ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Battling against a Beijing demolition

Posted: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:48 PM
Filed Under:

BEIJING – According to the lunar calendar, it's officially winter in China today. And although it was sunny, the wind picked up as the temperature dropped.

So spare a thought for 56-year-old Dong Jiqin, who could be evicted from his home in western Beijing and sleeping on the streets of the capital tonight.

Not because he's just another victim of the global economic recession. If anything, he's just the latest casualty of China's breakneck development.

Or so it would appear.

Adrienne Mong / NBC News
Dong Jiqin holds up a court document.

"The demolition project here began in October 2002," he told us and a handful of other foreign journalists shivering in the morning chill of his dilapidated courtyard home in Beijing’s Xicheng district. "Neither the government nor the developer has ever shown any certificate of legitimate right to tear down houses [here]."

Dong, who was grasping a folder of legal documents that included court summonses and court notices regarding the demolition of his home, said he had been given no information about the development plan.

"Nobody ever came to my house to discuss details. They are just trying to take my house illegally," he said calmly. "They bought off the garbage collector, too. He told me they are coming to demolish today."

Activist targeted
Dong was born in this courtyard house. It's where he played and grew up, where he lived when he got married, and where he raised his daughter.

It's also where his wife, Ni Yulan, was taken by plainclothes police – and, her husband believes, gangsters – on April 15 of this year. "They came to our house, tore down some of the house, cut off our phone and power lines, grabbed our belongings and dug up our sewage pipes," recalled Dong.

The authorities initially accused Ni of assaulting a demolition worker, part of a group tearing down homes surrounding Dong and Ni’s house in the Qianzheng hutong (the term for the series of narrow streets and alleys that characterize traditional Beijing neighborhoods).

Gu Bo / NBC News
Dong Jiqin's wife has been held by the authorities since April.

A couple of weeks later, Ni was charged with obstructing a public official, which according to China’s Criminal Law carries a maximum sentence of three years in prison.

Ni – a lawyer by training – was not just a pesky homeowner who refused to vacate her house. She had been an active voice campaigning on behalf of residents who had experienced similar situations – forced evictions and the destruction of their homes around Beijing during the city’s makeover ahead of the Summer Olympics.

She lost her lawyer’s license when she was arrested in 2002 and sentenced to a year in prison after filming the demolition of the house of someone who was forced out of their home. According to Human Rights Watch, she was beaten while being held by the police for 75 days.

It’s her activism for tenants’ rights that Dong believes is the reason his family is being persecuted and driven out of their home.

Ni was supposed to stand trial in August, just before the Olympics began, but it was postponed. No new date has been set, and no further information has been given, said her husband.

Spotlight on China
But Ni’s case may get some international attention soon. "It will be interesting to see how Ni’s case might be affected in light of the [United Nations] Committee Against Torture review of China," said Sophie Richardson, the Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch.

The U.N. Convention Against Torture – which comprises ten independent experts who monitor the implementation of the international convention – is starting a very public two-day review of China in Geneva on Friday. As a member of the U.N., the Chinese government has had no choice but to agree to the scrutiny and answer questions about alleged abuses against prisoners and dissidents.

While it’s hard to gauge what impact the review might have on officials in Beijing, "this has never happened before," said Richardson.

The Chinese government has prepared for another review scheduled early next year by the U.N. on broader human rights. Earlier this week, it announced what it called a "human rights action plan," the first of its kind in the country, designed to protect citizens’ rights over the next two years.

Seeking answers…and justice 
But none of this has come soon enough for Dong, who last saw his wife 215 days ago.

"I have not seen her at all since she was taken," he said although his lawyer has been allowed to visit her three times. "She was in a single room for a long time. She has a chronic headache, but they don’t give her any treatment or medicine."

Dong, a former education administrator who has since stopped working, said he has filed appeals with the local district court to stop the demolition. His wife has written letters alleging police brutality while she’s in custody. And Dong says that their 24-year-old daughter, who had been living at home, has been so spooked by some of the apparent intimidation tactics that she has run away.

