ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Secular Pakistani wins Taliban support

Posted: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 1:10 PM
Filed Under:


PESHAWAR, Pakistan – "I am not Taliban," Kamran Khan told me. He could not have been more emphatic. "I am not a fundamentalist, I am not a terrorist, I am not an extremist," he said with a seriousness that belies his years.

The 25-year-old Khan is the newly elected parliamentary representative from North Waziristan – the area believed to be the command and control center of al-Qaida along the remote and rugged Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

Just last month a U.S. military strike on a safe house in the area killed one of Osama bin Laden’s top commanders, Abu Laith al Libi. The house was being used as a training camp to plan attacks on U.S. forces across the border in Afghanistan.

Image: Kamran Khan
VIDEO: Kamran Khan discusses his victory in the recent Pakistan elections

According to Khan, only one percent of the local population supports the militants. The local people are fed up with the violence, the beheadings, and the daily fear. They want to live in peace, he said. They want to see an improvement in their lives.

But the reality is much more complex. The Northwest Frontier and the tribal areas are polarized. On one side are the new young  leaders like Khan, who want to bring an end to the violence, and on the other are the hard line militants who want to establish an orthodox Islamic state inside Pakistan.

A secular moderate supported by Taliban
In Pakistan’s Feb. 18 parliamentary elections, Khan ran as a secular candidate on an independent ticket – and won.

He defeated his opponent – a hard-line religious cleric – in a region where the Islamic militants hold sway, by calling for change. And even more surprising, the Taliban supported Khan.

 "My first priority in the parliament is development," said Khan. "We have no hospitals, no roads, no drinking water." He also said he wants to tackle issues like the inequality of women. "There is no education," he said. "I want our women to be educated. They should become doctors and teachers."

With such an ambitious social program, I said that it sounded like he was calling for a rebellion.

His response was that, "Militancy will go away with jobs."

Khan termed the $750 million development grant for the tribal areas that the U.S. has promised as too small an amount to win over the tribes in the war on terror.

He explained that the tribal areas have essentially been left alone for 60 years, since the end of the British Empire on the Indian sub-continent, and that people are desperate for change and progress. "The people are angry," said Khan. "The rest of the world has moved forward, [but] we still live with no electricity and our women walk for long miles carrying water on their heads." Khan explained that like it or not, people take help from whoever is offering it, "so they turn to the militants and they turn to the clerics."

Taliban help get out the vote
In the days before the recent parliamentary election the local Taliban militants urged people to come out and vote. Armed with their AK-47’s the militants patrolled the streets and provided protection at campaign rallies for each of the candidates. The Frontier Corp, the government’s paramilitary force stationed in North Waziristan, kept a distance.

On Election Day, groups of Taliban, armed to the teeth with AK-47's, sat outside each polling station drinking tea – they were there to insure the vote went off as planned.  The Taliban promised the people that the elections would be fair, free and peaceful – and they were.

"Look," Khan tried to explain this latest phenomenon. "You Americans can’t understand that the local Taliban are not foreigners. They belong to the people, they belong to the society, and they belong to our tribes. You cannot keep bombing them – you cannot keep killing them," he said. "This is a wrong policy of America."

And that’s why Khan’s story is so compelling.

Camera-ready
We met in Peshawar, the dusty capital of the Northwest Frontier Province – just 200 miles from North Waziristan. These days Khan shuttles back and forth between his tribal home and the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, often stopping over in Peshawar. He is a man on a mission.

He walked into the room where I was waiting for him, smiled broadly and shook my hand. (Now I was sure he wasn’t Taliban – the hard-line Islamists don’t shake women’s hands.)  We sat on the floor covered by a large red central Asian carpet. Sodas, sweets and tea were served.

Then Khan quickly got up and disappeared. He came back wearing the elegant black and white stripped turban of his tribe. He was ready for the TV camera.

"Negotiations with the people, with the Taliban [are] the solution of the problems." And that’s the message Khan is taking to the new government leaders in Islamabad.

Khan says the tribes are angry with the policies of America. "America knows no other way but to use force," he said. But he wants people to know that the inhabitants of the tribal region are not one monolithic group.

