ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Captured by pirates, ship captain recounts ordeal

Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:48 AM
Filed Under:

NBC News’ Charlene Gubash interviewed Mahmoud Hammad, an Egyptian captain whose ship was hijacked by Somali pirates. He gives a first-hand account of the 23-day ordeal he and his crew went through.  

CAIRO – Egyptian Captain Mahmoud Hammad quickly dispelled any notion that Somali pirates treat their captives well.       

"Any movement and they would put a gun to our heads or in our sides," he said of the pirates who seized his ship. "Every second, we didn't know what would happen next." 

Hammad was transporting a cargo of cement from Karachi to Djibouti with his 24 shipmates aboard the Mansoura, an Egyptian-owned, Panama-flagged ship, when pirates struck.

"On the third of September at 7:20 a.m., pirates surrounded us in two small boats, seven men to a boat. When we saw them, we rang the alarm bell to warn the crew." 

Image: Mahmoud Hammad
NBC News/Mohamed Muslemany
Captain Mahmoud Hammad, safe and sound back in Cairo after his 23-day pirate ordeal. 

The captain’s first thought: "How can we resist them? They have weapons. I have nothing. The second thought was that I wanted the crew to be safe. They threatened to hit us with rocket-propelled grenades and sink us if we didn’t stop." 

The crew grabbed high-pressure fire hoses and began shooting water to sink the small boats, just as they had been trained to do. But water was no match for bullets. 

'Then the pirates climbed on board'
"When the pirates shot twice in the air, everyone dropped the hoses and ran to their cabins," said Hammad as he began to recount how the ship was seized. "Then the pirates climbed on board and began to round up the crew. Two men were missing and the pirates said they would shoot them if they didn’t come out. We found the men sleeping in their cabins and brought them up. 

"They put three of the crew to work on the engines and told me to take the bridge.  They locked the rest in one cabin. Then they went through the ship’s cabins and stole everything belonging to the crew and broke into the safe and stole the money. 

"When we finally dropped anchor off the northern coast of Somalia, I asked them to split the crew up between two cabins because 21 men locked in one cabin would suffocate.  They agreed and separated them in two cabins." 

Meanwhile a British warship followed them for six hours at a distance of five miles, aware that the Egyptian ship had been captured. The pirates were fearful, but the British ship did not interfere. Hammad’s spirits were raised at the comforting presence of the ship, but soon dashed.

"I had hoped they would at least see the process and stop me," said Hammad. "At least if they stopped me in international waters they could have protected me, but they let me go to the pirate’s home where he has support."

‘When the food finished, we had even bigger problems’
When they arrived in Somalia, 25 more pirates boarded the ship in addition to the original 14, each armed with a Kalashnikov and a handgun, and a total of three RPG launchers.  They were all young, between 20 to 26 years of age, with no apparent affiliations to Somalia’s many militias, said Hammad. "They are fugitives. They are not from any tribe or faction in Somalia.  They are wanted men running from the law. They hurt the entire region." The pirates’ isolation became painfully obvious when they ran short of food and water.

With 35 extra mouths to feed, the ship’s provisions dwindled quickly. "When the water finished we had problems with them. When the food finished, we had even bigger problems." 

The pirates had no one on the mainland to re-supply them.  At first, they demanded the captain buy food and water. But he told them they had stolen the $15,000 intended to buy food.  The pirates told him they had already spent it all on qat, a mild narcotic popular in Somalia. 

"Finally they went to get food," said Hammad. "God knows if they stole it or what. But they would bring live sheep or goats, flour and sugar. We would do the butchering. They didn’t know anything. They only wanted two things: qat and money."

In the pirates lair
The pirates forced the captain to sail to Eyl, a coastal town in Northern Puntland that has become a pirate haven where many captured ships await release. Hammad noted about 11 ships from such countries as Malaysia, Japan and Iran. 

Once at ease in their lair, the pirates began to demand a ransom of $3 million. Hammad became the middleman in high-stakes negotiations that would determine their survival. For 13 tense days, from 10 p.m. until 3 a.m. Hammad, who was in direct contact with a member of Egyptian intelligence and the ship’s owner, bargained them down. 

"We told them the cement is ruined and nobody will want it. They will throw it in the sea. You damaged our ship’s equipment and now the ship won’t be worth its full price. So they came down to $2 million. I said no Egyptian will pay that price for the ship. They will say keep the ship and we will take the crew because they belong to their country.   The pirates finally came down to $600,000 and the ship’s owner agreed to the price."