Dong said they don’t have any real options – apart from talking to the media in the hope someone can help him.

Of the thirteen people in his family who used to live in the traditional courtyard house, he is the last one holding out in this Qianzheng hutong.

"I have nowhere to go if I am evicted," he said quietly. "I’ll have to become a homeless person. We have no prospect if corruption is not investigated."

When I called him this evening to check on his status, he said no one had yet come for him. But he wasn’t hopeful.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

With the current economic recession in the United States and abroad it is not likely that the U.N. will delve too deep into China's affairs. If they do it may only be a few isolated cases of jailing or public repression.What kind of oversight will they bring to bear? Will the thousands of repressed citizens of China ever see justice or freedom to live? I will keep my hope for them.
I am so sorry for the oppressed Chinese people. I am so incredibly grateful to be a free American.
Kudos to correspondent Adrienne Mong for bringing to attention these kind of injustices that Chinese citizens are suffering.  Corrupted government officials are the major obstacle to democratic reforms in China. Dong Jiqin is looking at us for help so we must all get involved and voice our opinions.
forget the olympics.  this is the real china.
this is a good exampale, why the second amendment must not be comprimised, by the corrupt politions in this county
hmmm... I'm starting to notice a pattern in these type of articles.  It's always one sided, no effort was even made to get the story from the other side.  sometimes it reads more like thinly viled propaganda than journalism.  Then again, i guess when you are preaching to the chior, you don't need to be objective.
The people of China are up against terrorists that run the country.  There is no freedom in China. The ruling party even terrorizes Buddhist monks, the people of Tibet.  All this while the world watches and does nothing.  Of course the reason is money.  Americans want cheap items and they do not care where, how or who makes it as long as they get the cheapest price for their tvs and other electonics.  The 2008 Olympics showed the world just how cruel China really is.  They are no better than the North Koreans, Iran and the butchers in African countries.
If anyone thinks the US or other western countries will do anything about this, you head is in the sand.
Money talks!!
Peter R. Stricker
What a disgrace the government greed has brought upon itself!
Keep up the pressure for a decent replacement home for Dong. The hutong is a loss, but there are hundreds of thousands of apartments being built all over China and he deserves one at the very least. He deserves support from the UN.
The reporter should do a story on how the government & prosecutors are abusing their prosecutorial powers and using RICCO laws to dispossess Americans of their housing and assets. A similiar story of corruption, is it not?
How else would China build so rapidly and completely change the face of all of their cities.  This just hasn't been published....there must be millions of people with the same story.
It is so stupid and a shame the olympics came and gone and this is getting worse for china, all the developments they do without thinking about the people and enviroment and they still treat their own and their neighbours like . It is an insult by the greeks who did not stop or threaten to stop the olympics. This is the truth behind the olympic city
Another example of biased and slanted reporting of events in China.  Dong does not own his home...no private individual owns land in China.  At best an individual can purchase a 70 year lease on property.  The government is probably only exercising its legal right as the owber of the land in demolishing Dong's home.  Get your facts straight!  As to the other issue relatibg to the incarceration his wife, I can't comment except that dissidents anywhere in the world (including the USA) are often denied basic civil rights.
Didn't we do something like this here? They went all the way to the Supreme court and lost? I think they built a shopping mall for the "puplic good" rather than let a run down neighborhood (people's homes) stay as the property was near a river. This report does not suprise me in a land that is still 100% communistic. I feel bad for those people, but, it's their country, not mine.
This is indeed one-sided reporting. The vast majority of these people never owned these homes nor paid a dime for them, the accommodation was provided by the state owned enterprise they worked for.  As these people are moved out of these areas they are offered a deeply discounted price on an apartment in a new building and a very good rate on a mortgage for whatever amount they cannot pay for.  The new apartments have all the modern amenities while the homes in the hutongs are usually a single room not much bigger than a typical western bedroom and there is one water spigot for everyone and communal toilet facilities down the road that are just holes in the floor.  The mens' side has an added trough for urination.

