ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



When the Bee Gees were the anthem of Chinese reform

Posted: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:37 AM
Filed Under:

Eric Baculinao is the NBC News Beijing Bureau Chief. He first moved to China from the Philippines in 1971 as a member of a visiting youth delegation and has lived in China ever since.

BEIJING – I remember the palpable air of excitement in our school as the news began to trickle in.

Thirty years ago, on Dec. 18, 1978, a pivotal secret meeting of China's Communist Party leadership began, concluding in a decisive victory for Deng Xiaoping.

Image: Eric Baculinao, center of back row, in a 1970's group photo outside of Mao's village home.
Courtesy Eric Baculinao
Eric Baculinao, center of back row, in a 1970's group photo outside of Mao's village home.

The party's decision to shift the country's focus to economic modernization marked the beginning of China's new era of open door policies and economic reform. But for foreign students like us, there was a more practical, immediate cause for celebration

Confused’ gatekeeper
Deng was popular because he symbolized open-mindedness and pragmatism, as opposed to the Maoist radicalism and isolationism of the past. Foreign students in Beijing took Deng's political ascendancy as a signal, at last, for throwing away restrictions and relating with China and the Chinese people in a new and normal way.

For weeks, my dormitory on the campus of the Beijing Language Institute pulsated with dance parties, as if Boney M and the Bee Gees were the anthem of reform.

The restrictive system of curfews and gate registration – that effectively barred Chinese guests or Chinese girl friends during late hours – broke down. I once asked the old gatekeeper why he was no longer doing the job of screening and registering guests.

"It's supposed to be open-door now," he said. "I'm not sure, I'm confused."

Xidan Democracy Wall and the missing modernization
Deng's victory immediately emboldened many Beijing citizens to freely express their pent-up views on the wrongs of the past with declarations posted on the long brick wall located on the shopping street of Xidan.

The so-called Xidan Democracy Wall, which existed from early 1978 to late 1979, would turn out to be a transformative political event, which presaged the enduring conflict between the open economy and the closed politics that Deng espoused, that would play out in a more dramatic fashion with the 1989 Tiananmen uprising.

We visited the Democracy Wall a few times, attracted by the unprecedented political debates, as well as the chance to improve our Chinese.

 "We need no gods or emperors…Freedom and happiness are our sole objectives," declared Wei Jingsheng, China's foremost dissident and author of the document "Fifth Modernization," which urged that democracy be added to the four modernizations program that only included industry, agriculture, technology and military.

Deng used the Democracy Wall movement to pressure and oust his Maoist opponents, but when the spearhead turned to Deng himself, the Democracy Wall was banned, and Wei himself ended up in jail, accused of trying to subvert communist rule. Wei spent almost 18 years in prison, before he was deported to the United States for a life of exile.

Image: Xidan today has the Bank of China as landmark.
Eric Baculinao / NBC News
The Democracy Wall is long gone; Xidan today has the Bank of China as a landmark instead.


‘Charlie Two Shoes’ and finding a 'common ground'
I began working for NBC News under Beijing Bureau Chief Sandy Gilmour soon after the bureau opened in late 1982. One memorable story we did was that of Charlie Two Shoes, which illustrates how China dealt with Western media in the early years of the open-door policy.

In 1946, U.S. Marines stationed in China during World War II adopted an 11-year-old boy and nicknamed him "Charlie Two Shoes" because that was easier to pronounce than his real name Tsui Chi Hsii. Charlie lived and learned English from his Marine buddies until 1949, when the Communist revolution forced the Americans out of China.
 
Charlie Two Shoes suffered imprisonment and humiliation as a suspected U.S. spy, but he clung on to his hopes. And true enough, by 1983, Charlie reestablished contact with his buddies, who in turn devised a plan to invite him to America.

Finding Charlie and obtaining media access was a challenge, as his village and vast areas of Shandong province remained off-limits to foreigners, even after four years of the open-door policy.

We negotiated repeatedly with the local government, and eventually we found common ground, convincing them that the story would benefit the newly re-established relations between the United States and China.

But there were compromises. We agreed not to venture into Charlie's village, but that rather the local government would transport him to Tsingdao, where Sandy could interview him for an exclusive report. We covered Charlie's departure for America, where he was joined years later by his family. The lesson of his story became an important guide for future news gathering in China.

VIDEO: Three young Chinese reflect on what 30 years of economic reform has meant to them.

Deng and Mao: the unconventional wisdom
When Deng passed away in 1997, his legacy as the architect of China's reform appeared secure.

It is conventional wisdom to credit Deng for China's rising power and prosperity today.  But one question still remains, why did Deng insist to the very end that his predecessor, Mao Zedong, who instigated the disastrous Cultural Revolution, remained 70 percent correct, and only 30 percent wrong?

