ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



China’s Muslim dilemma in ‘The New Frontier’

Posted: Friday, August 08, 2008 6:55 AM
Filed Under:

KHOTAN, Xinjiang Autonomous Region – Across much of China, strangers upon being introduced will ask each other, "Where is your ancestral home?"

Image: An Uighur couple in Khotan
Adrienne Mong / NBC News
An Uighur couple in Khotan

But in the far northwestern province of Xinjiang, they ask, "Are you Han Chinese?"

Xinjiang, which means "New Frontier" in Mandarin, is home to China’s restive minority Uighur population. It’s a remote and rugged region long known for its simmering ethnic tension, an historical antipathy towards the majority Han Chinese, and the occasional outbreak of separatist activism.

And with the Summer Olympics upon us -- an event which Beijing hopes to carry off seamlessly -- Xinjiang's unique population and the potential conflict they could create, have come under heightened scrutiny from central government authorities.

Officials in Kashgar, scene of a bomb attack that killed 16 Chinese policemen this week, have said they've tightened controls on potential troublemakers who might attack the Games.

‘The New Frontier’
The Han, or ethnic Chinese, comprise more than 90 percent of China’s 1.3 billion population. The rest come from the country’s 55 officially recognized ethnic minority groups.

Of these, the Uighurs make up a tiny fraction and number fewer than nine million. The population’s relatively small size would be unremarkable were it not for several factors.

One is culture and ethnicity: the Uighurs practice Islam, speak a Turkic language, use an Arabic-based script, and don’t look remotely Chinese. Second, they are concentrated in Xinjiang, an autonomous region that is one-sixth of China’s territory -- sensitive frontier land that borders Central Asia and brims with the promise of vast oil and mineral riches.

Third, many Uighurs have long resented the expanding Chinese presence, which over the decades has grown so fast that, in fifty years, ethnic Chinese have gone from making up under ten per cent of Xinjiang’s overall population to nearly half.

Image: Statue of Chairman Mao greeting an Uighur
Adrienne Mong / NBC News
In Khotan's main square, one can see statues of Chairman Mao greeting an Uighur, Kurban Tulum, in 1958.

This demographic shift was clear as we travelled around the region recently. On my first trip to Xinjiang in 1994, most of the towns evoked Central Asia with their dusty oases, mosques, low-rise clay houses, colorful open bazaars, and dirt roads. This time, they looked more like Chinese cities: gleaming but nondescript boxy high-rises, paved highways, and cars everywhere.

Moreover, most Han Chinese people we met this time were not migrants to Xinjiang but locally born. And their growing numbers has meant tougher competition for jobs and fewer resources, and, as a result, greater ethnic tension.

The income gap
In Korla, we encountered a young Uighur man who was about to vacate the house he had called home all his life. The building was built by his grandfather and – along with others on former farmland on the edge of the city – was primed for demolition to make way for a high-rise populated by ethnic Chinese.

The young man, crouched on the dirt next to his 80 year old mother, said life had grown hard for them since they had stopped farming on their land a few years ago. Jobs for people like him, he said, were scarce; when they did find work, it was of the menial, low-paying variety. "Our Chinese is not very good," he explained in heavily-accented Mandarin. "So we can’t find good jobs."

Despite a policy of inward investment dubbed "Go West" that was launched eight years ago, many Uighurs say they have not benefited directly from Beijing’s development strategy and appear to be languishing on the fringes of Xinjiang’s economy – farming or working in cottage industries.

Some Chinese, however, believe the source of the problem isn’t economic policy but within Uighurs themselves. One night in Korla, we went to a dinner organized by a fixer – an ethnic Chinese woman, born in Xinjiang, who had helped organize logistics for other foreign journalists. Savvy and clever, she joined in a frank discussion about the opportunity gap between the Han Chinese and the Uighurs, and betrayed some of the local stereotyping.

When one of the guests, an English teacher at an elite local school, observed that there were fewer than ten Uighur students compared to hundreds of ethnic Chinese, she piped up. "Oh, the Uighurs are always complaining about opportunities," she said. "But they are lazy and unmotivated. They don’t work hard."