When almost every area is demolished there are a few holdouts that try to hold up the demolition in an attempt to extort some money out of the developer who doesn't want to face costly delays.  These people have learned to use the western press as a tool to further their efforts at extortion.  

Often these same people will decry the destruction of the traditional hutongs but while the hutongs are traditional the accommodation these people live has only existed since 1949 when thousands of people from the countryside were moved into the cities and extra rooms were built into the traditional homes, really just shanty towns.  Most of these buildings were never maintained and are completely beyond restoration.  The few that were restorable have been and are beautiful relics of a time past and are protected by government regulation from destruction or alteration.

Yes, the old hutongs had much more sense of neighborhood and density was so high that your neighbors were more like family but they were also terribly unsanitary.  There is good reason that one of the most common flu bugs is referred to as "Beijing Flu."

This is not to say there is no corruption nor other problems.  China has many problems to solve but over the 15 years I have been involved with China, most of them living there, I have seen the living standard of everyone, even those in the countryside, improve dramatically.  Sadly, I have also seen the quality of journalism decline to a similar degree.
First of all, let me say that I feel extremely sorry for the man losing his wife. However, after seeing many cases of one-sided arguments, I personally want to know the other side of the story. There is no doubt that the treatment the guy got is vile, but is that the end of the story? Or was there something more to it that the guy didn't mention? For those of you wondering, no, I am not a communist. I am just broader minded than some.
How about we stop feeling sorry for these poor people, and after examining the labels, STOP, STOP, buying anything made in China.

This is the only way that we-the-people- have any "say" in what the heck is going on.

When our say is gone, they will not let us speak.
It is sad that China allows these injustices perhaps in its great leap forward it has forgot the ordinary people who are the mainstream of all nations. It seems justice is a very distant cousin of the law in Bejing.
The majority of the people are still oppressed by the government and corrupt officials with no rights or freedom of speech. The only people who say they are not oppressed are rich city folks who are just as corrupted, their voices are easily heard by outsiders which covers the truth about china.
Having been to China and staying in Beijing many times in the last year I have seen the demolition of many of the hutongs and the developement of modern housing and shoping areas, I have not noticed the homeless people. I live near Seattle and see many homeless persons on a regular basis. The standard of living is increasing in Beijing for all of the people that I witness. The small street food vendors that had wooden carts to to prepare their foods on one year ago have been provided with modern aluminum food preperation stands to do the same tasks. China is only doing what every city in the United States completed many years ago and removed the small downtown neighborhood and replaced them with more conventional downtown buildings including apartments. I think that James has it right.
Interesting article but still just an article. We need more information and a method to verify any and all information we can see or hear.

I look at the lies and exaggerations spewed forth by George W. Bush during his illegal lying to Congress while listing phony stories up to secure signatures from Congressmen to invade Iraq, and other such lies such as all those rejected by United States Citizens, as told by McCain during his failed and disgusting effort running for the office of President.

What ever happened to our pride in country and true honesty?
We should stand up for human rights no matter where or with what country.

One thing GWB and Bill Clinton both did - Clinton in Bosnia and Kosovo, Bush in Afghanistan and Iraq.

With China, Darfur etc. Obama has his work cut out for him. I hope he is OK for the sake of all of us and the people who are in danger in those places.
I am an American currently in China. Believe it or not, stories like this are broadcast on the English speaking television stations here in China. Most Chinese are well aware of the corruption and they support the "Party" out of necessity only. A change is coming but it is a long ways off.
Anyone heard if "Manifest Destiny" and "Eminent Domain" in the U.S.? Research before making unwarranted assumptions.

A Native American teaching and living in China.
"Will the thousands of repressed citizens of China ever see justice or freedom to live?"