Complex region
North Waziristan is the largest of the seven federally administered tribal areas along the Pakistan Afghanistan border. The two main Pashtun tribes, the Wazirs and the Mehsuds inhabit the area. They are constantly feuding with each other; that is until it comes time to unite to expel the foreigners.

In his book "The Pathans" (another name for Pashtuns), the British foreign service officer, Sir Olaf Caroe explained the difference between the tribes.

"The nearest I can get to it," Caroe wrote in his book, "is to liken the Mehsud to the wolf and the Wazir to a panther. Both are splendid creatures; the panther is slier, sleeker and has more grace. The wolf pack is more purposeful, more united and more dangerous."

Khan is a Wazir. He is from a prominent family, educated and the son of a doctor.

His arch rival is the wanted terrorist Baitullah Mehsud, the self proclaimed leader of a united Pakistani Taliban from the Mehsud tribe. Mehsud has claimed responsibility for the many recent suicide bombings wracking Pakistan. The CIA has ample proof that Mehsud was involved in the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto last December.  Khan doesn’t recognize Mehsud as any leader.

"We have nothing to do with him," he said.

And now the Pakistani army with the help of U.S. intelligence is planning a major operation to go in and get Mehsud.

On that, no comment from Khan.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I think usa should keep helping these area so we can have people like khan. Even their own people like to change their life. This is the only way we can kill millitancy.
I totally agree with Mr. Khan.  The US administration should help build schools, hospitals and roads in the Northern Pakistan.  Education is the only way terrorism can be countered and neutralized.  Instead of giving billions of dollars to the Pakistani military, the we should be funding the basic needs of the people through NGO!  
Great blog Carol, for those of us who just have superficial knowledge of the area and situation, this blog offers an excellent insight. It’s good to see some alternate view and Mr. Khan raised some legitimate concerns. I hope our policy focus on a long term solution that involve aid and relief for tribal people and people of Pakistan in general not just Pakistan government.

Keep up the good work
This is a brilliant article.  I've been waiting for an article in the mainstream press that didn't demonize the people of Afghanistan/Pakistan.  So much money is spent on weapons and bombing, yet so little on education and essentials such as clean drinking water.  These so called radicals, have been radicalized by years of war and years of being used by countries such as the Soviet Union and United States.  Al qaeda is a political organization, yes they are radical, but they were radicalized as a consequence of U.S. foreign policy and the oppressive Soviet Union.  

An excellent book to read is "Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to Promote Peace...One School at a Time"  It is a true story of a man who got lost climbing K2 in the mountains of Pakistan.  He was rescued by villagers in so-called al-qaeda territory.  When he asked the villagers what he could do to re-pay them for saving his life, the only thing they wanted was a school for their children to be educated at.  

