ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Pakistanis have little faith in Obama 'change'

Posted: Thursday, November 06, 2008 5:12 AM
Filed Under: ,



By NBC News' Fakhar Rehman

ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN -- "As a Pakistani, I am not hopeful (Barack Obama’s) election will bring any positive change for Pakistan," said Zohra Aslam, 26, a lecturer of political science at Government College in Kohat, near the Afghan border.

Here in Pakistan, people all over the country followed the U.S. presidential campaigns with anticipation and in many cases skepticism. On election day, television channels stayed on air all night with special programming and analyses.

Image: Selling newspapers in Islamabad
AP
A Pakistani man sells evening newspapers with the headline story of Sen. Barack Obama's victory in the U.S. presidential election on a road in Islamabad, Pakistan, on Wednesday. 

"Obama or McCain, either way it's a lose-lose situation for Pakistan regarding U.S. policies towards our country," said Yasmeen Khan, a housewife and mother of three, in Quetta, capital of the southwestern province of Balouchistan.

Khan said she closely followed the campaigns for months and felt she got to know both candidates and their policies towards Pakistan. "I really admire the American election process," she said, trying to add a more positive note to her analysis. "We don't have free and fair election campaigns here- we need to learn that from the Americans."

Akram Zaki, 75, a former diplomat, was not shy about giving his opinion on the new president-elect. "Obama will be as bad for Pakistan as Bush," he said. "As long as our own government has no coherent policy on this war on terror, then the new U.S. government will continue with the ways of the past administration and dictate policy to us," he said.

"It's time for Pakistan to wake up and shape up and demand the U.S. respect the resolutions of our own democratic Parliament and stop these drone attacks inside our borders."

‘Constant U.S. drone attacks’
A majority of Pakistanis still view the war on terror as America's war and the missile attacks by unmanned U.S. predator drones on al-Qaida and Taliban targets inside the tribal areas along the Pakistan-Afghan border as a violation of their sovereignty.

"Despite billions of dollars that the Bush administration has poured into Pakistan, the U.S. government has not been successful in changing the perceptions of the Pakistanis towards the U.S," said Imran Javaid, a property developer in Islamabad. "The constant U.S. drone attacks on us have made a considerable dent in our once good bi-lateral relations."

Aamir Sheikh, 40, a businessman in the city of Rawalpindi , a 20 minute drive from the capital Islamabad, gave a long sigh of relief. "I am so happy that Bush has lost," he said. "I know Obama will bring peace to Pakistan and resolve all our issues thru talks," he said.

Khursheed Akhtar agreed. Akhtar, 36, owns an electrical appliance shop in Islamabad and his business, just like the rest of the Pakistani economy, is bad.

"The only reason Obama won was the American people themselves were sick and tired of the Bush administrations policies which ruined their economy," he said.

"Now it is up to Obama to improve the political and financial situation in Pakistan and in the whole world."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

President-elect Barak Obama has raised very high expectation all over trhe globe, especially Muslims. Muslims may try to find solace that future relationship between the US and the Muslim world might improve perceptibly. But so long as the US ME policy (which immensely influences the US attitude towards Muslims) does not change, there's very little hope.
I ONLY READ THE FIRST LINE OF YOUR NEWSLETTER AND DO BELIEVE SINCERELY, THAT YOU HAVE PRE-JUDGED THE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STTES.  PLEASE GIVE HIM THE OPPORTUNITY OF GRACE, PATIENCE AND RESPECT THAT HE IS a RIGHTEOUS MAN TO BE RESPECTED.  I AM SURE THAT WITH PRAYER AND CONFIDENCE, IN THE FUTURE,  YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DELIVER A MESSAGE OF SUPPORT AND CONFIDENCE IN THIS MAN.  PLEASE FOCUES ON A MORE POSITIVE ATTITUDE AND I AS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN OF THIS UNITED STATES PROMISE SUCCESS AND PROSPERITY DELIVERED TO NOT ONLY YOUR COUNTRY BUT TO ALL OF THE WORLD. NOT TODAY OR TOMORROW, DO CONSIDER THE MESS THAT HE IS COMING INTO.  IN ESSENCE, DON'T BE SO QUICK TO JUDGE.  BE BLESSED.
The American campaign in Afghanistan will be decided in North-West Frontier Province which is a safe-haven for the terrorists. Pakistan's problem is that the terrorist infrastructure it established for use against India is now indistinguishable from what is used against NATO in Afghanistan. This includes the arms factories in villages, funding sources, safe houses, madrasas and the terrorists themselves. Dismantling this infrastructure means that the Pakistani military will have to take apart it's most potent weapon against India. Their unwillingness to do so leaves the Americans with no choice but to attempt it themselves but this is an impossible task without active and unrestrained help from the Pakistani military .