How do you get ransom money to outlaws?
Hammad thought his problems were over but a new set of obstacles arose: how to get the money into the pirates’ hands. The pirates’ outlaw status and lack of affiliation to Somali or foreign groups prevented them from going inland to pick up the ransom or having it transferred to an account or individual. 

"They don’t want to take their money from a bank, from inside the country, from outside the country. There was nobody to provide an ID number, nobody to go and get the ransom," explained Hammad. "The owner of the boat is telling them the ransom is with so and so in Somalia. They say they can’t go and take it.  They say, ‘If I go to that area, they will have my head.’"

Tempers flared as the pirates waited for the ransom to be delivered. They told the captain they had only taken his boat because they couldn’t find an oil tanker. Anxious to make money, the pirates fought over the fate of their hostages.  

"They used to fight amongst themselves with guns every day on the ship. One of them was wounded when they were fighting." Hammad explained that the Egyptian crew administered first aid to one of their captors who had a bullet wound in his head.

"They fought every day because the time drew on and no ransom. Some of them wanted to sink our ship and kill the crew. But we knew they wanted the ransom." They ominously warned the captain that they had already murdered a Malaysian crew before sinking their ship.    

Finally, a member of Egyptian intelligence flew by private jet to the town of Galcaio near Eyl with the ransom paid by the ship’s owner. Two days later recounts the captain, the crew was freed after a 23-day ordeal.

 ‘The solution is international, not personal’
"I am happy to be alive. They took everything from us, money, mobile phones, clothes, presents we were bringing our children. It doesn’t matter. The problem is the horror we saw. It was not an easy thing. When will I forget it? Of course it took a big psychological toll on all of us, young and old alike. We saw things that made us say maybe we will die the next second. Maybe they will pick me and say "Come here," and they will shoot me."     

Hammad has not worked since, although he has been asked repeatedly to sail the same waters.  "When the route is safe, I will go, but not until then."

He insists that only decisive action by the international community will end piracy. "My advice is not to other captains. What can captains do? My advice is to NATO. They should give a powerful response. The law requires them to protect shipping lanes. Where is their response?  They have to see where these things are coming from and stop. You have to strike them, and not let them enter the water." 

Egypt obliges all sailors to take a self-defense course, but Hammad believes such measures fail to deter piracy. "All of us took the same course. It is not useful. The solution is international, not personal. Nobody can take an individual action against them. There are two things: Either he will kill you or he will die. When they kill them, then the problem will be solved."

Related link: Pirates chase, open fire on U.S. cruise ship

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I agree with setting up trap boats, manned by the military.  
On our aircraft, pilots are now carrying guns, in addition to having armed air marshalls.  Why can't ships also be armed?
Can countries just cut off trade to these areas of the world?

I say atack them where they live and put a stop to this now!  We went to war with the Barbary coast Pirates many years ago with a lot less technology.  We should be able to wipe out these Pirates in short order with the technology we have today!  
If attacks are perpetrated by only a handful of fairly stupid street thugs at any one time, what's wrong with the collective intelligence of government and private sector representatives?  Or are their policies a reflection of our current domestic  economic woes. Arm the crews or provide armed escorts - we do that on airlines dont't we? The US should take strong action to protect their own, even if the rest of the world doesn't.
Ninjas. A Ninja would beat a pirate in any scenario, well, except at sea...

Seriously, Convoys. 1 warship for a cluster of 10-20 cargo ships. a lone cargo ship miles from any help defines 'Sitting Duck'. One military ship in firing range, including indirect fire. The 'blind side' isn't that much of an issue as modern weapons can basically shoot around corners, just give each cargo ship crew a few laser target designators, and the warship just has to shoot upwards, and a missile can just follow the little (infra)red dot.

One ship should be sufficent for a deterrent.

Don't need to fully arm each crew, and each ship just has to pay 1/10th to 1/20th of the cost of the escort;

But I'm sure some companies will skimp, and try to keep margins up by sending out unescorted ships; just like they fly under the flag of the country with the lowest taxes.

Having a Dog/Gun/Alarm system won't stop a determined burgler; he'll just target you neighbor that dosn't have those.
This is a no brainer. Hire armed guards. The cost of armed guards would be cheaper than the ransom they are paying these theif's. Why we are allowing this is beyond me. The British ship in this case should have fired on the freighter and stopped it. Why are they there if they are not going to interfere. Doesn't make any sense.
CIA coordinating with other governments in the area should be training the proper factions to bring back a formidable government in Somalia and this crap wouldn't keep happening.