Americans need to ask themselves, what would it feel like if their roles were were reversed?  Well, if it was the situation many Pakistani's find themselves in:  "The rest of the world has moved forward, [but] we still live with no electricity and our women walk for long miles carrying water on their heads." Khan explained that like it or not, people take help from whoever is offering it, "so they turn to the militants and they turn to the clerics."....then it is not suprising how they have responded.  Why allow extremists to win the propaganda war and provide for them?  The war needs to be focused on winning hearts and minds, not bombing the villages until no citizens are left alive.  Terrorism will only spread this way.  
They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.  This is one good example.  I have to say that the more work that people have; the less likely that they will be stirred to fight governments and be radicalized.  
The Taliban helped get out the vote ? And Khan won ? Hmmmm. And a $750 million development grant from the US is not enough ??  What possible GUARANTEES can they give us that the money won't just end up in hands of the Taliban anyway ? And if the US has even half of a brain, they will offer grant money in installments, and only give the money when pre-determined goals with obvious, proven results have been met.
Take a good look at Mr.Khan, he will be another victim when the extremists come to the conclusion he is has too much influence and commmon sense. A brave man no doubt, but it's hard to open a dialog with primitive animals. I hope he makes progress.
Mr. Khan makes some good points, and it would serve
the American government to learn more about the people in his area. We don't even send people there who speak the language or know the history of the different tribes...just soldiers with guns who have a very slanted view of why they are there. The killer of my brother will not be my friend. Maybe  some good solid economic aid (and alot of it) would go a long way in making friends and help create stability. They have the same dreams as we in the West have for the familys and their future.
So when exactly is this guy going to be assassinated by the militants he defends?  Totally inevitable and predictable....but i wish him luck. He needs it.
And in a related story, Bush endorses McCain.
barack obama is right person for problems like this and around the world !
Val, and who did you expect him to endorse? Totally unrelated.
A good insightful article. I would however like to see some other nations involved in the upgrading of these peoples lives. I just cannot imagine living like that day in and day out.
Good potential leader like Khan is needed to heal the chaotic situation. But the question is, "will the militants & the Muslim world would be pleased with his radical plans?" I support your good plan Mr Khan & I wish you good luck for trying.
America has a problem with its own militancy fueled by the religious-military-corporate complex. As long as war is profitable, America will always find enemies to fight.
I enjoyed the article I hope that it is true but I see what is going on in Afghanistan where many nations are trying to do exactly that and yet the Taliban are still using suicide bombers, roadside bombs to stop any of this progress that Mr Khan speaks about. I welcome anyway that we as Americans can help achieve the objectives Mr Khan exemplifies without furthering the militancy that we see or hear about.  
Good potential leader like Khan is needed to heal the chaotic situation. But the question is, "will the militants & the Muslim world would be pleased with his radical plans?" I support your good plan Mr Khan & I wish you good luck for trying.
Build Schools, Libraries, roads!?!?  You appeasment morons never stop.  The Taliban savages don't negotiate, they decapitate, they shoot women in the head for teaching school, use children in suicide bombings and other unspeakable horrors.  You are the Hitler apologists of the 1930's, which makes you more dangerous than the Taliban itself.
This article and most of your comments are very touching but extremely naive.  

Why do we continue to implying that the United States is the root of all evil?  Why is it our responsibility to feed the world and develop their economies?  How have we "used" these people in the past?

The US contributes more aid than the rest of the developed nations of the world combined but somehow it is our fault that these people have allowed terrorism to permeate their populace.

Rather than extorting us for aid, Mr. Khan should recognize that if his people allow extremists into their midst who choose to wage war against the west, they can expect violent consequences.

The world is a dangerous place.  It is made that much more so by the narrow-minded, america-hating, pacifists of the world.
Afghanistan Taliban, Pakistan Taliban.  Good guy Taliban, bad guy Taliban.  The gentle Al-Qaeda that was until it was "radicalized" by U.S. Foreign Policy. I am sure if there is any nuance to all of this, the CIA did not need to read this blog to know it.
Now Bush endorse McCain and if McCain wins then he will invade Iran with over a trillion dollars, and then there will have 4 countries with full of terrorists, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. I wish atleast this time we chose a better president sigh.
Yes the flower turns to the sun and people of need turn to the side where help may be. US policy should be more about conquering hunger in these areas than bombing them in the hope of extinction. This is not what America was all about. What a waste of such profound past.
Readers K. and Jack Benton are the realists here.

Isn't it funny that any Muslim who calls himself moderate, first wants American money to help his people but never misses to blame USA for all their problems. Second, they are NEVER satisfied and NEVER GRATEFUL.
Having said that, Mr. Khan seems to be a good man and I hope he is not playing games. He now has a duty to his people to convince them that all this violence, murders,behaeading and stoning to death which these Mullahs and Taliban have done and supported is against humanity. They are the barbarians, the beasts and not the rest of the world. Convince them to stop hating people of other religion.
The US must help people like him and help the people of North Waziristan and the whole NWFA (North West Frontier Agency) people with aid BUT only in measured way ensuring that the Americans are directly dealing with the NWFA people in doling out the dollars and have the final say so in what projects would be supported and how. Do not give a single cent to the MOST CORRUPT PAKISTANI AUTHORITIES who would sell their grand mother for ten dollars.
If we can do that, I am all for it. If not, let them face their own future. It is they who have made their bed, let them lie in it.
Let us not be stupid, leave the money, walk away and let it go in to Taliban's hands and help them attack us with the help of the money we gave them. That, unfortunately is the record so far.
We would all like to see it stop....But trust is earned.......
With the majority of Pakistan's population under the age of 26 (100 Million of 160 Million), it's a nation which we have to keep a close eye on and strengthen relations with through civilian institutions.