The Pakistani government will be seen as even more of an American stooge if it helps but faces the threat of the terrorists moving into the cities of Sindh and Punjab provinces if it doesn't stop them in NWFP.

Meanwhile, the Pakistani military is content to sit back and let this fall on Zardari's shoulders which in turn sets the stage for further turmoil and instability in the future. All three parties in this war want something different. The Americans want OBL, Mullah Omar and an end to the terrorist haven in Pakistan. The Pakistani military wants to avoid complete destruction of their primary weapon against India while the civilian government in Pakistan simply wants enough money to avoid bankruptcy and without strings. God help President-elect Obama!
Not that Bush would have had a snowball's chance in Iraq of winning another election, but did the person interviewing Aamir Sheikh make him aware that Bush was not able to run for another term?  That he could only have two terms in office?  That he didn't lose... he merely was inelligible to continue his presidency?  Or did was he insinuating that a McCain victory would have been the same as a third Bush term?  Does he realize that his country is going to have to fight against terrorists in order for us to stop fighting for them?
I think Pakistan may like to consider attempting to, or at least learning to, help itself rather than relying on outside assistance. Of course for that we would need an educated or at least engaged population to not suffer the whims of incompentant goverance. There is a sense that some politicans like the leverage that comes with armed, unstable, dangerous and incapable, rather than a place ripe for investment. Perhaps if Pakistan and our people formed a coherant, positive image of themselves we would all be more inclined to see this a 'war on terror' as a war on our very liberties and rights on our very own own land and therefore insist our government engages with the fight for something other than yet another monetary handout. Just as Bush ruled with the psychology of fear and people stopped questioning his policies incase they were seen as unpatriotic, so Pakistani seems to kowtow to an ever dictatorial religious rule which then complicates the legitimate critique of all that is being alledgedly done in the name of Islam.
Obama is no dummy and I believe he tries to keep an open mind. Based on several reports of Pakistani militias getting attacked, it seems to me that they are trying to resolve the militancy in the tribal areas using traditional approaches observed in those areas. To me, this is a good sign. I don't believe that the Pakistanis want terrorists running about any more than we do.