A review of China's party history and the Sino-Soviet split in the 60s would seem to yield one explanation.

Deng came at just the right historical moment. It can be argued that had Deng become China's leader at an earlier stage, his capitalist-oriented "economy first" program would have brought him close to the Soviet leaders who tried similar reform after the death of Stalin.

Seeking independence from the Soviets, Mao raised the primacy of ideology over economics – which led to the Cultural Revolution – but he also instigated a global strategic maneuver that brought China closer to America and the West in an anti-Soviet united front.

In a sense, Deng's capitalist reform and open-door policies, which envisaged closer cooperation with the West, only became possible because of the anti-Soviet independence and strategic platform that Mao had built.

‘Thirty years east of the river…’
Today, China is still grappling with Deng's legacy. The nation is at a "crossroads," said Hu Xingdou, outspoken professor of economics at the Beijing Institute of Technology.

Despite a decade of economic boom, the current crisis and growing unrest is overshadowing the anniversary of the start of Deng’s reforms. Hu likened China's transition to a Chinese saying, "30 years east of the river, 30 years west of the river."

"In the past 30 years, China has achieved progress but has also accumulated a great deal of contradictions," he explained.

"It is a moment of serious test, either the contradictions will cause greater turmoil, or they will lead to greater opening and reform, reform not just of economics, but political reform, institutional reform and democracy," he added.

Recent World Blog posts from Beijing:
Amid growing unrest, will China change its ways?
China begins to feel economic squeeze
China's $586 billion plan - is it enough?

 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Today, China is still at a crossroads of political reform, institutional reform and democracy.- esp. the political reform.
Like all empires, including the United States, China is controlled by a vast and corrupt political system.  Essentally a new nobility.  This new nobility is propped up and controlled by the moneyed interests of the world.  If we truly wanted to solce the world economic crisis we could do what rulers did within monarchies throughout history.  Sieze the assets of the wealthy of the world, or at least half of their assets.  It is estimated that the wealthy control at least 40 trillion dollars of the worlds wealth.  I think that the economic and social woes of the world could be vastly nuetralized with 20 trillion.  
This would have happened in 1950 instead of 1980, if political idiot General McArthur didn't start Korea war (President Truman fired him right, now we know.)
A COUNTRY WITH CULTURE (REAL WRITTEN CULTURE) CANNOT BE CHANGED OR CONQUERED EASILY. You have to "brainwash" them for a long time. This is also why Bush failed in Iraq. When he declare "Mission accomplished!", I couldn't help laughing. He had no ideal that was only the beginning of the job because Iraq is a country with culture, not a savage county. Bush was a C student at school who doesn't do homework. So he had good intention starting the war but did C student job at Iraq also, like McArthur.

After reading Joyce Chang's book on Mao it's amazing to me that Mao's huge photo is still hanging in Tiananmen Square.  This guy's a hero!  When are the Chinese people going to condemn this monster?
You people are so biased against Mao. We built a nuclear bomb under Mao's leadership while China was the poorest country on earth. We even had to import matches at that time. I just discovered that 30 years after Mao Zedong's era, we still can't produce anything which we couldn't produce 30 years ago. What Deng Xiaoping has done other than turn China into a greedy, polluted country without any credibility?
Hey Communist - you forgot to mention that Mao is credited with killing 40 million of his own people. Who really cares about matches numbskull
China does need some major reform in its political arena.  This is because as it's ideology has now been replaced by capitalistic thinking, majority of the Chinese now are able to develop their own opinion of any national or international issues.  The government blocking of many internet websites (again) goes to show that great number of Chinese are now not relying on the country's only Party news outlet instead they are actualy going out of their way to find news that are unfiltered.  Take Tibet for instance.  Even though Xinghua and other CCP's media outlet continues to show their version of History, mainlanders are now becoming more and more restless and thus are going out to look for the truth (not facts) themselves.
China's single party system will not go on for long as more and more Chinese are exposed to the outside world, the government will soon eventually will not be able to regulate every move of its citizen.
Every nation & everyone wants wealth, power, regardless of party(Republican, Democrats, Socialist Parties, Communist Parties). Govts are the same, results speak for itself.    
It is kind of funny that none really believes communism in China, but the leaders are still keep the stupid flag on. That is causing psychological twisting of all Chinese in that country.
Hey, Ray Rust from Westminster, CA

Do you expect a guy escape from China would like to say something good about the former leader of China?
I heard a former US soldier now living in North Korea said he loves N Korea and Kim's family more than the States, but I would not think that represents most of US people.
Lobsang sounds like a name came from Xizang, or more common to be called Tibet.