The problem is once these crews are brought to shore you can't really attack these pirate liars they may use the captured crewman as human shields. The nations that have ships captured should negotiate the return of these ships and crew that are there now.

In the mean time use technology and put together some hi tech bait ships with Special Forces and attack the speed boats and so called mother ships while also providing security on board these tankers. Once the pirates see resistance and it's not a walk in the park this may thwart the heists long enough to get some security of these ships in place.

What would 3 million in security buy vs. paying it in ransom? That's ridicules whoever owns these boats protect their crew and assets accordingly! This isn't rocket science to figure out these are freaking pirates. The drugged up thugs are smarter then international forces and NATO??
This is rather unbelievable in our modern day society...
have good governsment &sucure in somalia not coropt abdulahi yussuf he is the proplem not solusion
Arming the vessel's crews is very unlikely. These are merchant vessels crewed by civilians, employed by shipping companies who pinch every penny they spend on their vessels. If the pirates are smart they will treat the crews well and not harm them, giving the crews every incentive to remain passive if they are caught. Few if any crews are going to risk their lives to save a hunk of steel and a cargo that they have no stake in.

Armed guards sound like a good idea until you realize the huge numbers of ships that pass through these waters every day. Putting a guard on each ship is going to be expensive, plus, how do you make sure that the guards are trustworthy? One problem in fighting piracy is knowing who is on which side. Crew members have been known to give out positions to their friends among the pirates - easy enough to do with a hand held GPS and a radio.

A stable government ashore along with an economy that can support the population is the only real solution. It will be difficult to bring about, and will require assistance from all interested parties, but it IS possible.

No, I am not suggesting that the pirates should get off scott-free. If caught by the authorities they should be tried, then hanged from the nearest yardarm and left to rot in the East African sun.
Decoy ship with mercenaries on board.  When approached, kill and sink the pirates with no editorials or news reports.  Attract more, kill and sink more.  They'll go away, quietly in one fashion or another, dead or wondering what happened.

And, if you read about it in a report from 'an unnamed source', kill him too.
By all means a decision should be taken to track all these useless elements in the high seas who are doing this harm.
US and other advanced countries can team up and go to the high seas to finish them,it is very stupid of Somalia itself.If the country is poor what is the concern of others.Something should be done about this matter as soon as possible otherwise the crew members are suffering very much in the hands of these pirates.
Aaaww, boo hoo, those big mean pirates.  This is just a new economy popping up just like they do here in the good 'ol USA and everywhere.  Pirates are just people who see an opportunity and want to make a buck.  Kind of like the drug trade, the human traffic trade, (both doing well here in the usa) and oh so similar to just about every American company who buys materials and labor from third-world countries for dirt cheap: To make a buck at the expense of others. Only difference is that the pirates aren't trying to candy coat their activities and they don't have their heads in the sand like wealthy economies do.  I'm about to take my AR-15 to Somalia and support those pirates. Power to the pirates!
Dear Commentors...
All this talk of defeating the pirates is nonsense...
The United States has an organization on lawyers called the A-C-L-U..  This group will hunt down anyone that deprives these pirates, er, self-employed commodity traders, their right to earn a living...
Why do you think the US is where it is today??
The A-C-L-U....
Before Thomas Jefferson sent out the Marines, Julius Caesar also had a run in with pirates.  He was held for ransom.  They asked for a certain amount.  Julius C. told the pirates to ask for more.  The ransom was paid and Julius C. returned home.  He then came back with ships and captured the pirates.  He commanded that the pirates be killed.  A governor refused.  Julius C. came and had the pirates crucified.  I am told that the Romans left bodies on crosses, and whatever the birds of the air did not pluck off and eat, the rest would eventually fall to the ground.  Only the Jews took bodies down off crosses because of their beliefs.    
Mainland China had a piracy problem a year or so ago and put a quick end to it.  All pirates were capture and publicly hanged (I think they were all Chinese).  That pretty much stopped it.  All we have to do is get a UN resolution as to punishment and publish it then carry it out.  Will stop quickly.
I get a kick out of all you Einstiens with simplistic solutions to complex problems.  You really think that the world's problems can be solved with love and/or fire power?  Geez!
Ya' know this here looks like an employment opportunity, which we need to look at in true entrepenurial spirit. We have pirates that need abatement:good. We need to form a private security firm to provide "abatement". A few weldments attached to the rails, maybe some custom protective armament stations, some M60's, LAW's and the like and we'd be in 'bidness. You guys responding above seem to have a handle on it, what say we give it a go?
Just wait! This won't continue when Obama gets in Office.  He'll give them a good talk'n and they will stop in there tracks.
what is the diffrence between what these thugs are doing and thugs breaking into are homes and stealing money and things to sell to bye drugs with. are goverment set up places to shoot up. maby they will set up a place for the somalies to pirate more efficintly or send sycitristes to see why they are doing this sort of thing i say blast them out of the water
All I can say is one word-Blackwater. Hire them on the primary targets.  If the owners can pay the ramson they can pay for protection.  Why not be proactive instead of reactive.
The excuse that Somalia is at war and poor people will do whatever they can to feed themselves.  According to the article, these pirates were nor part of any militia.  In fact, they didn't even want to go ashore to pick up the ransom.  It is mind boggling that a handful of thugs can overtake a huge ship and
demand (and receive) ransome!  And there are so many ships sitting off harbors for weeks, waiting for a
good deal ona ransome payment.  Meanwhile, the whole
world, with all it's cargo ships and military hardware sit back and watch it happen.  Surreal!
perhaps we should revist history...how did the British solve the pirate problem in the Caribbean?  And how about the demise of the Barbary Pirates?  How about the old fashoned convoy system?  
Every vessel should be equipped to defend themselves (I'm not talking about water hoses)no matter what route they travel, but NATO should also patrol. Its so strange how many warships are in the gulf of aden and this crime is still happening.
The US should protect US flagged ships that pay US taxes.  Straight and simple.  Otherwise let the ships' owners pay ransoms!!!

