ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



This security scanner will spare your blushes

Posted: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:49 PM
Filed Under:

By Michele Neubert, NBC News Producer

STOCKHOLM, Sweden – Ever had the desire to wear X-ray specs?

Well, maybe that’s why the ThruVision, a new security scanner that looks through clothing and can detect weapons from up to 25 yards away, was all the rage at a recent international counterterrorism conference in Stockholm, Sweden.

VIDEO: See-thru security scanner

But instead of the usual X-rays, the machine uses non-invasive "terahertz" technology, as I learned from Mikael Karlstrom, the machine’s designer.

And for those hoping to see everything, it’s a disappointment.

"It’s completely passive, which means it doesn’t radiate anyone or anything," Karlstrom said. As opposed to current security systems that send rays toward the object or person being scanned, this system detects items by receiving energy from terahertz rays – low level electromagnetic waves which all people and objects emit naturally.

Terahertz radiation can pass through a wide variety of materials – like clothing, paper, or wood – but it cannot penetrate metal or water. As with a regular security scanner, other objects give off a different frequency and thus can be seen on the scanner’s screen.

"The effect on the passenger being screened is the same as taking a photo without a flash," said Karlstrom. "It doesn’t invade your privacy because we don’t show your anatomy, your naked bits at all – just the objects hidden on your body."

As I watched, the scanning screen showed human silhouettes outlined in a vague outline, but hidden objects on the body were detected as darker images.

Karlstrom explained that the new scanner allows authorities to do both overt and covert surveillance because the machines can operate from a distance.

"With this new device you are able to pinpoint a person 10, 15, 20 [yards] away and discern if they have as explosive device on them," he said. "So you can either tell people that they are being surveyed, or we can do it covertly and not say anything."

The machines cost around $200,000 and, according to Karlstrom, they are selling well in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

 "I think it’s a much needed complement to the security systems that are in place," said Makram Bichara, another delegate at the conference.

"According to tests done in the U.S. by the Transport and Security Agency, agents were able to carry weapons through full functioning security checks without being detected," Bichara continued. "So I'd welcome anything that can improve on that."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This is by far the most promising security technology yet. However, what struck me most was the revelation that "The machines cost around $200,000 and, according to [machine designer Mikael] Karlstrom, they are selling well in Europe, the Middle East and Asia."

Given the failing of our domestic security measures noted by Makram Bichara, there can be no reasons given for the US not to be amongst the most active buyers other than those stemming from political, isolationist or protectionist attitudes and practices.

Safety and security must apply first and foremost to people - not profits.
Is there a machine that can point out fliers who will  be rude on the plane (noisy, fussy,) and then put a big R on their forehead?  THAT I would pay extra for so that I could quickly change seats if there are any available.
Horribly invasive, regardless of resolution.  A fundamental violation of our Fourth Amendment rights, regardles of the public "utility," which is not proven.  Why not require everyone to submit to this day by day?  Because it's wrong. It's illegal.  
A non-invasive system that works at range? Most excellent. Hopefully, this will improve security while increasing the speed in which passengers can pass through security lines.
This is simply waste of 200 grands.

A metal object (weapon) can easily be shielded from it by a layer of something with the same emission signature, as the human body. For example, by a steak, warmed to 100F. So simple.
 This equipment is needed at the checkpoints in our combat zones for the safety of our troops. whe the men dress like women.david robertson
Just like Roundup (Biodegradable). Do we really have enough proof that this is not all bullshit. I am sure that it will detect bioweapons, a new form of suicide bomber. Bombs are obsolete as terrahertz devices have so much power if modified the right way. The problem of 1907 and the eleven will cause so much suffering just like the ww1, wwii AND WW3 COMING UP. POISONED EARTH YIELDS NOTHING AND THE RICH MAN CAN NOT EAT HIS GOLD. ROCKEFELLER DID NOT HAVE BRAINS AND THAT IS PROVEN IN HOW MUCH THEY STOLE FROM GOOD PEOPLE. THE JP MORGANS AND ROTHSCHILDS ARE IN THE SAME BOAT.  
I wonder if anyone can get this, or if it is a controlled item.  I think that it could be a problem for people such as undercover police or informants who may wear a wire.
could this device detect body bombs that are carried on the person of suicides blowing up our troups at war?
This sounds like a great machine.  Being that it can be used from a distance away means that this security device will not slow any passengers in route to their departure.  Anything that helps security is obviously good.  But if it were to slow passengers down, I feel as if people would not be in favor of this device.

