ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Former Swat ruler: ‘revenge’ motivates Taliban

Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:46 PM
Filed Under:

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – Miangul Aurangzeb excused himself for being a little hard of hearing, and smiled wistfully.

"I’m happy I am not the ruler today," he said. "It was a no-win situation."

Aurangzeb, an affable octogenarian, is still affectionately known as the "Wali," or ruler, of Swat, even though it has been 40 years since his family was in power.

In 1969, when the Swat Valley was incorporated into Pakistan (more than 20 years after the partition of British India), Aurangzeb’s family kept their hereditary title and their homes – but lost their right to rule.

The Taliban would not have gained control of the idyllic Swat Valley, once known as the Switzerland of Asia, if Swat had remained sovereign and the Wali still ruled – at least that’s Aurangzeb’s view.

VIDEO: Former Swat ruler: 'revenge' motivates Taliban

Nonetheless, he blames former President Pervez Mushrraf and the United States for the bulk of Pakistan’s troubles with the Taliban.

"They should not have involved Pakistan in Afghanistan’s affairs. If they (the U.S.) wanted to bomb Afghanistan, they could have done it from America," he said.

"Pakistan produced the Taliban to help America throw the Russians out. And then Musharraf stabbed them in the back to please the Americans. Now the Taliban are taking revenge," said Aurangzeb, with a raised voice for added emphasis. "Revenge is a very important factor. They (the Taliban) have been let down by Pakistan."

He claims Musharraf allowed the Taliban to grow in strength in order to frighten President George W. Bush into giving him more money and weapons. 

‘People just ran’
Aurangzeb left Swat in April – just before the Pakistan army launched an offensive to clear the Swat Valley of local Taliban militants. More than two million people fled the fighting, but they didn’t run away from the Taliban, he explained. The Taliban already lived there.

"They ran away from the army," he insisted. "They (the army) would tell a village to vacate in one hour. Now tell me if someone would tell me to vacate this house within one hour, can I do it? So the people just ran."

Aurangzeb follows the news out of Swat from his home in Islamabad – a spacious two story house filled with fine furniture and carpets. The house also chronicles several generations of family history through photographs of Aurangzeb’s ancestors, his seven children, his grandchildren, and even snapshots of relatives with numerous heads of state – including President John F. Kennedy. 

Aurangzeb describes his father, the former ruler of Swat Valley, as a benevolent autocrat. 

"Ask anyone, even our enemies," he said. The valley was peaceful when his family ruled the area, he said. Justice was quick and fair based on a system he described as a combination of Islamic law and common sense. 

"If someone was arrested and told to go to jail, he went to jail. Now people are fed up with the justice, cases never finish and the courts are corrupt." It’s the lack of justice that angers Aurangzeb the most and the reason why he believes that people eventually accepted the Taliban.

But Aurangzeb is quick to point out that he doesn’t support the Taliban. What he wants is a proper democratic system and a proper judicial system – for Swat and for all of Pakistan. "We are among the top ten corrupt countries in the world."

How is it, he points out, that a policeman who takes a bribe of about ten cents, is dismissed and sent to jail and a person who takes billions of dollars in kickbacks gets away with it.

"Is that fair?" he asked.  "And the Taliban exploited that, which is why they became heroes of sorts – they stood up and said this is unfair."

Waiting for the Internet
Aurangzeb is making plans to return to his home in Swat in the next few weeks – as soon as the Internet is back up and the electricity is back on. His house is intact – just shrapnel here and there, or so he was told.

"The army killed my old servant," he said. "When I asked someone why, they said people were saying his son was a Taliban. You see, they (the army) couldn’t get the son so they killed the father."