One way or another, they need to pay for their protection.
So there are talks of blowing them up, and then a few who think peace is the answer. One, no one will authorize attacking them, so realistically that is out of the picture. Yes, it may deter some of the actions, but I am guessing for every one you destroy 3 more will take its place. The military can not get involved, and I am assuming pirates will not listen if you talk to them. So what to do? I think the maritime laws need to be adjusted just as we adjusted for pilots to carry handguns in a cockpit. Allow small security teams with weapons capable of handling the situation. Make it for defense. Warn the pirates before they board they will be attacked. The security team stays hidden until the pirates bored the boat, then game on. Just as if someone tries to break into my house, I will defend it. If you are desperate, poor or hungry you will find a means for survival like most of the homeless do in this country without resorting to violence. However, attack me or my home as you attack these ships, and I will defend my property and family at all costs.
this is where the major countries of the region with the proper resources need to get up off of their buttocks, and deal with the problem militarily,dont sit back and wait for the u.n or the u.s.a its your territorial waters, its time you use your military for the proper reason! no deals ,no mercy ! the pirates need to know the penaty for their actions, they dont care about human rights, so dont show them any either !!!!

 I'm very surprised the international shipping community hasn't simply formed armed convoys and or armed at least some of the ships.

 In WW II The Germans had at least one raider which would be disguised as an Allied Cargo vessel they'd get
along their prey, drop the plywood  facade exposing their 5 inch naval guns, I'd think the cost for arming
the vessels would be a pittance compared to the costs
involved with either the ongoing military presence and or the ransoms being paid.

 A single 20 mm Minigun or a 3" 50 would make instant mince meat of any  of those pirate boats.
Two centuries ago the US Navy and the USMC handled a piracy problem that was a lot greater - state sponsored and everything.  The problem, including the captives, should be handled by NATO - or the US Navy.  As carrier task force would minimize the attacks by going after the "mother ships" and I am sure that the US Navy Seals could rescue most of the hostages.  Remember, on the Horn, $600,000 even split 30 ways is more money than anyone can dream about so drastic measures are necessary to counter the attacks.
 Although I have no direct experience in this area, I would think that International Maritime Law certainly provides leeway for resistance to piracy on the high seas.

Modern Radar and a couple of appropriately ranged missiles could certainly keep the pirates at a distance that prevents their deployment of RPG's. When spotted..and one can assume that radar can identify probable suspects from the conformation of the signal at a significant distance, firing of one warning missile towards the potential attackers should be a sufficient deterrant. They should well be able to understand that when they are being targeted 10 - 12 miles out, it might be a little futile to approach closer to get in range.

In other words ....having ships fitted to defend themselves is probably not a problem..so why has it not come about?