Increased economic aide as well as military aide probably should be on the drawing board. The former because it is the right thing to do and the latter because it is needed.
if the Pakistani people get angry when we use drones to attack suspected alQaida and Taliban along the border, then maybe they should do more to help kill these terrorists themselves.  
I think the single most important question to be asked is for Mr Obama.  He should ask on a very public stage for the residents/tribesmen to immediately hand over all known terrorists.  Our country has done everything in its power, but never simply asked.
I agree with the people of Pakistan even though Obama has won the election, they can not depend on him to protect them. Now that Obama is elected, he was against the Iraqi war from day one and and wants to throw the Iraqi's under the bus after he gets our troops out. Pakistan can expect the same results by getting throwed under the bus as well. Pakistan will have to fight the Taliban alone. Obama said that it is a "Dog eat Dog" world and everybody has to defend for themselves.
Wow, the last line of this article is very telling.  Not only is this nation looking to Obama to help solve it's problems, but so is the rest of the world.  This is one man, who will be surrounded by a solid team with a tremendous amount of support.  I truly hope that people here and around the world will remain full of hope, but also look at situations realistically.  One of the greatest things our new president can do is lead by example and show other leaders how important it is to empower their people to make positive changes within their own countries and cultures.  This is a strong country, but we can't and shouldn't be responsible for the whole world.  We do our part and help others if they truly can't help themselves. The situation in Packistan is not ideal to say the least, but it's unrealistic to heap the political and economic issues of that nation entirely onto Obama or the U.S. Why doesn't Packistan take the initiative to legitimately seek out and prosecute al- Quaida for themeselves?  al-Qaida and terrorism are not good for any econonomy, so it's in the interest of sovreign nation of Packistan to eliminate both within it's borders and educate it's people with or without assistance from foreign powers.  As a citizen of the U.S. I would highly prefer that my country have a positive and balanced relationship with Pakistan with no need for our military involvement.  Unfortunately this can't happen if terrorists are allowed to freely operate, and coordinate attacks elsewhere in the world, within Pakistani borders.  
Hahahahaha, yes Stephen.  We'll just ask the terrorists to hand themselves in.  They'll definitely oblige, since Mr. Obama is just such a nice guy.  Get real.  Just reasoning and talking with terrorists (I do beleive some negotiation has it's place) and nations that harbor terrorists is not going to work.  They want to KILL Americans and will stop at nothing to do it.  Welcome to reality.
"We don't have free and fair election campaigns here- we need to learn that from the Americans." ....... damn our media is good at deceiving people!  We haven't had a free and fair election in years.  The last time an outsider tried to make it to the white house in 1992 when Ross Perot ran, garnering nearly 25% of the vote, the two parties decided it would be much better to create a presidential debate commission and exclude third party candidates.  
You said: "Pakistan will have to fight the Taliban alone."  Wake-up.  Pakistan is the strongest supporter of the Taliban.  They are friends.  I invite you to do some research.  
For me, the fact that Obama read Steve Coll's "Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan and Bin Laden" while he was on the campaign trail is an encouraging sign. Anybody familiar with Coll's work knows that his books are more objective and thoroughly researched than almost any other material out there. If Obama is informing himself about the issues in a truly educated fashion, then I don't believe his approach to Pakistan will be the same as the Bush Administration's approach. That is not to say he won't be tough. I think he will take a strong stance and expect Pakistanis to take more responsibility for the conditions near the border and the influx (and growing number) of people who support the Taliban. The key difference will be that Obama is studying the history behind these conditions, so his response is more likely to be in context with the realities of the situation on the ground near the border. This battle cannot be fought by the US or Paksitan alone. The spread of religious fundamentalism is like an infestation of cockroaches. You can't kill them one by one and expect to fix the problem. You have to get to the source and nix it. That means a lot of things. It means that more people will die. It also means that there has to be more education, a conscious effort to change the Pakistani public's opinions (somebody has to put a muzzle on the mouths of clergy), reaching out to young vulnerable teens and showing them that there's another way that's a better way than fundamentalism. Fundamentalism doesn't acheive prosperity, but it does give identity. Teenage boys on the outskirts must have a way to re-shape their identity, and that won't happen if they have nothing to live for, nothing to aspire to, and nothing to lose. America will breed more anti-American sentiment if it bombs first and asks questions later. At the same time, Pakistan cannot blame America for all of its internal problems. BOTH sides have to step up to the plate.  
Thanks, from Lahore, for your message and sense of understanding.  It's interesting to me that all of the interviews were taken in Islamabad, which offers a different prospective even WITHIN Pakistan! This is like doing interviews in....Arkansas, and making it out to be what 'Americans' think.  Please, readers, take into consideration HOW MANY people were talked to and the areas....and remember how journalism is done in the States before you make assumptions about a whole country.....it's how our country gets pressumed about also.  I've lived in both countries and both countries have a lot of violence, a lot of political problems, and a lot of really great people who simply want to get up, go to work, and take care of their families.  There's more to Pakistan than terrorists and there's more to America than bombing terrorists.
I am not saying Bush was correct in all his moves but we need someone strong to lead us and take care of our U.S. of A. Not a sweet talker that talked his way into the White House. He can not do all the things he said and that alone will come about to be our worst problem while our enemies will try to over come us and do not think for one moment they (enemy) will not take advantage of his weaknesses. I just wish the world was ready for this. GOD BE WITH US ALL!
Pakistanis, wake up!  The 'change' Obama's talking about is your change.  Can you?  Will you?  
If I understand this correctly the Pakistanis don't like the cross border missile strikes, but it is Obama's responsibility to "improve the political and financial situation in Pakistan and in the whole world".  Here is an idea, Pakistan: Modernize your own economy and fight your own terrorists.  Religious extremism rarely appeals to people who aren't dirt poor.  Be the change you seek and stop asking the rest of us to do it for you.
I am an American citizen, currently residing in
Germany.  Forty-five years ago, I was stationed in
Peshawar, Pakistan for 15 months, with the United
States Air Force.  During this period of time, I
spent many days riding the base shuttle, into town
and back, and on occasion, exploring the wilds of
this primitive city and talking to its inhabitants.
Since 9/11, the city of Peshwar has again become
newsworthy: It's the home of the terrorists (Bin
Laden and his worthless band).  In addition, while
viewing the current T.V. coverage, I noticed that
Peshawar has not grown in accordance with progression,
but rather, has remained stagnant. Nothing noticeable
had changed in my 45 years absence.  I surmise that
nothing noticeable had changed in the 45 years before
my arrival.  The residents of Peshawar, are still
carrying on as they have in the past, adhering to
to their antiquated traditions, with no visual signs
of positive change.  When negative change in a
country is observed, it normally is the result of
a poor schooling system.  It is a shame that
Pakistan is still a third-world country, but they
can brag, along with the Indians, that they are now
in possession of a nuclear bomb.  How does this
ownership, benefit the common people?  In regards
to Pakistan's relation on the World Stage, and as I
have mentioned earlier in this e-mail, the Pakistani
Government, has not surmounted a formidable effort
to ferret-out the likes of Bin-Laden.  In the
United State's effort to contain radical groups,
and acting upon substantial covert information,
they will continue their efforts to annihilate these
fundamentalists, regardless of the collateral
damage incurred by Pakistani citizens.  In an all-
out effort to rid the world of the Bin Laden's,
the Pakistani Government must "Step-up-to-the-
Plate," and "Do-the-Right-Thing," by informing
their people that the populace know where these
radical groups are hiding, and that if that if
they do not want to further incur the wrath of
offensive military operations, then they are to
inform the authorities of their whereabouts. This
type of psychology is the ONLY method to bring
peace to Pakistan, and other Third-World countries
such as Afghanistan, for example.  Armies and
weaponry are not the solution. In this case,
vigilant citizens.  It's the only way.  Iraq needs
to also adopt this type of psychology.  The
populace are the "KEY."