Free. Free of anxiety? Free of a web of debt, paying "interest" just to live. Every system has its own yokes to harvest the energy of its continuance. Here it is interest, there it is power. And this story could easily, with a few minor modifications, be transferred to America. We hear the stories often, "They're pushing us out!?". We don't pay attention.
James, I might point out that attempts to inquire about this sort of issue usually have one of four possible results:

A) The government official tows the party line and states that the person being held does not exist and that there are no problems in the workers paradise.  The prisoner is then killed.  
B) The government official states that they do exist, promises to look into this matter, and then does nothing.  The prisoner may enjoy an increase in beatings from guards.
C) The government official admits the person does exist and tries to shift blame to his subordinates.  The prisoner may remain in prison or is killed.
D) The government official tows the state line and then investigates the issue and attempts to do something about it.  If they're lucky, they will only be demoted/fired/forced to flee.  If they're unlucky, they're killed, and the prisoner 'disappears'.  

Welcome to the gulags, tovarishch.  
My lord!  If China does not wake up and "smell the coffee", it will have an uprising at some point in time.  My heartfelt sorrow to those like Dong Jiqin who will be displaced without any alternative housing provided by the government.  If China thinks it is the equivalent of the Roman Empire - well we all know that it crumbled in the end.
James, Pittsburgh, PA- A response to your statement.

Although in America we are quite familiar with biased media and thus prone to look for the other side of the story, this is a totally different setting my friend.

I'm Canadian and have been living in China (Beijing) for nearly 5 years. I am very familiar with this type of situation.  I know many locals who live in such traditional Beijing Neighborhoods and were evicted from their homes, my friend actually owns a house in such a state.  Although they do not live there anymore (only one uncle does), they do still own the house.  The government is forcing them to sell it for not even a fraction of what the property is actually worth. This is China.  The government owns the country, and consequently owns YOU (Chinese citizens)

The reason why they don't get the other side of the story is that there is no other side.  To a totalitarian government, there is only one side, theirs. If you do not conform to this, they either intimidate you or imprison you. Nothing here is by the book, and the regulations are not an obligation.  They depend and apply only to whom you are connected to.  If you are lucky , you know a government official and he will help you get a better price on your house, that's it.

After the all traditional housing is out of the way, they make new apartment buildings.  The folks that used to live in those houses are given a small amount (% of the house value) and are sent out.  They cannot live in the new apartment buildings unless they can pay the insane price attached to them.(They would of been able to if they would have been appropriately compensated for their property loss).  Look at how much a Square Feet is worth now in Beijing.  The traditional houses are in the center of the city's inner 2nd ringroad (highway) which is the most expensive area of the entire region.  New apartment buildings in these areas sell houses for about 12 000 Yuan per SQUARE FEET.  Thats about 2000$ USD for a Square feet.  Most apartments are about 100 to 200 in such a building. Can you afford that?  Most people here can't.  Specially not people such as this man in the news article who's whole family lived in one property and that IT was their main fortune.

No there are not millions in Beijing in this bad situation since these kinds of traditional housing projects are very rare now. However in the country side there are millions of farmers having their lands taken out from under them and transformed into industrial compounds, manufactures and apartment complexes.  These people have no other work, they have no education and not enough saving to cover the expense of a whole family living in new project housing with no work.  Not enough money to send their kids to new school and assure a place to stay.  No, school isn't government funded like in canada and other civilized countries.

Trust me, the injustices go on and on. One day the world will take notice of China, hopefully and will give it's people the human rights that they deserve.  

I'm sorry I don't say my name, but I wouldn't dare to do that while still living here.
We live in a world of national sovereignty.  People have only those rights which their governments give them.  There are very very few fundamental human rights to which all people are entitled, and this story does not regard any of them.  The idea that everyone, everwhere, is entitled to a degree of justice that amounts to "fairness" is simply wrong.  China does not have the same kind of justice or priorities as America.  Get over it, you California hippies.
What the western media forget to mention is how much MONEY ($$$) the Beijing govt is paying to this lady to 'evict' her from her home.  It will be in at least the 6 figures US$.  Xicheng.  My grandmother was one of the happily 'evicted' residents of these 'flat houses' as they call it.  The Beijing govt wrote a check for 780,000 RMB (That's $125,000 USD) for her 1000 sq share.  And my grandmother was in the outskirts of Beijing.  This woman's home is near the city center, and she will be compensated at least over $200,000, money she can use to buy a place elsewhere in the city.  