Kamran Khan is the future of Pakistan.  He is among the youngest Parliamentarians which is important in having a young voice in the Parliament from the FATA region.  I admire this man's courage and the reporter's courage for being in that region that even a few Pakistani journalists avoid.  

Kamran Khan shows that there is an opportunity for change, and that Taliban can be marginalized and that secular parties can win in a region considered the hotbed for religious fundamentalism.  

The lack of jobs, opportunities and options are exactly what fuels militancy. when a parent cant feed their children etc... nothing makes people angrier. Help improve infrastructure, increase commerce, improve education and people will become occupied in these endeavors. most importantly: the people have to do it themselves. Anything else is seen as a paternalistic push for foreign dominance. It is the same with this as anything else. Starvation be it physical or intellectual breeds violence. Violence begets violence....homegrown solutions beget the same.
If this is the change Khan wants in Pakistan, then I totally agree with him. Islam by force is against the religion itself. But forward thinking and education will get rid of the Taliban without killing. The answer is get rid of the root of the problem: kill the ignorance not the ignorant people.

Killing people because they belong to the Taliban doesn't work. Education does work. People will get some common sense.
well, everything looks good to read, but in reality its different.i will believe if khan is saying he is not with taliban or terrorist, but then taliban supporting with the elections, thats a question mark.why do big pharmacetucial company's or other big oil companies here lobby or support or fund senate memebers.Well people from the tribes are very pasisonate about their pride, the most important they hate is not being loyal. And i kinda believe thats where all the taliban has originated from, when US took the help of taliban to fight russians.At that time it was hatered towards us for leaving them and that grew into a more poilitical thing using religion as a tool to provoke people.I am sure the common people have realised that they are the victims, but realising wont help them. They have to find a way to stand upto the AK47's than bend their heads fearing AK47's.
Good luck Mr.Kahn, may I suggest to you that you spend some money on a fully armored vehicle,some good bodyguards, full body armor, a shotgun with slugs for those up close supporters with backpacks that want to shake your hand and get your family out of the country as soon as possible so your enimies can't capture them and change the way you think.
    And build a compound with some well maintained tanks outside,4 or 5 at least!  Then after all that on the day that you decide to negotiate with the taliban, fake an illness and have one of your 12 doubles stand in for you. The next time you tavel to pakistan get one of those cheap brass neclaces, about 12 inches tall and about a full inch thick. Oh, I almost forgot, you'll need the 10TH Mountain Divison on speed dial. Other than that I think you'll be alright, on second thought just use one of those tanks as a personal vehicle. Good luck Mr. Kahn, I'd shake your hand but, I gotta go !!!!!!!
Excellent article. America alone ultimately can't stop the extremists...particularly by trying to kill them off. The point is to turn the "silent majority" of the local people against the extremists, by (yes Jack, exactly) building schools, roads, infrastructure...i.e. helping these people escape the terrible poverty they live with. Then they will get rid of the extremists themselves...
So!  The Taliban have a red carpet from China! In a country where their largest export is carpets.  
What else is the Taliban supporting in China and the asias?
As a Pakistani Muslim, I'm saying confidently that this is the way to defeat extremism.  To those of you who are shocked with the Taliban's support of his vote, I'm not suprised. Everyone there, Taliban or non-Taliban, wants development and education. You need these few things and the extremism will slowly go down. At the same time you have to promote a moderate Islam. Diplomacy and attacking the root of problems it the way to defeat extremism -- not military. No matter how strong a military, those militans can keep you running after them through valleys and mountain passes for a hundred years. And you'll have accomplished little. As a U.S. citizen, I'm hoping our next president will use some more intelligent diplomacy and problem solving -- not just guns.
  It's refreshing that there is an elected official in that part of the world who is at least open to talking. Our government thinks we are somehow helping the situations there without ever taking the time to ask them what might be helpful. Sane people willing too talk and negotiate can reach win-win solutions to problems. We seem to be more focused on achieving win-lose solutions.