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Dennis P. Habern











 
Interestingly enough, I have little faith in the Pakistani people or government to contain the extremism that's rampant in their country.  Control your country, and you wouldn't see anyone else taking pot shots from aircraft carriers.  It's quite simple.  Additionally, this election means a change for our country.  If you want to do something for yours, so be it.  But, don't depend on the US when we can't even depend on you.


BM
No more free lunches for Pakistan! That's what will change for Pakistan with Obama taking over. So far, Pakistan has been gifted too much American tax payer money without any accountability or responsibility. Obama will make sure that Pakistan doesn't get $1  from America unless it can demonstrate that it is sincerely fighting against the radical forces in that country. The days of the two-faced policy of the Pakistani Govt & Military of helping the radical forces, which it claims to be fighting, are over. Obama is not a dim-witted dummy like Bush & he'll make sure of this.  
First of Bush was not in the election, a seemingly common misconception even in the U.S.  Second, until Pakistan has the will to hunt terrorist in it's own territory then let the drones fly.  Third it is not the responsibility of the U.S. to support the Pakistan economy.  As a taxpayer in fact I resent it... take care of your own house and by the way I am tried of hearing about honor killings... honor indeed, what a joke.  Fourth, the world continues to look to the U.S. as some sort of policeman, everyone wants us there when things are going wrong but then get upset when we throw the smackdown. Until it is unacceptable to be a terrorist Pakistan and similar countries will continue to have problems, no amount of money, no amount of goodwill, no amount of food will ever change that.  The U.S. has ALWAYS tried to help where needed, our sons have bleed for many countries to be free with very little appreciation.  Fine, next time ask China for help.
If Pakistani's want change in their country let them do it themselves.  They are preceived as they are because of what they are!  So look within first. You want to be modern? Do you want to be ancient? You can't be both.  With modernizatin,both economically and spiritually, comes change and it seems that most Islamics don't seek change.
Ah, being American ?? How many of these remarks simply
(at the core of problem solving) expect the Pakastani's to act like Americans in a lawful society and solve their problems along lines that all will accept, even in disagreement ?
The culture of Pakistan is thousands of years old, along with a thosand year-old religion. And they fear technology and western thoughts/traditions because they simply do not understand or want to for that fact. Lets at least, ackowledge that Pakistan has an
educated and elte upper-class which developed the NUCLEAR BOMB to use against India, as Pakistan is primarily Muslim and India is primarily Hindu.
This one fact alone (NUCLEAR BOMBS) adds a dimension
of "negotiation" which is stratigically dire in its
implimentation and carry-thru.
The near ultimate resistance of one religion (Hindu) to accept and respect (Islam) and vice-versa, will require supreme patience and negotiation.
Only then, after Pakistan and India reach moderation
and mutual acceptance, can Pakistan begin to change it's own internal dynamics and help to end the threat of terrorism around the world.
This is going to be a  long,drawn-out process, which should have started decades ago. At least now, there is hope in Washington, that informed, articulate people who, hopefully, understand and work within the historical and social context of other nations, will be able to offer wisdom and guidance in assistance to those who are so desperately seeking it.
I'm not sure if I have all my info on Pakistan so I may be wrong in what I'm about to say.   First I understand Pakistan knows that there are terrorist in their country and are choosing not to do anything about it? Is true that also would like us not to do anything either but want our financial help?  If the answer to those questions are true then Pakistan would like it's cake and eat it too?  Also if true then we should not be helping them.  Now if what I got from Obama and he intends to follow through is that he would like to work with Pakistan to fix this but if they don't want to cooperate the US will do what it has to, which I feel is fair as long as a sincere effort on both sides is done to work together for the sake of everyone.
President-elect Barak Obama has raised very high expectation all over trhe globe, especially Muslims. Muslims may try to find solace that future relationship between the US and the Muslim world might improve perceptibly. But so long as the US ME policy (which immensely influences the US attitude towards Muslims) does not change, there's very little hope.
shawkat ali; dhaka, bangladesh (Sent Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:15 AM)