Aurangzeb is not optimistic about the future of Swat. The army offensive may be over for now, but he says people don’t feel secure: "It’s an insurgency and you will find there are very few insurgencies that have been crushed in the world."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

wali swat seems to be prudent person. these are the honest old timers who knew the psyche of the region and did a good job to keep peace and to some extent prosperity in the region by caring and sharing. We need to support more people like this who are really connected with the local populations and understand the environment and are moderate in their views. Unfortunately dictators over the years have cutt-off the connections in order to take control of human and economic resources of the region to satisfy there agendas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miangul_Adnan_Aurangzeb
Miangul Adnan Aurangzeb

Miangul Adnan Aurangzeb is the heir apparent to the pretendership of the former Swat. He is the son of Miangul Aurangzeb and grandson of Miangul Jahan Zeb the last royal ruler of Swat. He graduated from Aitchison College, an elite Pakistani secondary school. He is a professional civil engineer who studied in the United States at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. He has served in the Pakistani Parliament. He is married to his cousin Zainab Ayub Khan, the daughter of Capt. Gohar Ayub Khan and both are grandchildren of Pakistan President Gen. Muhammed Ayub Khan. He and his wife Zainab are currently active in assistance to refugees near Islamabad from the states which were under his grandfather's dominion: Swat, Buner and Shangla. There are also efforts by the family in assistance to the United Nations High Commission for Refugees and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement with fundraising and delivery. Miangul Adnan Aurangzeb is currently working towards the construction of the Kohala Dam in Kashmir with a Chinese–Pakistani consortium. The consortium has expressed interest in bidding for the development of windfarms in the family's former dominion. There are also plans to promote the area as a textile production center; the area produces silk and has workshops for finishing pashmina woolen shawls, curtains and blankets. There are now ongoing discussions for the creation of a Royal Swat Institute for Alternative Dispute Resolution and a system of Lok Adalat to assist in the relief of the backlog in the Swat civil administrations courts. There is potential for economic, social and spiritual revival and progress in the former Swat princely state and the family remain concerned and involved.

You have your facts wrong and you are wrong about revenge too.  The Pakistan ISI, the Taliban, and bin Laden attacked the USA on 9-11-01.  I guess the Taliban must think people are suppose to forget that.
The tragedy of terrorism in Swat is twofold which Waliahad sahib i.e.               Miangul Aurangzeb has briefly covered. The first tragedy took place on 29th July, 1969 when the princely state of Swat and a progressive unit of self rule was dismantled by a military dictator against the wishes of the people of Swat. The second tragedy started when Pakistan became one of the international webs of terrorism after the ghost war in Afghanistan was started in 1979 and another illegitimate dictator became accomplice. General Musharaf continued committing the crime against humanity.

The question is:

Was it not the right of the people of Swat not to have been deprived of their home grown system of self rule and enjoying the level of natural justice which was much higher than what was elsewhere in Pakistan? And

Was it not a case of non complementariness against nature to merge Swat and deprive the indigenous population of its God given resources and their own system of governance which was much closer to the natural law of universal complementariness (NATURAL JUSTICE) than elsewhere in Pakistan?

Most of the readers may not know that the princely state of Swat was founded by the people of Swat in 1917 and they chose Miangul Abdul Wadud Gulshahzada as their ruler in 1918 at the time when the valley formed a complex but stateless society of several hundred thousand people linked to the archaic cosmopolitanism of inner Asia but hardly touched by centuries of external influence. The valley had never ever been seen by any English man before 1895.The nearest road contact with the outside world was Malakand, the seat of political agent of the British Empire, 156 kilometers away from Saidu Sharif, the capital of the new born state of Swat.

The first school was built by Badshah Sahib, the founding father Miangul Abdul Wadud Gul shahzada which was later on developed into a huge network of free education up to degree level for all by his son Miangul Jahanzeb who became the wali of Swat when Badshah Sahib abdicated in his favour on 12th December, 1949 and out which over 200 schools were decimated recently by the terrorists.

Infrastructure of beautiful roads, free medical care for all, system of quick justice and many more features of natural justice which the people of Swat enjoyed for half a century have become fairy tales for our children when they hear.