Image: Correspondent Ian Williams, cameraman Kyle Eppler, and soundman Simon Ballmer film a standup on the dunes outside Khotan
Adrienne Mong / NBC News
Correspondent Ian Williams, cameraman Kyle Eppler, and soundman Simon Ballmer film a standup on the dunes outside Khotan

Terror threat?
The income gap amplifies long-simmering ethnic tensions in the province. Like Tibet, China’s other troublesome ethnic region, Xinjiang enjoyed intermittent periods of independence and autonomy until 1949, when the Communist government took power in Beijing. The area was declared a Chinese province and, six years later, was deemed "an autonomous region" under the People’s Republic of China.

Although there are signs of Islam everywhere – people go to prayer on Fridays and women wear headscarves – mosques are forbidden to broadcast the call to prayer on loudspeaker, imams are vetted by the state, and, according to Nicholas Bequelin of Human Rights Watch, young men must be over the age 18 before they can set foot in a mosque.

"There is a very strict framework for religion in Xinjiang," said Bequelin. "Anything outside of [the state-sanctioned religious system] is considered illegal religious activities [sic] and invites immediate state repression."

VIDEO: China tries to control tense province

Heavy-handed police tactics have increased with the advent of the Summer Olympics; some Chinese analysts have said the key issue here isn’t economic or ethnic disparity, but terrorism.

"The main problem of Xinjiang is separatism," said Li Sheng, Dean of China’s Borderland History and Geography Research Centre at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. "Terrorist activities, including activities using human rights, sovereignty, and other extreme religious activities, are all parts of the main problem."

Provincial officials this year claim to have uncovered several "terror plots" in Xinjiang and a handful of suspected bomb attacks have been reported, including one this week that killed 16 policemen in Kashgar, near the border with Pakistan.

But many observers discount the terrorism threat, saying it has been hyped up by Chinese authorities in order to justify a sweeping crackdown on Uighurs.

"Since 1998, the Chinese government itself has not documented one terrorist action in Xinjiang," said Bequelin. "They claim to have foiled many plots but there is no hard evidence that there is any kind of Islamic inspired terrorist movement in Xinjiang at the moment."

The real danger, these skeptics argue, is that the worsening economic gap and stepped up repression and censorship over the long run will transform resentment into extremism, driving underground legitimate movements pressing for greater freedoms.

Click here for complete coverage of the Beijing Olympics.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The sad part is, the US did the same thing in the creation of this country.  We sit here in this society created by pushing the Indians out and complain when another does it.  Humans groups/societies have been pushing other groups/societies around since the beginning of human history.  I am sure the Uyghur's pushed out some group when they moved in how many centuries ago.
I'm not saying I agree with terrorist tactics or that the Uigher's resorting to such violence is justifiable HOWEVER when you have a minority, or a group of people that don't have the political or economic power to influence better policies for their benefit they always resort to terrorism because that is the only weapon they have. Terrorist groups in the Middle East, Chechnya, Shining Path in Peru, etc. They all had the same poor socio economic political status so terrorism became their only extreme option to draw attention. The problem is that it always draws negative attention rather than force people to look at the real issues of why people are resorting to violence in the first place. The Chinese have a population issue yes, and they are trying to manage the land better yes, but in the process they are ignoring the rights cultural differences with in their own society. China can not force all of its people to be homogenous and totally assimilated when you have minority groups of different ethnicities, languages,and culture. The problem is China's intolerance and refusal to compromise.

Yet on the Flip side the article doesn't go into details about the Uigher's economic opression. By that I mean is their low economic status more self imposed or is it really the fault of the Chinese? Its a dog eat world and competition is fierce so you can't really hate the player, hate the game. The Chinese are expanding and they gotta live somwhere so if they end up on your door step and start having acess to better jobs when you yourself are poorly educated its to be expected. Yet as the article said the Ugher's have not benefited from the development programs so does that mean the educational system has worked against them due to prejudice? Or are the Uigher's turning inward because of the imposing Chinese and become like many of their Muslim brothers who in retaliation to change refuse to educate their children with nothing but the Koran and than complain that the West is keeping them down when their women are all illiterate? I'm just playing Devil's advocate because you can't take a story at face value.
Seems to me the only religions that are commiting acts of terrorism is the Muslim religion. Why is that?