Sorry man it's going to go downhill from here.  These great expectations will be a let down the day that Iran blows up Israel.  Obama's 'present' vote does not equal the courage needed to deem an appropriate response...  
What - the last line of the article says "Now it is up to Obama to improve the political and financial situation in Pakistan and in the whole world."!!!
I am not an Obama supporter, however I am an American of these United States...we should let PAKISTAN improve their financial situation...not us!  But we're there as much to protect ourselves from their lunacy and hate toward us as we are to protect the rights of the attacked innocents among them.  Get a grip!  I stopped feeding the birds in my neighborhood because they forgot how to look for their own food and just started screaming at my window every morning and pooping on my car!  Maybe the countries we've been helping that hate us so much should just be left alone.  Our economy would certainly improve if we kept all that cash over here!
Most foreign countries, rather than giving another administration a chance, just don't like The United States. So it doesn't make a difference who is running  the country.
Boy won't the Pakistani's that have little faith in Obama be in for a nice surprise as they find out that Obama is nothing like clueless arrogant Bush.  If I were a Pakistani I'd be pissed off at how "Warmonger" Bush kept violating Pakistani sovereignty with all those drone missile attacks.  But the Pakistani government has to get it's act together in ridding their country of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Hello,  All I have to say is "Rome wasn't built in a Day!"  There is NO quick fix for what our NEW, President Elect Barack OBama has to face and will inherit the "Mess" that the last person and his crew left for him that is in the WHITE HOUSE, on January 20th, 2009!!  Please give him a "Chance". You need to fully support OUR president elect OBAMA. Like Opara says "HOPE"  Give him hope!!! God Bless YOU!
I do not blame ppl in other parts of the world for feeling the resentment they do against our country. After all, many of their economies and their senses of securities have been jeopardized by our current administration. I do feel that Obama, though is a great addition to the world's eye. I think that failed Bush policies did a lot to help Obama win this election and I do not expect him and his yet to be formed administration to solve all the problems that exist in our country, especially throughout world, but I do feel that this move has pushed us in the right direction; the direction we needed to move in. Most of all, I'm just glad that we proved to the world that the view that they had of us was misconstrued and that we all banded 2gether and that voter turnout was large (especially us young voters...hooray to that) and that so many people cared and were involved in this election. Bush needed a kick in the butt and he got it big time.LOL
Pakistan is correct to be scared, Obama has clearly promised to be violent within Pakistan's borders, he does not represent change but more of the same aggressive policies all in the name of 'the war on terror' a war that has no borders and has no end.  Too bad for the Pakistani people.
I don't agree with this report. Being of Pakistani origin I do not know of a single Pakistani who does not support Obama. The majority of us are elated to have him aboard. I am a strong supporter on the war on terror as well as for the right of the US to protect itself. However I am hoping that Obama will do MORE then just attack attack attack. He needs to cut through the bureaucracy and the establishment of the war machine and get to the root of the issue. Where are these terrorists getting their state of the art weapons, training, and support from? A single garage sale takes weeks of planning efforts, time, support, and hard work. These guys have weapons and equipment that upper class working citizen in most countries cannot afford. These perpetrators are jobless, hopeless, and uneducated. So then how do they get all the training, equipment, weapons, and support? Who is supporting their family if all they do is plan and cause havoc? I am hoping Obama will get to the root of the issue. Resolve the Palestinian issue, get out of Iraq, be self-dependant and stop relying on the Arabs for oil. Aren't these the three complaints that the extremists have? They will have NO excuse for animosity towards the US then. Change we need, and I am hoping that an educated and self-made family man like Obama will deliver.
As a Pakistani American, I think it would be terrible thing for Obama to give Pakistan's current leadership any economic and military aid without strings. Given the reputation of Zardari, it is very much conceivable that Giving money to him will bring no change in socio-economic outlook of Pakistan in the near future. Pakistan needs Education, masses sending their kids to Madrassas because they can't afford to feed them, Pakistan needs independent Judiciary, not a penny for Zardari until all Judges are restored, judicial reform is also in order.Political and economic reforms, improving infrastructure, specially for the FATA region,I can't think of a thing that Pakistan must not improve for themselves before hoping someone else has to do for them.
The worse that the new Administration in the White House can do is what they have done in the last 50 years, giving handouts and weapons for alliance to dictators and corrupt leaders, without holding them accountable, without keeping tabs on their Swiss Bank accounts, all in the name of poor people of Pakistan. This is the change Pakistanis wants and deserves from the New US Administration.