  We have promised $750 million in aid to these tribal areas of Pakistan that on the surface sounds like a lot of money but in reality it's about 3 days worth of costs for the war in Iraq. I'm guessing the budget for several months of Predator flights over their region is higher than that. Imagine how it must be living with the possibility that you or your neighbors home could be destroyed in a brief instant with no warning. You wouldn't have too much appreciation for the people responsible for that evidenced by the words "made in the USA" on the remaining shrapnel. Seems like it would be better for people to see "made in the USA" on machinery used to build roads or drill wells or boxes of food and consumer goods.

  If you take a little time to just consider the amount of money we have spent on war in the last 6 years and what we have got for that, anyone with half a brain would conclude that it was a bad investment. If we had been dropping food and US made consumer goods and machinery to bring improvement to these people's lives, they would have a different view of us as a nation. We would also have a booming economy supplying all that for the aid. Yeah, it is still possible that some of those people would be ungrateful but the alternative of killing their family and neighbors pretty much assures they will never be grateful. Try to devise a plan to make people hateful and it probably doesn't look a lot different than what we have been doing. Just think about the hatred that 911 inspired in this country. Yes it was horrific and I believe we had a right to seek vengeance against those responsible. Now think about the horrific death and destruction in Iraq that they now see us as responsible for. The real irony here is that Iraq wasn't even a small player in 911. Now we have instilled untold hatred in millions of people across the Middle East who not long ago could have cared less about us. We could have made them our friends instead of enemies.

  Clearly the Taliban can at least be linked to Al Qaeda and 911 as they supported and sheltered them. Now you have an official in the birthplace of that movement who is willing to work with us. We should at least welcome that as an opening. The fact that the Taliban was at least somewhat supportive of him suggests that maybe they would turn against Al Qaeda in the interest of their own survival. They know there is little chance that we would even consider negotiating with them directly but it would appear they may be willing to deal with a secular surrogate. The simple fact that they have not killed him is a positive note.

 I believe the vast majority of the people there just want to live peaceful lives albeit different than our own. We should at least see this as a "crack in the door" we can use to communicate through and not just knock it down.
It's not an either/or proposition: force or aid.  Our involvement in Pakistan is limited by the sovereign government of Pakistan itself!  American military leaders have long known that it takes more than tanks, planes and soldiers to win the peace.  Unfortunately, the civilian leadership of the military opted to use the military component to the exclusion of diplomatic, information and economic means.  Even so, ever since the US and NATO have been in Afghanistan, the Provincial Reconstruction Teams have worked at building that essential infrastructure that will bring long term stability (schools, hospitals, dams and roads, etc.).  But, we never see this work in the media.  Only ignorant marines (allegedly) abusing a puppy.
Totally ridiculous article. Do you really believe the Taliban will create such a free society ? Have you people forgotten what monsters these people are ? Do you need pictures to remind you morons ? Don't shave your beard in the morning and you will find yourself hanged to death, left there for three days to remind others. The Taliban has assasinated many rising leaders just like Mr. Khan and their families too. He is a dead man walking as soon as the CIA contacts him. Pakistani Intelligence thought the Taliban would be the ideal leadership group for Afghanistan until they themselves found out how crazy these guys are. Now that they can't control them any longer they just try to keep them in that border region to appease them and keep them away from the large cities in Pakistan. It's the same thing the Saudis do with there radical factions so that they won't threaten the Royal family. Wake up people and NEVER forget 9/11.
I suppose most of the well to do countries of the world will leave this for the US, as usual.  God bless the few that have helped us with anything.  

Here again, I can compare it to the World Wars...after the first, with Germany left in despair and upheaval, they rebuilt only to start under another dictator, and with another war!  

After the beyond horrible destruction in most of the world from WWII, The Marshall Plan ( named after George Marshall but was largely the creation of State Department officials, especially William L. Clayton and George F. Kennan) was carried out to restore hope, repel Communism.  Peace from Germany since, and of course, they have prospered.

Now, can we carry out aid to these people, without someone's hand in the till, and hope that there will be some sort of contribution by other countries~?  We have to try.  And those we help, have to help themeselves, as well.