I really feel bad for these people, like Americans, we want to be left alone also.Take your terrorism back to your own country......
if hitlar would have just waited 10 more years to overtake poland, we wouldent have this problem
This same tactic of overwhelming the local population and destroying the local culture is happening elsewhere, too, like in the united states.  How sad.  All these native people ever really wanted was to be left alone.
The issues are quite sad, as are the many problems that emaniate from ethnic diversity and land control.  Of course, land acquisition is just one of the many elements in the agenda to acquire dominance that wreaks havoc on a global scale.  Unfortunately, with a world population growth of over 200,000 new people each and every day, these problems are bound to increase as long as greedy humans are in charge.  Certain ethnic groups do tend to encourage a blatant disregard for the well being of others and a strong determination for the acquisition of power and control.  These dynamics exist globally.  Unfortunately, Jesus Christ, the perfect example of love and humility, has become less of a role model, even within the ethnic groups in which he is to be their king.  Ethnic groups which do not have Jesus as their role model have little chance of working and living together in harmony.
Thank you R Hahn for your input.
As outsiders to a country who has largely kept to itself I believe we should educate ourselves to the situation before commenting on the 'right' and 'wrong' practices we may view as intolerance and / or oppression. [Here the Media has a power that they can and should handle with integrity.]
However, I also firmly believe that each ethnic culture should be the ONLY ones to determine if they wish to be annexed into/taken over by another.
Religous freedoms are exactly that - freedoms, and no power (military/governmental or private group) should be allowed to take liberties and think they have a right to decide who can or cant practice a particular faith. 'Might' does not equate to 'right'.
Should a minority wish to request support to allow them to retain their freedom to live their ethnic way of life, that too, is also for them and only them to decide upon and request.
We, both individuals and ethnic groups, should encourage and value our differences, our uniqueness - it brings a richness to humankind and would allow for a more peaceful co-existance.
The chinese people are an autocratic, rough, spiritles society, with no empathy for their own or humanity. (Look at the blood bank and aids issue) They are at the poing Europe was during the 100 year wars and during colonization and the industrial revolution. The communist party are equal to the feudal lords and  colonials where a human hierarchy is set in their mind. Their history is also very vicious and cruel. They are not a trustworthy people, as we can see how they add lead and poisonous chemicals to human and animal food they export. They have not developed the respect  for humanity western societies have develope through the enlightment and western philosophy. They are the "nouveau riche" in the this new world, seeking greed and power as in their past dynasties. Democracy, human rights and respect for others cultures and humans will not happen unless they literaly and psychologically "westernize". They have jumped from a medeival society right into modernity. They also beleive they are the superior race and they see Africans asless then human. So any hope for creating world peace and respect and freedom for humanity is not likely. We need to really be very strong with them or they are likely to enslave the rest of us in the next 100 years. Be cautious. (Chinese people living outside of china in western societies would probably be more progressive and understand the issues).
I don't think that a communist country, under its ideals, could claim to be a melting pot. The people don't have a choice because it is not a democracy. The history of most Western countries are those of  melting pots, I am an reality of that mindset. I know where my people came from, but I also know who I am and I celebrate both. I believe other counteries welcome transplanted people to assimilate into their culture, but assume their own culture will not be lost with transplants. When in Rome, eh.
All non-Chinese of China(Tibetons,Mongols,Uigurs and Kazakhs)only want to save their culture,languages and religions from assimilation by Dragon Nation.Period.
We should not criticize China - islam is dangerous - their god Allah REQUIRES them to kill any non-muslim and to fight for control/domination of whichever land they live on whether as indiginous people or as visitors.  Remember Kosovo - muslim migrants from Albania increasingly flocked there and now they have declared independence - outrightly stolen the land from their Serbian (christian) hosts. The US under Clinton and later Bush has helped them islamize part of Serbian teritory. The same happened in Croatia.  We should leave China to deal with them as effectively as they see fit.  Watch and see -- soon the city of Dearborn, MI will declare Sharia Law.
Read the Koran and note the speeches and writings of Islamic scholars/Imams and you will understand what I am talking about.  The terrorists are the true muslims.
Muslim belief always does its greatest work where ignorance and The Gospel is surpressed. Expect this cancer to grow until "Tubal" (Biblical name for China) the King of the North (Ezek. 38&39) get into a world wide conflict started by PUT (Biblical name for Persia IRAN & IRAQ) when between 2/3 to 3/4 of all the inbabitants of the earth are destroyed.........
Muslim belief always does its greatest work where ignorance and The Gospel is surpressed. Expect this cancer to grow until "Tubal" (Biblical name for China) the King of the North (Ezek. 38&39) get into a world wide conflict started by PUT (Biblical name for Persia IRAN & IRAQ) when between 2/3 to 3/4 of all the inbabitants of the earth are destroyed.........
It's amazing to read this article, and try to understand its naïve content.  Xinjiang is a Chinese province, it’s one six of the total size of China. China is not forcing these people out of the homeland, and telling them you have no right to call yourself Uyghur.  The Uyghur are still Chinese citizen, they still have a Chinese passport.  China is simply telling its citizens to simply spread out, go west build new cities, develop your country.  If the Uyghur don’t want to learn Mandarin and develop their skills, to join the world in the information age, is that the Chinese responsibility?  It’s Islam responsibility, they want to stay the way they’ve been.  Confucius asked its follower to work hard and learn and develop, and Islam asked its follower to follow a very strict way of life that teaches them how to eat, how to beat your wife, how to kill and everything else. They have a strict well defined way of life that will not let them venture outside of it. They believe they have god’s word and strict laws, they don’t need the Chinese to tell them what’s right and wrong, the Uyghur feels that they know it all and they do not need to learn more. That’s the answer to their source of laziness.
Despite the one-child policy, the population of China is increasing at a ferocious rate.  They have to go somewhere and have been moving steadily into the non-Han sections of that part of the world, pushing out the previous occupants who lived along the ancient Silk routes.  At this rate in 40 years we won't be able to produce enough food for all of us - which will lead to wars.  I don't know if there is a solution.
The probem is not that the Uighurs are a minority. The problem is the Uighur Muslims who seek to impose Islamic sharia law on the people of China, thereby taking them back to the seventh century. It's about Muslims subjugating native Chinese to a condition known as dhimmitude - slaves to Islam. That cannot be allowed to happen.

