilliant", "hard working" and "the perfectly ethical" Chinese immigrants. The Uyghurs should not be only the ones that taste Chinese' "generous help", we are fed up with it!. I support this move. Especially the Pakis and Russky should embrace their comrade brothers in Arm. I am sure they will live side by side forever!:)
Just another example of how the greatest capitalistic country in the world has a plan to control commodities and the USA falls farther behind.
The Chinese are great business people. Their one-man rule makes faster decision while our legislators are debating. It is unfortunate that American young men and women are dying in Afghanistan, spending billions, while the Chinese are lending their money to America, their Armed Forces strong and in reserve and their government continuously making business deals around the world to advance their economic interest. This picture doesn't look too good for us. I hope our leaders will be able to move faster.
I think it's complete BS that america is putting billions of dollars and thousands of soldiers into afghanistan and china gets these big contracts.  If the afghan government is going to do this I say pull out ALL american resources NOW
This may not be exactly what the U.S. envisioned but it will lead to a nation headed in the direction we would like to see and which we said we intended.
It amazes me how our country is condemmed by the international community.  We have spent billions of dollars "nation building", our troops are ambushed and yet, the Chinese come in, build a mine and are not attacked.  We send home caskets and they send home money.  I thought we were supposed to be the capitalists.                          
as far as our wonderful goverment Ron White said it best you cain't fix stupid!
Well you have it President Obama a reason not to send more troop's God is good somebody been knew about this and may have that long reach. Funny the more you thought now let Karzi protect them or let China protect them it seem ypu can go after Bin laden at your own pace but yet Vice President is a good leader and he deserves credit for not panicking also.Think the last admn did somethings in secret and greed goes a long way but I'm sorry this intel should have been reported no-wonder Cheney and daughter are so concerned about your moves.Some people say we never know who starts wars and if China is in Russia may be also.
Well you have it President Obama a reason not to send more troop's God is good somebody been knew about this and may have that long reach. Funny the more you thought now let Karzi protect them or let China protect them it seem ypu can go after Bin laden at your own pace but yet Vice President is a good leader and he deserves credit for not panicking also.Think the last admn did somethings in secret and greed goes a long way but I'm sorry this intel should have been reported no-wonder Cheney and daughter are so concerned about your moves.Some people say we never know who starts wars and if China is in Russia may be also.
If china is profiting off of our efforts, let them take over the effort to civilize the region. It is in thier best interest more than ours as they are located much closer.
Of course!  Instead of returning to our roots as a merchantile republic, we're playing the nation builder while the Red Chinese beat us at our own game.
Where is the glory for our dead soldiers in that?
I didn't read all of the story, but if the Chinese, and I am of asian descent, are profitting by being in Afghanistan, then they should be participating in the NATO coalition, and helping fight the Taliban and stabilize the country.  They should not be just benefiting from the business opportunity.  Are they going to go into IRAN next, and benefit from that situation?  I sincerely hope not.
very typical, we americans fight and die, while other countries critize us and benefit from our efforts.
The Bush administration couldn't figure out that rebuilding Afghanistan by developing what promises to be the world's second largest cooper deposit might just be the way to bring stability to Afghanistan and finally start to wean the country away from its current cash crop of opium poppies.  Now the Chinese are in the driver's seat on this project (they didn't get it until 2007, so its not like the U.S. didn't have a shot at it) and the U.S. military is providing defacto security.  Pathetic, but that's what the U.S. voters get for electing a moron.
I can't think of a better reason to get out of Afghanistan.  Why lose American lives to protect Chinese profits.  Afghanistan can't have it both ways.
It's sad that the Chinese are following more closely a model that the Founding Fathers promoted of free trade and no intangling alliances. They are all about business and the bottom line. If only the U.S. would stop trying to nation build and just do business without trying impose our values and form of government we might actually get somewhere.
Hey! it benefits Afghanistan (and yes, China too)...
isn't that the point?
Afghanistan needs industry/employment other than herion production. If one invests they should expect to profit. If the U S A feels its not getting enough 'bang for it's buck'(humor)....  lets LEAVE! Roy
Then tell China to do the fighting and pay for the war and bring our troops home. We need the money right here.
WE got it wrong again !!!!
We continue to spend good money after bad. The US needs to stop sending troops over to this regin, and control what we can and send in drone's to remove the Taliban. Then we need to place an American flag at mining area and let the Chinese pay us back the 50 billion that it cost us to defend this area, or it is now US property.
Get the US out and let's see if the Taliban force the Chinese hand.  Why are we spending billions of dollars soldiers lives protecting the mining interests of China.  I could give a r**s *ss about Afganastan.  
we need to leave immediately, pull out and let the afghans, run their own security and country. I'll bet the taliban can run out the current government and take over their countries resources. Better than poppy seed production. Quit providing foreign aid to all countries where our best intrests are not being served.

Let the Chinese choke on their ambitions to overtake the world.