If the Pakistani people do not believe that Obama can provide some miraculous, but unidentified "change", either in Pakistan, the US or anywhere else in this wide wide world, they, as a country are far smarter than the ostriches who voted in the US presidential election!
Hello,  All I have to say is Rome wasn't built in a day.  There is NO quick fix for what our new, President elect Barack Obama has to face and will inherit the Mess that the last person and his crew left for him that is in the White house, on January 20th, 2009.  Please give him a Chance. You need to fully support our president elect Obama. Like Oprah says Hope.  Give him hope... God Bless
I think pakistan and the rest of the world needs to realize that Obama is an american president, not pakistani not african not indonesian but American. Therefore, he will have  to protect and look after America's need first and because of this, people will realize that he is just a good president and no god. Pakistan needs a way to resolve their own issues and stop relying on the US to baby sit them and tell them what to do
If Obama is serious about dismantling the Paki terrorist apparatus, he firtsly needs to demand that the pakis handover AQK for questioning without the ISI looking over his shoulders. The questioning has toc ontinue for an extended period until we get to the bottom of the proliferation activities, organized theft of technology from the Netherlands and other countries.  During the entire period of questioning we need to ensure that he does not collude with his political masters in Pakistan on what to say and what not to say.

Similarly Oabam also needs to demand repatriation of Mohammed Gul (the former ISI chief) who the US knows was one of the chief financiers and organizers of the entire 9/11 conspiracy, at the BEHEST of the Paki govt.

We also need to demand immediate handover of Sheik Omar Sayeed (Daniel Pearl Killer and 9/11 financier), Dawood Ibrahim (another 9/11 financier), and provide unfrettered access to the US to hunt dowm OBL,a dn Mullah Omar, and dismantle the entire terrorist apparatus in all of Pakistan.