I don't know how many people remember the horror of the Islamic fascists at the 1972 games in Munich. The Chinese government is repressive in some way, to be sure; but, compared to fundamental Islamofascists, they're as benevolent as the Minnesota Jaycees.

Here's a situation where everyone wins: If the Uighurs insist upon praying five times a day facing East, then the Chinese government should allow them to emigrate to Saudi Arabia, or another Muslim counttry of their choice. If they refuse, and instead want to impose sharia law on China, then they should take the consequences. Aftr all, the dream of every Muslim is to die for their tribal god Allah, so there also is a win-win situation.

Far better that 100,000 Uighurs die for their tribal god, than innocent athletes be killed, as happened in 1972.

Death is the eternal peace.  
So a country is full of people and to the west are vast, largely unpopulated areas to move into.  It's like manifest destiny all over again.  Really, we in America don't have a whole lot of moral authority to stand on.  I guess these people are all going to end up living on reservations.  Listen to the words of the Chinese person who posted above: "There are barely any of these ethnic groups and they inhabit a large amount of land.The Chinese are just trying to use land efficiently and any destruction of culture is not their fault."  Does this sound like some American 150 years ago or what?!  China knows it has too many people and it needs to put them somewhere.  At least kudos to them for making the effort to control future population growth.  
To A Chinese in Eugene OR: In regards to the (Han) Chineses you claim that "..any destruction of culture is not their fault." Destruction of mosques, temples, monastaries, killing & imprisoning imams, monks, nuns, forbidding religious practice among minority groups in China/Tibet/Xinjiang by the (Han) Chinese IS the fault of the (Han) Chinese, for their benefit.
The simple solution is to establish Native Xinjiangese Reservations and put them in there.  Then, let them build a few casinos.  Joking aside, this is all too similar to French Canadians wanting independence, or native Hawaiian complaining they are losing their culture.  This happens all over the world (and through out human history).  Not just in Xinjiang or only in Tibet.
My understanding is that the two emperors prior to the "Last emperor" the Imperial Chinese expended their blood and treasure fighting a Muslim insurgecy in these areas.That struggle left the empire poor,week and unable to resist the subsequent European colonial incursions/invasions of their country.
Kashgar is not close to the border with Pakistan, its closer to Kyrgyztan and Tajikistan.
This same tactic of overwhelming the local population and destroying the local culture is happening elsewhere, too, like in Tibet.  How sad.  All these native people ever really wanted was to be left alone.