We're doing the dirty work for the Chinese. (Just yesterday I read that the Chinese are # two on the billionaires list—nothing’s wrong with that.  After all, their economy is producing that and is supported by outside influences like Aynak.)  All what the US politicians are doing is blowing hot air for the sake of the Party. What is more important? The Party or the country. We want to have world supremacy with all of our technologies but the Chinese are looking.  They are not asleep.  They are building their armies, they are getting rich by the day, they will eventually top the US and we will be left wondering what the hell just happened? They will pull the rug from under our feet and we will wonder “What the hell just happened.”  Remember what happened to the Indians a few years ago? The Chinese pretended to give up parts of Kashmir and when the Indians went in, the massacred them.  Sure, something like this might not happen to the US –now or in the next few generations but with Earth’s resources are depleting, and the population rising and the Chinese moving into ‘cleared’ areas as the US are leaving them, maybe our future generations will speak not German, but Chinese.

It is insanity. We lose good, brave soldiers keeping the security of the Afghan villagers and, as a by product, the Chinese get that same protection for their profitable project. If we were to set up to extract natural resources there, would we be called plunderers and imperialists? It would probably taint our mission. The Chinese do not contribute one iota to the international forces present to protect their investment. Karzai is a corrupt politician, and he is turning over Afghani resources to countries that won't even put up a military stake for Afghanistan's future. Meanwhile the Afghan gov't doesn't even have a notion of what is democracy or the protection of individual rights -particularly women. Is this what we have our young men shed their blood over? To prop up this regime? Is it about killing Al Qeda? U.S. gov't estimates that there are less than 100 Al Qeda operatives in Afghanistan. Send more troops? Why not? Someone has to protect that Chinese copper mine and Karzai's bank account.
The US will let China develop the mine and then cause another war to take over the deposit!!!  Hey it's a win-win situation! Right?
I was totally unaware that Afghanistan had any resources, other than gravel, heroin, and doggedly persistent fighters. Perhaps the Chinese will prove themselves wise enough to successfully bring forth a  cooperative venture that brings some prosperity, stability, and a semblance of order to Afghanistan. Afghans desperately need an economy based on doing something useful, and the copper for the circuit boards for all the electronics we buy from China is going to get bought from somewhere, anyway. China has a load of money and a massive army, and if they are going to profit from Afghan resources, I don't see why we can't unload the responsibility and expense of keeping Afghans from killing each other over to the Chinese and extend them our cooperation and sincere best wishes as we make our orderly, overdue exit.    
Guess, this is how the US is paying back China for lending us money. We spend it on war in Afghan and the Chinese take it ($) out of Afghan.
Of course Afghanistan is full of natural resources, why do you think we're there, fighting for ? Are you waking up ??
There is always some underlying motive behind our country's foreign policy, and Americans pretend that we are just trying to improve the lives of others.  That's ridiculous, and Americans are the only ones keeping up the pretense.  You just turn this around and think what we Americans would be doing if some country came along and occupied us.  We, yes I mean you, would be called the insurgents.  You notice how the word insurgents came into favor during the Bush administration?  The definition before Bush was nationalists defending their country.  Now the definition is "enemy."  I vote to stay out of other countries' business and let them decide how to run elections, what religion to practice, and how to practice it. Maybe if we pulled out, America would be safer.  How about that for a exit strategy?
Lane M. San Diego, CA

Are you Crazy?
i dont wonder why the chinese want free labor in torned city. it would be a good investment but, it would take longer years to develop Afghanistan. but even so, this would be great significance in the foreigh relations of Afghanistan and China.
Currently, the US is in a budget cutting mode right across the nation--right? One of the first cut is schools. Now, how will we educate our kids, for future prosperities and to come up with solutions to problems--like this one?  Guess the great minds of the US politicians went to school when the budget was cut from education—too?
Don't be fooled, we(the U.S.) is a gun for hire. Don't think that our elitist citizens don't have any interest in these Chinese companies, the large corporations, banks and large gov't all have vested interest in each other.  For example, the 5 permanent members of the U.N.security council, U.S, Russia, England, France and of course China.  The bottom line is they all are in it for the greed, not the good!  We owe China lots of money, or if you like "favors", and this is a pay-off of sorts. You scratch my back while I kill for you!!!
This show how stupid we americans are, we spend money, getting killed and making more enemies. and Chines are making money and friends. why can't we learn a better way to solve our problems. Is going to war is the only way??
I feel ill just reading stories like this. Talk about injustice to our soldiers putting their lives on the line every moment while in that country and for what? So that countries like China can rape another piece of land, they cannot even take care of thier own country, destroyed their air, water & land, now they get to move into and destroy another..
They won't pull the troops out and bring them home, there's no jobs, think the unemployment rate is high now? We as a country have spun deeply out of control without a reliable navigator at the helm.