By relating this bits and pieces of information I want to tell the readers that a modern princely State had been raised from ground zero by the rulers who were people of vision and wisdom. I solute them.

More details are available about the story of terrorism in Swat in a chapter in my book" TERRORISTS ARE BORN WHEN THE PAIRS BREAK" which is under the process of printing in USA and the U.K. and will be released within two months.

With my prayers for Miangul Aurangzeb, the Wali of Swat,
Engineer Abdul Ghafoor Khan
from Riyadh
I have beeen deeply studying the afghan situation since russian invasion and i agree wuth this part of the problem ecplained by mr mian gul. America must understand that the pashtoons on both sides of the durand line have been victimised by the hypocracy of pakistani leadership. they have exploited every situation to favour the ruler class in pakistan wich is more are less punjabis ans urdu spaeking migrated from india at the independence of pakistan and later on as well. they have no sinceretywith and do not understan the pashtoon problems. they want money to liveup their corupt life. The best way to fight terorism in this region is to help pashtoon by educating him and providing him his rights of self determinatin.
A wonderful ma, Miangul! A very well written article. It shows how lucid are the Wali's thoughts about his beloved SWAT.
The Talaban must be confronted now. Talaban has gained strength everytime they are let off the hook.  Tora bora is the greatest example.  Comfront this extremest cause now ,will bring peace to the Swat and region...
Enough with the 9-11 occurence...We know it happened and we know who did it.  Let it die already and let the dead rest...people died and yes it was in a tragic manner, but it happens all the time.  All you have to do is crack open a history book and look at present news reports to see that.  What you fail to grasp in your seemingly all consuming anger and self-righteousness is that this...wait for it...ISN'T ABOUT 9-11!  It's in the past...let it stay there.  I'm not saying forget about the event, just don't bring it up when it has no bearing on the situation at hand.
Don't forget the Taliban, and Bin Laden are the same, they brought the war to America. They won't stop terrorizing people until they get their way.  This guy should have thought about using his influence to keep these cowards out of his valley.  But isn't that how it works, the USA is always the bad guy, and people like him are so much smarter and humanitarian then us americans that give aid and comfort to nations that blame us for their own problems. Of course that aid going their way is exchange with bullets, and bombs conmming ourway.  I say we stop giving aid to these guys who critize america, and blow them to hell if they threaten the USA again.
Amazing that the author of the article uses this elderly man to rationalize, justify and apologize for the monstrous violence unleashed by the Taliban. The vast majority of people from the Swat Valley were oppressed and brutalized by the Taliban after they invaded and conquered it. The estimated 2 million people who fled when the armed forces of the democratic nation of Pakistan counter-attacked, left because either they didn't want to be caught in the cross-fire or they didn't want to become hostages of, or human shields for the Taliban. What was the purpose of this article? I'm sure there were people in WW II who had nice things to say about the Nazis.
It's okay to bring up the Soviet Afghan conflict but not a much more recent event in which 3000 civilians were murdered?So sorry but 9/11 is the justification for our efforts against the Taliban and al-Queda.They drew first blood!
Hopefully, by the end of the 21st Century, the United States government will elect some outstanding leaders who will get us out of this gigantic mess we have gotten ourselved into. Americans don't need to be running all over the world sticking their noses into everyone's smelly business.  We have way too many problems to resolve in our own country, and we also have Homeland Security, which, if run properly, will protect us from the worst terrorist attacks from enemies foreign and domestic.  

Hopefully, by 2050, we will have awakened unto the reality that the most important country in the world for Americans should be the United States of America.  Let other countries take care of their own problems.  Let's start directing our time, energy, talent and money to fixing our own highways instead of trying to figure out what someone elses' "road map" should be.
He isn't rationalizing it or justifying it Douglas. He is simply stating the actual history. It is quite true that the USA paid for the Taliban which were developed by the Pakistanis. This was done to fight the Russians when the Russians occupied Afghanistan.