Leslie Halls (Sent Friday, August 08, 2008 1:06 PM)



I am pretty sure thats what the American Native Indians...must have said too...
Wow! Ethnic groups that are not native to the land moving in and taking control over the native population.  And, now the original inhabitants are taking a back seat in both economics and politics.  I'm sure glad nothing like that has ever happened here in the United States.
Yes, the problem can be solved by sending Tibetan and Uighur children to school--schools which are run by the same people who are trying to eradicate the local cultures.  Maybe, Tibetan and Uighur alike, are content with their way of life.  
Sounds like the Chinese have a handle on potential and real islamaniacs, with any luck they'll continue moving west into the rest of islam and overpopulate it with Chinese and strict religio-fantasy laws. Maybe they will even by-pass Tibet for this opportunity, wouldn't that be awesome?! PS I am not Chinese, I am American RED-WHITE AND BLUE
It is in fashion today that when muslims in any part of the world stand up and fight for their rights and want to be diferrent they are labelled 'terrorists' but people of other beliefs are fighting for 'Human Rights'.

The western world want a bogey man. First it was the communists now it is the muslims. Come to think of it, the world wars and other wars were not started by either of them yet they are the evil ones.

Western world should look inside themselves and see where things have gone wrong. Don't impose your views on other cultures, respect and accept them as they are another beautiful color in the rainbow as yours.

Live and let live
While we are trying to introduce democracy to muslims that is a strange idea to them, China simply exercises an iron fist and intimidation under the pretense of welcoming all its minorities. Thus we may fail while they may succeed as the time will show.
Why all the comments must be reviewed and approved - read censored. It is already like in China. Why debating comments by others is such a taboo?
For example, Ophelia is wrong about diversity versus the melting pot. America was much better off during the melting pot times than it is now in times of diversity - read divisivness. Some were certainly interested to end the melting pot and divide the nation. Who they are - you answer yourself.
What is this ??? from A Chinese,Eugene,Oregon (Sent Friday, August 08, 2008 12:00 PM)"There are barely any of these ethnic groups and they inhabit a large amount of land.The Chinese are just trying to use land efficiently and any destruction of culture is not their fault." ...Then whose fault is it?  Sounds like the American West with the Indians..


Dear "A Chinese, Eugene Oregon" Above,
What are you crazy?! You stated;
"Chinese are just trying to use land efficiently and any destruction of culture is not their fault." Americans are a new culture that destroyed many Native American cultures during colonial times. This was wrong. The reason that it is wrong, is that just because people are few in number and a large populayion wants to use "the land" doesn't make "the land" the property of the larger population. Just because a government decides that land usage needs to be managed does not mean that the government can just run rough shod over people and ruin the lifestyles to which those people are accustomed. Plans must be in place to help people learn new ways and this takes time and effort. Generations to be exact. And only then with extreme care, otherwise,"destruction of culture" will commit destruction of culture on the larger INVADING population in return:) Have a happy life in America:)
Gentrification is always justified. Especially if economics are involved. Yeah right.
Just like the Native Americans...