She should not be complaining.
James fr PA has nailed a valid point. As a sponsored American academic living near Beijing since 2004, i've been truly amazed at the WESTERN propaganda machine which fills reams with such incitements, while propounding 'truth' from its inevitably ethnocentric pov.  While Mr. Dong's plight may be an example of the multiple 'waves of mutilation' continuing to wash over China, there is a very telling quote hidden before our eyes: "Of the...people...who used to live in the traditional courtyard house, he is the last one holding out in this...hutong."  There is no mention of the repeated government attempts to provide compensation commensurate with the 'inflicted suffering' - and if You were to walk through many of the hutong areas, you might wonder that anyone could find comfort in such conditions. This is the push factor moving government services to use new-found prosperity to relocate such persons in an ongoing effort to revitalize cities like Beijing. We have only the words of a stubborn old man and a disenfranchised lawyer fighting perceived injustice for our sources here. Where is the 'democratic' notion of displaying another pov, or providing even a representational dialogue? My heart goes out to Dong and Ni, but please be cautious when passing snap judgments on a whole nation in the throes of change, the likes of which the West can scarce imagine. Where was your voice when the USSC destroyed private property rights? Or while the Bush League rendered so many other 'sacred' rights obsolete? An ancient proverb; before you admonish your neighbor's infidelities, make sure you know where Your wife is!
Have any one of you posting your silly comments here actually been to China? Just as I thought, so shut up. Me? Oh, I live in China and it isn't what the US media always spin it out to be.
The reporter has no ideal the true story, Beijing has been move residents for development since 1992, there is no way Mr.Dong don't know he has to move.

I spent a week in Beijing visiting my son this past spring, and yes, this is going on. The government is tearing down these small, sprawled developments for space and because the multi-story apartments look better to visitors. It displaces a lot of people, but at the same time, employs a lot more.