Just share with you, the British declared that they see Tibet as a part of China resently, Althrough they invaded Tibet last century and creat the so called "Tibet Independce" issue. By the way, I visited the Tibetan castle which used for fighting against British at Jiangzi(Not sure about the exact English name of that place), did you visited?
To Lobsang, Look at our own U.S. Government and tell me we don't need some changes. Part of the suffering of a growing nation or one great nation emerging from it's own self inflicted cacoon. It will make it.
To all of that who bespatter China.I have a question have you ever been in China or did you have a deepthly understanding of China. If you not,I think you'd better shut up.Because you don't konw how complex the Chinese situation is.I accept that Chinese politic system have some blemishes.But as we seen advantage is bigger than disadvantage. Moreover,there have no perfect politic system in this word.Even the Uncle Sam.
"All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others."
It is Freedom of speech??????Laughing!!!!!
Danny's right.  All governments seek to perpetuate their own power.  So that's normal.  This is why it is  important to have a 'division of power' within the government framework.  

Deng Xiaoping accomplished something similar in China.  After the cult of Mao, Deng rearranged the positions of (CCP)Party Leader and President of the government into two separate entities, to be held by two different persons.

China will - someday - take the next step and offer a variety of politically independent parties.  When she is ready.  

As for right now, in my opinion, the country is nowhere near ready for such a move.  A democratic and just society is more than merely having political options.  

Economic growth has been the top priority, as it should have been.  And for the past 5+ years, the government has been moving steadily on the next important areas, poverty and widening the development.  And now the government is beginning to address the environment.  

All in all, well done and a worthy follow-up to Deng's great leadership.
Reading the book by Jung Chang or even a hundred by different authors so as to have an unbias and diverse collections of views on China and even questioning local Chinese experts will not shed the true light on the irony of why Mao's picture is still held aloft in prominent places in spite of millions dying and suffering to unimaginable extent during his reign but to digress a little, we know that in Europe, Russia and USA, millions died as a result of regional conflicts, civil wars and plagues under not too few machiavellian tyrants and incompetent despotic rulers. The sufferings of a nation cannot in anyway be attributed to any single individual leader.  Without the support of similar minded individuals, most goals to harness citizens' loyalty and inspire them to any ideology would fall apart at the seams before they see the light of day.

Still, not to deviate too much, one gets the impression like most Asians, Chinese people have infinite memories of are very forgiving but remember harms done to them by their own and foreigners.  A recent case in point is Nanjing.  Today Japanese investment is still welcomed in China in spite of what the history books say.  

However, what is most important to mainstream chinese throughout the ages is that national priority and overall good seem always to be the orders of the day rather than individual benefit, a word that is apt is probably, sacrifice.  That possibly explains why mainland Chinese people, and to some degree overseas Chinese, are resilient and ingenious people who find ways to move forward if they can if.  The best example of such characteristic in a Chinese is the incomparable economic genius and visionary icon, Deng Xiao Ping.  Although the humiliation and penalties he was subjected to during the cultural revolution pales in comparison to some of his peers, Deng ambitions and goals if he revealed any were very close to not being realised not to mention the dire circumstances his family were in.  Yet, when he returned to power, he quickly brushed off the ill experience and embarked on economic programmes resulting in the astounding results which are seen today. Nothing in the sphere of economics is perfect as we have seen in the numerous corporate collapses worldwide for the last twenty years and there are misgivings about by products and adverse consequences of the fast paced reforms initiated by Deng.  But if did not provide the catalytical changes in southern China, the social and political scenes which are connected to economic progress in China today would have been far more miserable and chaotic.  Deng fixed the tap but it was one in which valves were missing  to control the flow.



To the Chinese, what matters is that they must survive through hardships by forgetting immediate disputes, which China has seen one too many; they have learnt that to dwell on the past could harm rest of the welfare of the clans and taint the overall picture.  Chinese people unite in great catastrophes and disunite in minor disputes resulting in them being quickly disadvantaged by others.  That is the irony of being Chinese.
It is always amazing to me that people who have no concept of the Chinese culture make such uninformed and incorrect assumptions.  As my mother-in-law would say, "you put down a watermelon and pick up a peanut."  

It really does not matter who is in control of the Chinese government or what type of government it is - the dictates of the culture will remain the same as they have for 5,000 years.  You can study it, and analyze it, and interpret it, and expound upon it, and you will never understand it.  Americans have been told by the Chinese people, "we work for the Communist government because the Communist government works for us."  That is not mutually exclusive of the desire for the benefits of Capitalism, which many seem to confuse with Democracy.  That is why Deng's philosophy and place in Chinese history is so confusing to outsiders.
By the way, Eric, the place that Charlie Two Shoes was taken could not have been Tsingdao.  It would either have to be Tsing Tao (old spelling and still the name of a great beer) or Qing Dao (current spelling).  

I just hate to find small errors like that - makes me question the validity of the entire article.
You want real Chinese Reform?  Look up "Federalism in China" on Wikipedia.  China is now the only large country in the world without a federal form of government.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1720172

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.