I am beginning to wonder whether the US involvement in any country is worth anything.  We constantly support unpopular and corrupt leaders as in Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan with our soldiers lives and our taxes while countries like China and Japan just go in and do business at tremendous profit without spending one dime or life.   Time to rethink our WWII approach to foreign policy.
We can't combine economic motives and military action. It is against the liberal creed to benefit economically as we are looked on as conquerers. We heard all about that in Iraq- it's all about the oil. Well it was never about the oil. And as far as gas in Afghanistan, we have 50 years worth of natural gas in the US that the Dems refuse to allow us to develop.
It just shows the Chinese can take advantage of us easily.
So the last attack on the chinese workers  was in 2001 ,that also they were tryinig to build road from northern afganistan to kabul , and taliban did not want it < remember Northern Alliance?  that was before the usa went in , this shows that China , Pakistan are hand in hand to keep USA busy with this stupid war, how come chinese not been attacked? because the Pakistanis tell the afgan taliban  not to attack them , In return the chines gives arms and money to Pakistan .
so we give money to Pakistan (15 Billion ) so far , and we give trade concesions to china. china is also trying to take US doller out and replace it with Euro . they are already in Africa and Russia and arab countried < iran. libya , the moment we stop giving money to egypt and all the other countries they will turn on us.  Guys we have to find alternate source for oil , and levy duties and ristrictions on china . and start our Indistries at home,
think long term !!! even Indians will pay for this
the US should just immediately pull all troops and support out of the country right away, and non stop.
let china deal with it.
plus we need to see how well they fight and their strategies and technology (that they stole)
we are chinese puppets ,Nixon designed them and clinton attached the strings.
i see a problem happening , china will dominate the world and they will be ruthless!!
This was a revelation of info I'd never heard before. It seems to me this is ultimately a good thing. We should be working with them and encouraging their involvement. I don't think we really want to see Chinese troops directly involved, but they should at least be contributing financially to security. When American companies have made big investments in this part of the world, the result usually ends up being a huge US taxpayer investment to protect their interests. The reason we're in Afghanistan is to protect our security interests, not to set up profit centers for American companies. Chinese investment means their long term involvement, not ours. Maybe that's a good thing.
This is just an example of the machine that China is, It does not care about the worlds issues or what is happening , it just wants to go in and make money.
They would deal with any government, corrupt or not with no concern for human rights abuses or political unrest, just so they can get what they want.It would not matter if we were there, They would pay the taliban,or Al Qiada,or anyone with disregard for what ever happens or what they are financing along as it does not disturb them.
LOL, those of you who are saying that we're fighting for China's profits are the same ones who would be blaming Haliburton if they were constructing a mine in Afghanistan.  The writers who are saying that any investment that provides decent jobs and an opportunity for local afghans are correct that those ventures will be protected by the local Chieftans.
As long as everyone gets a piece.  It's like that in many places though.
This is a good thing for Afghans, neo-merchantilism is a means to an end of poverty and living in the stone age. Why do you think developed nations are not constantly at war with each other?  We have mutual business interests, anyone who thinks the world runs on good will and good intentions(obama) clearly hasn't read enough books about world politics and economics. NO ONE IN THE WORLD IS ANYONES "REAL" FRIEND, people need to understand that we get along because we have mutual business interests to make our lives better and when we do that with each other we become "allies" or "friendly".  Only the ignorant point to their idealism about friends, world community, getting along, as a way to fix the world.  Americans need to start being real and realize how the world works. China and the US develope the country, we both take profits(thus protect our investment) afghans expand their economy, benifit as well and move out of poverty and it becomes a stable region.  THAT IS HOW IT WORKS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!
It is a shame that we became embroiled in a war in Iraq that destabalized the middle east rather than building, cultural, educational and economic ties with nations in the region.
Don't forget that all "MADE IN USA" are weapons!  What else can we do with weapons?
Nothing is surprising ?, China will always be hungry.
Populations are in billions,to get what they want, it doesnt matter if thousand dies.  America ,the savior
of the world, Beware.......on people
whose god is money ...........
I think most of you is right with your comments; however, President OBama needs to recalculate his decision to send more troops. Besides, is it really true that we are really fighting terrorists or is it just a show down to show and try our military might? We have been developping new ways of war games and new weapons, new uniforms and equipments. Mr. Obama should strictly be only about business and to establish American business in other countries; not to create government for foreigners, they can do that on their own. We really need to expend our business out there like back in the sixties. When we say no, we must mean it regardless what. Mr. Obama's ministerial cabinet need to reset their agenda and the republican party needs to get together with the President and leave the McCain era alone and move on for the econimical reestablishment of the country if they are really "Patriotic" as they said; not only for their personal gain but as well as the people of the United States. Like Mr. Obama did promised, " We really need a CHANGE" and that's what we, citizen of the US should work for; not for wars or supporters of wars. We don't need to go out there and kick butts, we have enough butts in this country to kick than  anywhere else. The chinese really show their intelligence over us while our young kids are dying for nothing. We really need to wake up and smell the coffe as we always say.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2098654

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.