Yes, it is bs, but what do you expect from a communist government?
So sad - what is extremely more sad is that this may soon be happening in the United States with our change from being a republic to a socialist country.
I was in Tianamen Square, Beijing, China when students had their confrontation with the Police.  There are very tight controls over all activities in China.  The "Rules of the Day" are very harsh and the people take the brunt.  I do not know how much longer the Chinese People can put up with a system that keeps them under the thuimb of a supposed leader at every turn of their life.  Chinese citizens need to be free. They are good people.  
Obama, the new president elect will learn from China and SHARE THE WEALTH.  Don’t be so concern with things that Berry Obama can’t correct the US will soon have many more problems then she herself can handle.  
What un-socialist conduct from a purportedly socialist country. The government there practices all of the most dark and sinister aspects of robber baron capitalism.  The government can no longer call itself socialist. the Communist Party of China no longer serves the interest of the people or workers.  It  should change its name to the National Socialist Party of China! Shame on them!!!
Free American? We do the same thing here, but we use the fancy big words term of "Eminent Domain". As usual, a bunch of comments from alot of woodchucks who never been to China and only believe what they have seen or read from the media.
I think we should be concerned about the homeless Americans first. I currently live in Shanghai and don't remember the last time I saw what I would consider a homeless person. However, when I lived in the Minneapolis/St.Paul area I frequently saw numerous homeless people. Many lived under interstate bridges and in caves along the river. Also, I lived in Hawai'i on the island of Oahu. At times, I felt as if there were more homeless people than tourists. I do feel bad for Mr. Jiqin and his wife, but know that there are people in the US that I should also be concerned about.
It is obvious that Adrienne Mong did try to get the story from the other side, but no one would admit that they were responsible, including the government. It is a brave person who questions the corpulant, gassy leaders of the communist party. Great job Adrienne Mong. It's too bad that Chinese communist party running dogs insist on voicing their opinions in these forums.
The jailing of people without notification or answering to any family members is a true occurence in China. Their legal system is rifted with many inconsistencies and archiac political-backed influences-it not whether a person committed any crimes, it's more if the person is a hinderence to the country's proud "economic" push to become a powerhouse on the world stage!  
So, China violates human rights as they try to develop their country and improve their standard of living, which they do by making and selling material goods to us.  Then, we get upset when they do bad things to their people and their environment in an effort to meet our material demands.  Maybe our hunger to maintain our standard of living, a standard which the Chinese are also seeking, encourages or even requires the behavior that we depise.  We are not blameless in their current behavior or in our own history.  That said, I hope Mr. Jiqin and his wife and daughter are soon reunited and safe.
Preaching to the choir? If we are the choir we are not singing loudly enough! More articles like this are desparately needed; not just covering China but other areas of the "developing" world like Venezuala, Egypt, and Mexico. And we also need to look over our own shoulders where we DO need development so that our people can live in safety and comfort. Areas still damaged by Katrina perhaps?
There are many other stories which is favour of government reconstruction plans.  The majority of Chinese people are for the plan and not against it.  This article is nothing but one-sided and bias.  Most of these people who are against the plan are greedy and asking for more money that is already a lot more than they needed...Please people here in US, don't jump into conclusion that Chinese government is evil.  I feel sorry for you in Amercia, only hear one-sided story and you are being fooled by your media.
Remember T SQUARE, when China rolled out tanks and sent soldiers to stop their citizens from demonstrating...and what about the continent of Africa with all the policies of death and destruction inflicted on so many by just a few. This man and his family are the casualties of the tyrannical policies of the few. How else can the few effectively control the may.    
MAN'S IN HUMANITY TO MAN knows no bounds.
Didn't I read a report last year about improper use of eminent domain on the east coast of, hm, I believe it was the U.S.A. I guess corruption is not isolated to the Chinese government.

I also wonder why Dong is the only one in his neighborhood that is left. Have the others found alternate housing? Are the others that passive, or have they been treated fairly? Does the government normally provide housing in a different location? New housing once the area is developed? Obviously a city that is developing so fast is going to have to use eminent domain, it's just a question of whether or not they are fair in the process. This blog leaves many questions unanswered.

Most disturbing, however, is that a citizen can be held for 200+ days without some kind of legitimate court action. This brings out the need for a just legal system, as well as a free press.
I read a poem many years ago by Martin Niemöller it goes like this,  "In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist; And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist; And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew; And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."
If the Chinese want to live like the west they have to speak up.  I don’t mean one or two lonely voices now and again.  Not a few thousand activists marching in a square.  It takes millions knocking down palace walls and government buildings.  It will take idealistic men who will seize power from the unjust and being men of such unshakeable virtue they willingly give it back to the people and not become the next Dictator in a line of Dictators.  
Hmmm, James from Pittsburgh.  I've been traveling to China about 7-8 times per year since 1995.  Firt, the stories are one-sided because no Gvt official is going to comment on something "that is a totally untrue fabrication".  Second, I've met many of these people, been in their homes (hovels?), and stayed in the Marriott constructed on the same piece ofd ground a couple of years later.  It may appear there is some reporter "dramatizing" of these situations, btu from my detailed experience, let me say "it ain't much".
Hmmm, James from Pittsburgh.  I've been traveling to China about 7-8 times per year since 1995.  Firt, the stories are one-sided because no Gvt official is going to comment on something "that is a totally untrue fabrication".  Second, I've met many of these people, been in their homes (hovels?), and stayed in the Marriott constructed on the same piece of ground a couple of years later.  It may appear there is some reporter "dramatizing" of these situations, buu from my detailed experience, let me say "it ain't much".


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1663168

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.