That fact that it is a passive device helps assure me of less toxic rays, meaning a healthier security screening versus devices that may be more harmfull to the human body through emittions of radiation and such.

I think that these devices should be mandatory at all airports serving the public.
I think that this is a really cool idea. Even more so because it can be used from a distance. If somebody is acting "strange", like they are doing something or carrying something wrong, we can now do the surveiliance on the QT.

Now, they also need to find a way to get chemical detection added to it. I think that this would go a long way into keeping people safe in a variety of venues. At a cost of $200,000, they could almost place one at train turnstyles too.

A much needed system for the safety of people and places in a day when you will never know just who the bad people may be.
Let the technology develop a bit more before jumping on the bandwagon.  The reality of it all is simple, you really can't stop someone intent on harming others if they are fully prepared to die doing it.  Security checkpoints make just as good targets as boarding gates.  Unless these devices are arrayed in such a way as to give a layered coverage area, they will be just as worthless as our current metal detectors when there are 100's of people packed into a small area with no pre-screening.  Imagine a suicide bomber detonating himself in the Atlanta Airport security line during the Thanksgiving holiday #1 travel day?  If we can't stop the bomb OUTSIDE the target zone, you can't stop the carnage inside.

 Everytime you go through security at the airport , and you take your shoes off and your belt and the rest of the hassle, that your subjected too, don't you ever wonder,just who is winning the war on terror? Well I gotta tell you, if its based on who's life has changed more, us or them, its us, if Al-Queda's objective was to take away or limit our constitional rights, with the help of BUSH and his failed PATRIOT ACT-they have done a spectacular job- now before you argue, please consider this- before 9/11- was the government able to tap your phones without a warrant, were they able to label someone a terroist and then detain them indefintly-so if the questions is who's winning?-its them!- time for a new direction.
Chris from Philadelphia, when you get shot or blown up by someone who wants to do something to your plane then maybe you'll think about changing your mind. If you don't want something like this to happen then you might wanna change your mind right now and suck up your "my rights" attitude.
People will be happy to trade freedom for security.  This system, or one like it, will be in service around the country as fast as budgets can be rewritten to cover the costs.  

In time, every police department will have them, and then most shopping malls.  Seeing through clothes will virtually eliminate shoplifting.  
Oh no, somebody is acting strange!  They must be a criminal, which means we can violate their rights with impunity!
Keri: So you solution is to let them blow up our planes and kill us??!!  Are you so selfish as to say that your right to privacy is more important than people's lives??!! Sounds like the kind of idiotic statement the ACLU would make. I personally don't like the the inconvenience of security check points at airports, and am not a fan of being subjected to an X-Ray with or without my knowledge, but unlike you, I value human life enough to endure these things because it is for the greater good of saving people's lives.  You clearly have no idea how many weapons and explosives have been confiscated due to our security tactics.  EVEN IF IT JUST SAVES 1 LIFE... ISN'T IT WORTH IT??!
I'm still waiting for the TSA to implement the one thing that might have stopped the 9-11 terrorists.  When are they going to require people here on long term Visas to check in (like US Citizen parolees) and track down and deport those who do not?

I guess that wouldn't require Billions of $$ and employ lots of people.  I hope we win the war on terror as quickly as we did the war on drugs...what's the total spent on that 'war'?
To Alex in CA, your body is already at 100 (98.6) so your hot steak idea is stupid plus you don't understand how this machine works anyway.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=928225

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.