First there would have to be a protocol governing the use of this weaponry any time it is deployed..and the shipping company would need to provide verifiable support data to justify this deployment to the board of international maritime law...If not already in place

The real problem with having armed merchant ships is the political and administrative issues for the owners when they arrive at neutral ports of call. Due to the current climate of terrorist activity, I think their may be significant resistance to having armed vessels cruising into port in countries all over the world..each with it's own policy governing the acceptance of having armed vessels in it's ports.
This one's easy. Since they're all greedy party animals looking for drugs and diing of hunger. Find a place to store and lock away the food. Instead have cases of rum, counterfeit cash,and tobacco to give them. Let them board as people who need help from poverty, and let them party and have a good time. While they're having a good time sneak some shark bait over the side and by the time the sharks arrive they'll be good and drunk and then throw them over with their weapons, let them fend for themselves.
geez, these people need to be taught a lesson. Its no joking matter, we should make contact with them *cough* obama *cough* and if they don't comply, take em out via undercover patrol boats, that seems fair enough.
Blackwater
Not sure why no one has mentioned this, but why not hire the pirates that are attacking the ships to defend the ships. Hire groups of them and pay them salaries. That would work, would it not?
I might only be 18, but I think this problem needs to be addressed in more than just one way. Yes, these pirates are indeed desperate people but they should not get away with doing things like this. Sitting and trying to talk it out won't work either as these people have been hopelessly abandoned by their own governments, so why should they trust any other form of authority. While I think these pirates need help to find better ways to a better life, aiding them is a long term issue, but the crimes they are committing present a short term issue that has to be dealt with head-on. The only problem is how? Arming the ships, crews and placing private security can be potentially very expensive. I'm not saying we should completely abandon these ideas, but we need to come up with alternatives. Implement defense mechanisms that can prevent any pirate access to the boat. I'm not sure what but I think if some smart minds thought enough they could come up with something like a panic room or lockdown mode. There are lots of security systems to prevent intruders that could potentially have an application on ships.
Hire 5 commandos for each ship at the cost of $250,000 or so (cheap insurance). Arm them with RPG's and other military fighting equipment. Wait for the pirates to board the ships and kill them all and blow up their ships!
There is no way NATO or any country is going to mount an attack against these thugs. Fight fire with fire!

Once they believe that the ships are armed the attacks will dwindle because they will not who is armed or not. Right now they know no one is armed and it is a free-for-all!
It is time to deal with these so called pirates with the same amount of violence as they exude.  Each ship navigating these waters should be armed with cannons both forward, aft, port and starboard.  Each ship should have a trained security staff armed with AK-47s, handguns and shotguns.  If this doesn't stop these violent attacks each company operating in these waters should run their vessels as convoys and have armed patrol boats accompany them.  Perhaps such patrol boats could be hired by a coalition of companies.  This might even create a whole new industry for men and women not of the faint at heart.
This one's easy. These pirates are definitely party animals with greed and hunger driving them. Invite them on as people in need from an impoverished nation. Just hide the food away in a secret storage where they can't find it and leave out cases of rum (think wild Indians and firewater), and counterfeit money, and tobacco. Let them take it all cuz that's all there is for them and who'll be the wiser? If they decide to party on the ship wait until they get good and drunk. While they party slip a lot of shark bait over the sides. By the time they're too drunk to stand (or swim) the sharks will have arrived (out of hunger) and then throw them all overboard along with there guns, let them fend for themselves.
The last I heard, most commercial ships are prohibited by the laws of the country that they enter from having weapons aboard. Showing up with fire arms will get the officers, possibly the lower ranking crew members, and the ships detained. Our diplomats have a job to do involving some new treaties.
Shipping lanes with a high risk for piracy should be monitored by GPS technology, and vessels equipped with remotely accessed surveillance and warning devices that will trigger rapid response teams from strategically located maritime 'police' vessels by sea or aerially.
Aww their starving, poor conditions, etc, that is no excuse for holding hostages, ships or goods,another form of terrorism, that must be stopped at any cost.The pirate leader poses for pictures, smiling and bragging about the $350.000 he alone got on his last job and he did not forward it to help his Country. If someone pulled this in the States or Canada, they would serve 20 years, if they were lucky, if they were not lucky, their actions would end with a sniper round. End this, blow them outta the water and hunt down the rest, before more innocents die or get left with lasting scars. How long will be before we are watching a couple hundred people being shot or tortured on a cruise ship?
Patrols are not going to stop the attacks. Only direct action is the only solution to stop piracy. Blockcade the Somali coast, search every vessel. Aerial observation using satelites, drones and manned aircraft to identify any vessels that linger in the area. Armed decoy ships to lure in the pirates and destroy or capture them. This is one of those situations where it does not pay to be nice. Piracy was pretty much wiped out in the 1800's by determined goverments, the reluctance to take action by international forces is why it is flourishing today.
Interesting George W. Bush can invade a sovern nation without justification but can't touch these criminals because of simple international rules.