If you want to be successful at dealing with a problem, first you have to understand it in total.
On the one hand, I see and I hope the world sees that this is what happens when you attack the United States on it's own soil.  It was a mistake for Bin Laden and the Taliban to believe that there would be no retaliation for such a foolish attack.  The U.S. posseses the weaponry and the resolve to respond to this brutality 1000 fold.

In the long term, although I sincerely believe that an honest effort should have been made to kill Osama Bin Laden and his evil minions, I think there is a point where the mission must turn from one of punishment and revenge (which was due) to one of understanding of the political climate, culture, and needs of the people in the region.  

Ultimately, education and economic development in these regions will be what eliminates extremism, not bombs and bullets.  
I never understood why the Americans CHASED the Taliban into Pakistan, insted of cutting them off. Three decades earlier, didn't they destabilise Cambodia by doing something like they are doing now, giving Pol Pot the opportunity he was waiting for?
When good and thoughtful men come together for a dialogue it is very educational as I have read here and learned. The detrious postings fall away as the educated responses hold sway. thank you Abul and all the others who have informed me intelligently.
people who think that 9-11 is the first thing that set this entire mess off needs to get to a library and do some research.  This story has been evolving and growing for decades.  we messed up by being too afraid of the soviet union to commit ourselves to war with them so we hand our fight off to afghanis who thought we were there to truly help..... what happened when it was done?  WE LEFT them by themselves.  i would be pissed too
John Toradze wrote “If you want to be successful at dealing with a problem, first you have to understand it in total.”

While true, there are layers upon layers when dealing with unfamiliar cultures.

I would first of all suggest that you try to not think in terms of state structures such as “Afghanistan” or “Pakistan”, but think in terms of “Pushtan”, “Hazara”, “Farsiwan”, and the many other peoples living in this region. That would perhaps contextualize Wadood Bacha’s comments above.

But even this does not get down to the “quwm” (communal group) level, the primary level of allegiance in this region.

It may also be useful to distinguish between the “mujahideen” and the “Taliban”.

The US CIA financed (through Pakistan) the mujahideen to fight the Soviets and their puppet government (Najibullah) in Afghanistan. This was an extremely cost effective means to put financial, military, and political pressure on the USSR and was the primary reason for the disintegration of the Soviet system and the end of the “Cold War”. Of course this also introduced additional sophisticated weapons and tactical experience into an already violent region and provided a training ground for Islamists from around the larger Muslim region including Osama Bin Laden.

After the fall of the Najibullah government, the various ethnic groups continued their age long factional civil war with outside states supporting their ethnic or religious brethren. The Pushtans in Pakistan supported the Pushtan factions (Hekmatyar, Amin, Rasoul and later the Taliban). Uzbeks in Uzbekistan supported Uzbeks in Northern Afghanistan, Tajiks supported Tajiks, Shia Iran supported Shia Farsiwan and Hazara peoples, etc.

The Taliban first appeared in October of 1994 and seem to have originated in the Pushtan mahrasahs (religious schools) on the Pakistan side of the Durand line.

A good general history of Afghanistan from the 19th Century until 2000 is Afghanistan’s Endless War by Larry P. Goodson.
Those who speak with vengence should know that the taliban is not monolithic as a group. These( a minority of disgruntled swatis) are folks who joined the taliban movement looking for a possible separation from the corrupt systems of Pakistan and years of economic and political neglect by the westren supported dictators and politicians playing with fake religious leaders in the region . With a vacum of regional political and economic choas in the region, it was easy for outsiders to exploit them under one guise or another. The great majority did not join the Taliban but stayed sort of neutral as a captive crowd stuck between a rock (taliban) and a hard place (wheelers and dealers - Pakistani dictators, westren urge to support blindly dictators to defeat the soviets, corrupt pakistani politicians, fake religious right wing extremists)


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2031724

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.