it's amazing how Americans never see themselves in the actions of others. Looks like America is a good role model for the Chinese, not just in economics, but in minority oppression as well.
Eventually we will see a single strong republic come out of Central Asis.  It may be Kazakhstan or it may be Uzbekistan.  That country will swallow its neighbors and then try to annex this region of China in the name of ethnic unity.  A world war could result from this.
India needs to follow same policies in its Muslim majority provinces as China does in Xingiang and Tibet to promote national unity like mosques must forbidden to broadcast the call to prayer on loudspeaker, imams must be vetted by the state, and young men must be over the age 18 before they can set foot in a mosque. Let the tightly controlled access to Western Press offer lip service to separatist movements. Western leaders can also offer all the lip service they want.
From Han Dynasty (200 b.c.)the Han Chinese's presence in the New Frontier has grown more and more powerful,in respects of economy,culture,military and politics etc..
I believe that the studies or observations on the relationship between the Han Chinese and the Uyghur Chinese should be placed in the historical background.
If this was an issue elsewhere, it would have a western spin and be portrayed as terrorism. Its all the same.. Islamic religion tends to harbor destructive properties. How well do you think the U.S. would fare if we were placed on the border of the middle-east? I have a feeling we would be "tightening" up security as well.
 Conditions of the Uighur Muslims are deteriorating because the Chinese are full of drive. Their  ambition and ordinary arrogance rules whatever policies they make. With them its all about pride and greed. As a result of indoctrination in marxist philosophy they have no appreciation for traditional Islamic values such as humility, defference to others, polite manners and respect for women.
  Uighur women are brutally mistreated by the Chinese and every Muslim knows it is an indignity that cannot be allowed to stand -that helpless people are subjected to near slavery conditions, assault and brutal police repression. Territorial encroachment is the open wound.
As with Tibet- the Chinese have shown their complete disregard for ordinary compassion and human kindness. They don't have it in themselves! How can they appreciate it in Buddist thought? In traditional Islam? They kill, rob and destroy people of religious conviction, Christians included. This vicious trait has not changed since Marx, Mao, Stalin, Brezhnev or Baath party Arabs  or persian Mujahiddin Khalq-the  marxist terrorist groups in Iraq.
Whenever states  mix Islamic peoples  with communism and Marxist ideologies millions of Muslims die:
Pol Pot -genocided the Cham Cambodian Muslims, Saddam Hussain 3 million In his reign of terror muslims were the first to die. Stalin killed 20 million 1/3 of them at least were Muslims, MaoTse Tung killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims -None of them ever wanted to be part of a Marxist state.  Soviets?  countless numbers of Muslims enslaved, displaced,tortured , Mingistu in Ethiopia a large number, Putin 800 thousand in Chchnya a full genocide.
  All of these marxist states killed Muslims on a genocidal scale. This continues. The global genocide on Muslim people accross the globe.
 That is why no Muslim wants to be like them! We will stay far away from their immoral cultures too!
They are atheists. No Muslims can submit to the authority of Marxist states because they place themselves above God. Above human rights too.  
MUSLIMS ALL OVER THE WORLD SHOULD BOYCOTT CHINESE PRODUCTS.CHINA HAS JOINED TOGETHER WITH THE REST OF THE WORLD IN ATTEMPTING TO SUPPRESS ISLAM AND MUSLIMS.STEALING THE PROPERTY AND RESOURCES OF A NATION  BRINGS ABOUT REACTION FROM THAT NATION-THEY ARE THEN CALLED TERRORISTS(BUSH LOGIC)
THE HAN CHINESE GOVERNMENT SHOULD LET THE TIBETANS AND XINGJIANG PEOPLE TO HOLD A  REFERENDUM TO DECIDE THEIR FUTURES; WE HAN CHINESE ANCESTORS ANNEXED TIBET AND XINGJIANG VIA EITHER FORCE OR LURE,THE THEN-TIBETANS AND UIGHURS WENT FOR THIS; BUT NOW WE HAN CHINESE ADMINSTRATION CAN NOT GIVE THEM THE SAME GOOD LURE/ TREATMENTS AS BEFORE,IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE THAT THOSE MINORITIES RISE UP AGAINST US;GEOGRAPHICALLY AND HISTORICALL, XINGJIANG IS THE HOMELAND TO UIGHURS AND TIBET TO TIBETANS, WE HAN ANCESTORS ONLY OCCUPIED THESE LANDS AND CARRIED OUT AN IRON-FISTED POLICY OR A CARROT-STICK POLICY TO THEM THE MINORITY PEOPLE.WE HAN CHINESE REFUSE TO GIVE UP THESE LANDS DUE TO ITS RICH NATURAL RESOURCES AND MILITARY LOCATIONS. AND WE HAN MAINLAND GOVERNMENT REPRESS THE UPRISINGS AS CRACK-DOWN ON SEPERATISTS, ACTUALLY, THOSE MINORITIES ARE FIGHTING FOR THEIR INDEPENDENCE ! WE HAN CHINESE EVEN DOG ATE DOG ON THE TIANANMEN SQUARES IN 1989, THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD REALIZE THAT THE CURRENT CHINESE GOVERNMENT IS RUTHLESS AND SAVAGE;WE THE OVERSEAS HAN CHINESE SHOULD SEE THIS THRU AND AGREE WITH ME TO GIVE FREEDOM TO TIBET AND UIGHUR !
Han chinese are colonist in Xinjiang.They have no right to be in Xinjiang.The Uighurs are a nation and their struggle for freedom is just.  
@ Leslie Halls: All these native people ever really wanted was to be left alone.