Unless these measures are adopted Pakistan will NEVER let the US, the west and India live in peace!
Pakistan and the rest of the world had better realize that BO will take care of the American People first.  HE promised this and this is why he was elected.  There is no more hand outs to people who do not like us very much,as Mccain stated.  Take your wagon and go elsewhere.  It is about time Our sick, Our needy and our hungry get the help and attention they deserve! Amen!
I, for one, am extremely happy that the US has apparently reached a new age of reason.  A time where a man is judged on his abilities and not his race or religion.  It would appear that much of the rest of the world is also happy with the recent election, although for many different reasons.  What struck me the most here was how the rest of the world seems to think that the US owes them something.  We are supposed to fix their problems and yet......we are viewed as bullies by the majority of the world who would like to see us dry and blow away, so to speak.  They don't want us in their countries and yet do little if anything to fix their own problems.  I know little of middle eastern culture and politics.  I don't begin to think that I could ever understand in 10 lifetimes and with a busload of advisors and historians the social and cultural problems of a region that has a history of tribal wars that stretches back for centuries.  Our nation is much too young to comprehend the forces that drive this part of the world.  I do, however, have somewhat of an understanding of human nature.  It is easy to expect someone else to take control and then blame them when things do not turn out as you would like.  While I am all for helping out those who help themselves or are unable to help themselves, I take issue with those who are capable and yet do nothing and then blame someone else.  Don't think we, as a nation, are going to let you have a social and political environment that encourages violent radical movements that directly affects our own well being and do nothing.  Do not expect us to sit idly by and do not expect us to fix your problems when we do take matters into our own hands.  That is not our motive for being there.
The democrats are the ones who left the "Mess"...economic crisis, fannie freddie.. All the HANDOUTS!  Harold from PA You have some sense.. God be with us!  I cannot believe half of America fell for all the "hype" and eloquent speaking of Obama... That has absolutely NOTHING to do with whether you can run a country, I believe you/we all will be very sorry!  Here come the handouts... God please be with US.  MCCAIN SUPPORTER.
I would cut off all aid to anyone not willing to make something happen on their own.  

Why should the U.S. send billions of $$$ to Pakistan and have Pakistan complain when we are going after terrorist areas while they sit on the side doing nothing.  Kind of reminds me of our congress.  Do nothing but talk.

The action is easy and simple.  "Pakistan, until you decide to get on your feet and do something about the terrorist strongholds INSIDE YOUR BORDERS, the money faucet is turned OFF.  When we are satisfied that the Pakistani Government is serious about this simple item, then we MAY turn on the money again.  MAY, not WILL."

Simple enough, don't ya think?  That should be done with ANYONE we give aid to who aren't doing anything for themselves.  Imagine the money that could be saved and used for OUR OWN COUNTRY.

Thank You and Good Day.
Ernestine Brookins, Hudson, MA

Thank you.  I could not have said it any better.  Lets all say a prayer to our newly elected president, he will need it.
Obama has a tough row to hoe, no doubt. Some of the writers above seem to have a better grasp of things than our elected officials.  Pakistan, like so many other Third World countries, must create change while maintaining stability, a difficult if not impossible task under the best of conditions.
Of course Pakistan isn't too happy with the election, considering Obama wants to bomb Pakistan (a US ally) and make friends with Iran (not a US ally).
Obama, much to the dismay of many, is not the second coming of Christ.  His global influence will be limited.  In addition, his hands will be tied trying to handle the domestic crisis facing him now.  Issues with drones killing criminal terrorists will not be at the top of his priorities.  By the way, Bush did not lose and McCain was no Bush.
To immediatly pull troops and say 'lets talk' doesn't work. I'm sorry, but that won't get anyone anywhere. A stage withdrawl, that leads to increasing talks may help. but seriously. Obama is in and that is fantastic. He has so much work ahead of him and his cabinet, but if anyone has a shot at affecting change, he might. Oh and stop slagging people for making Bush comments. Bush is a reference to a Republican party that has spent eight years screwing up.  
To all of you this has been interesting to read, Can one man save a nation, chances are slim, can he save the world chances are very slim. But there is one who gives all hope and that is Jesus Christ.  Take your troubles to him and he will give you hope.  Pray for our great nation of the USA.  Mr. Obama will need all of us as a nation praying to make the right decisions for all us "Joe the Plummer" kinda folks.
The tribal area of Pakistan is home to ethnic pashtuns and please google Pashtun people and find out why the mediocre pakistani army is having hard time pushing them back in the corner, for once the Pashtun obliterated the british army in the 19th century(The great games), the indian army in kashmir in the 1950's and the russian army in the 1980s.. the U.S can probably help pakistan by making its army modern and much stronger while staying out of the conflict itself to the north in afghanistan
Check out the blog responses to this article from VK in Mumbai, Dennis P. Habem in Hof Germany, and Ali in TX.  
These people back up their opinions with actual information and experience.  They make very interesting points and I especially appreciated their input.  How amazing is it that people from all over the globe are inspired enough to think about these issues and bother commenting on them because of their interest in our election.  Whether you backed Obama or not, you can't deny that his candidacy and election has given us a great opportunity to communicate with one another, assess our priorities, and contemplate our common goals.  
Now for the hard part of actually getting these things done!  "Be the change you wish to see in the world." -M.Ghandi


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1659613

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.