Give me a break!
Never Fear!  obama is here!  

He'll fix everything... and won't have to do anything to do it!  

Yeah Obama!!
Wow... kill or capture the pirates.  What a great idea:  some of you are geniuses for having thought of it.

Meanwhile, no "we" don't know where "the" pirates are.  Some of you are reacting with your gut because you've finally heard for the first time about a problem that has been plaguing international commerce more or less continuously for the past 500 years.  Some of you seem to think that it was wiped out at some point in the past and has just come back in the past few weeks or months.  In reality, all that has changed lately is that pirates are getting bolder and there is a higher concentration of it in one region.

And some of you are clueless as to how big the oceans are.  Capturing or killing "the" pirates isn't NEARLY as easy a job as capturing or killing Osama bin Laden.

Alternately, it's possible that all the best maritime and military minds are just not quite as knowledgeable about this matter as the knee-jerk collective opinion of this Internet forum.
What I don't understand is why does everyone automatically think this is a problem just for the US military?  EVERYTIME the US tries to move to help some poor SOB we get slapped in the face by the World Community!  Remember the last time we went to help pooooor Somolia?  It the UN really cares, let them fix the issue.  And PLEASE, that "ooohh they're poor people" BS is a crock... we fought for our freedoms, maybe it's the Somali people's turn to fight for theirs.
we should outsource more of our jobs to somalia soon thet would all be rich and no piracy   this would show our love for the pirates tis better to give than receive all they want is a little understanding and we have too many jobs now as people are coming across our tightly sealed border to fill them i say export more jobs to friendly somalia
Bugs Bunny Comments are far more smarter then the rest of you. In order to have weapons on a ship you would have to know the countries laws that you are visiting(merchant sailors are subject to the country law that they are in which include thier teritorial waters). Let say that all of the counrties your ship was visiting there laws allowed firearms then who would decide who and what to shoot. There first time some inocent person got shot that sailor would be held responible. One of the charters of the U.S. Navy is to keep the sealanes open for commerce. How come the U.S. Navy has not done more? How many U.S. Flagged merchat ships been attacked. Most merchant ships have less the 25 personal onboard They are overworked depends on thier rotation but let say 6 month onboard that is 180 days without a day off approx 12 hour days. so when they are attcked there are 12 people awake. The attacks happen very fast. large ships are slow. Samalia is not the only place pirate attacks happen. So what is the solution? Why is this an american problem? It is a problem to the flaghe country of the ships and crew members being
attcked. How many U.S. Personell are beeing held for ransom? excuse the spelling and grammer
I saw a story on History Channel where a cruise ship was attacked off of Samalia and they excaped because one of the brave crew members climbed to the top of the ship and used an ultrasonic sounding device on the pirates. Its a new non lethal technology where you point this giant pointed cone at a target and the sound emmitted from the device is so painful to the human ear that its an uncontrolable impulse to cover your ears and move away. Not so easy to fire a rocket launcher with both hands covering your ears! Perhaps these should be manditory on the high seas!
Dear God! Does anyone actually believe that helping improve the economic situation or fostering better education over there is going to prevent criminal behavior? In our best economic times in the US we still had criminal behavior. It has ever been with us. Singing Kumba Ya as a response to an armed attack will get you killed. It is a shame there are so many people too timid to make any attempt to protect themselves. They would rather someone do it for them and take the risks. In life you choose to be a victim or to fight back. Terrorists and criminals do not think like the average Joe and laugh in the face of reason. Grow up.  
Any U.S. citizen who is enough of a dumb ass to be on a cruise ship in these waters gets what they deserve.  You want to go on a cruise, do it where you know the waters are friendly.  I can see it now, more U.S. taxdollars being spent on people who have more money than brains.  
Anybody ever heard Julius Caesar? When he was catured second time, about 2000 years ago , he promised the pirates that he will return and hang them on the trees. They laughed at him, but not for long . He returned and executed them. Think what you want, but it was a success. You can read it in the Vikipedia.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1695178

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.