Leslie, I totally agree with you, ...these native people, including native American, people of Northern Irland, Morris, Aussie aboriginals. Have I missed any others native people here? please tell me. Thanks.
It's not terror when it's your own country you are trying to defend from assimilation. Also, the days of "hey they have to much land and aren't using it properly" are over... that is not an excuse chinese man in Oregon... that's just a f'ing pathetic party line excuse. For the record it was a p**s poor excuse when they called it "manifest destiny" also. Some American guy.  I don't much care for anyone who preaches extremism, however, sometimes you have to do what you have to do. Just ask George Washington and the Continental Army, I guess they were considered "terrorists" too. : )
If you ask me, I think it's the same tactic the colonialists used in America and Australia, just to name two places.
I HOPE, THE DEMAND AND NEED OF 'UIGHURS' POPULATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS ON HUMANITARIAN GROUND. NOT TAINTED WITH RELIGION,ETHNICITY,LAGGING BEHIND,MINORITY OR POLITICS WHICH I BELIEVE MAIN TONE OF COMMUNISM OF MAO.
SAZZAD,BROOKLYN,NY
A sentence buried in this story read "Like Tibet,China's other troublesome ethnic region".That was not lost on me,Tibet is a occupied country,not a region.The Han are being brought into Tibet by the thousands to overwhelm and destroy the people of Tibet.I will grant you that my country is presently engaged in the occupation of another nation but we are just trying to place muscle in a energy rich area for our energy/national security.Oh,and BTW I'm no fan of Islam,I think the only reason its called a "religion" and not "cult" is by virtue of it's size.That said,China reminds me of a spoiled schoolyard bully.    
To Hahn,
Really do not know where you got your stats from but the population of muslims in China is not more than 22 million. About 8-9 million in Xinjiang, and about 10 million in Ningxia, Gansu..etc. Where did you get your info from...............the muslim population in China was larger in the past....40-50 million. Some source may show the population as larger than 20 million but these use data from the early 19 century.  
The world's largest muslim population if in Indonesia with about 200 million.    
Oh,and one more thing,you wont be reading any blogs here from someone in China.The Chinese government only trusts their people to make 3$ Christmas lights for Wal-Mart,not to openly and freely discuss issues with a world wide community.I am very thankful to live in the free world.
"We will only approve comments------"

Question: Who is "We" ?
What are your names?
Who gives you authority to "approve" ?
lemon said
"Why the Tibetans and Uighurs don't just send their kids to school and learn the truth about the world."

You dont learn the truth about the world while going to school in China. You learn what they want you to learn, as is the case in all communist states.
It amazes me how naive people are! The history of the world has been the cstrong dominating the weak. There is not one exception I can think of where this has not been the case. Think about it,1 billion, 321 million Han Chinese are going to ignore a vast virtually unpopulated region that also is rich in natural resources. Only a fool would see any other outcome, but the long-term assimilation of ethnic minorities in China.It's funny I've never seen any teepees pitched in downtown Denver.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1251707

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.