And I am not going to forget thanking Mr. Khan and praying for his dreams for his people to come well within his lifetime.
Theossa. I completely agree with you. I am now reading 3 cups of tea! What a great american who is collecting funds to built schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan to educate the kids. Eduation will bring peace, not war!
Bush and his neo cons are such imbeciles!! ignorant and arrogant too!
The Taliban are already marginalized, these people who commit atrocities on their own people need to be wiped off the face of the earth.  
My previous post was meant for M.Laraby.  I totally agree with you! 3 cups of tea, great true story.

Don't kill us, we won't kill you.  It is a very simple solution to the world's problems.  

Now that being settled, it may surprise you to know that living in an area where there are no jobs, agriculture or businesses is not conducive to having a future.  If there is nothing there to build on, you will have to go somewhere else to live.  If you choose to stay where there are no jobs or raw materials to work with, be prepared to live in poverty.
Just don't blame me for your problems.  Those of us in America that lived in poverty, pulled ourselves up by our boot laces and took one step at a time to better ourselves.   You can too.
This is a joke, these people live in a marginalized land that cannot support them.  They are impovrished because they have large families in a land with few resources and not because of anything America or the world did.  Until people realize that have large families and high birth rates are what is really impovrishing them, all the money in the world won't help much.  The so called Religous leaders encouraging large familes are doing for their own selfish purposes.
How sad David Graham in Austin, TX sees these people as "primitive animals" and Jack Benton in Atlanta thinks your article is about appeasement.  How unfortunate, he has not developed the ability to see the humanity in others.  How can you not believe that a person would not want a better life for his people.  Would you want your wife, sister, mother or daughter walking miles for water?  There is so much good America could do in the world.  War is not always the answer.  There is so much good America could do in the world, but then we would not be taking care of the shareholders benefitting from the war.
How sad David Graham in Austin, TX sees these people as "primitive animals" and Jack Benton in Atlanta thinks your article is about appeasement.  How unfortunate, he has not developed the ability to see the humanity in others.  How can you not believe that a person would not want a better life for his people.  Would you want your wife, sister, mother or daughter walking miles for water?  There is so much good America could do in the world.  War is not always the answer.  There is so much good America could do in the world, but then we would not be taking care of the shareholders benefitting from the war.
Mr. Khan seems to be a good man and to want the best for the North Pakistani people, but anything involving situations like this needs to be taken with a grain of salt.  US money needs to be carefully administered so it does not just end up in the hands of the Taliban.
So, the lack of jobs and opportunity fuels militancy---and yet, many of those in militant groups--including those in the planes that hit the Twin Towers---are educated and financially secure. And in order to address these deficits, we are supposed to:
1. Give more money---after all, that's why Nigeria and other countries like them are now educated, developed and secure: all the foreign aid that they invested so wisely
2. They will spend the money wisely and honestly---like the PLO, who never built a single hospital or school and yet blamed the west for all their ills
(Mrs. Arafat's home in Paris is quite lovely, I hear)
3. The Taliban, having kept women out of school, nonIslamic books out of the last country they ruined, and the Afghan populace in squalor, will now turn around and build universities and shopping malls for every gal in town! Or, not.
Remind me to never allow any candidate with this lunkheaded, 'Berkeleyspeak' worldview to attract my vote.  I'll stick with the mindless, militaristic, narrow approach we have, thanks. So far, it's better in Iraq than anything you geniuses on the left have devised.
Jack, Jack..typical war mongering jerk....killing is the only way to solve the problems..as long as YOU and your kids don't have to go.  Has ANY of the "war on Terror" worked?  Any?  Hmmmm?  Well, maybe, what we used before, that appeasement - helping with money and technology instead of killing them with money and technology might owrk...you can buy lots of schools, teachers and food with a BILLION DOLLARS A DAY which is what we spend making new enemies in Iraq, each and every day.  YOU ARE MONGERS ARE ALL THE SAME
Someone who can order airstrikes needs to understand the area and its people first. The use of force has an opposite effect on the Pukhtuns..especially the tribals. It unites them when they are attacked from the outside. Pukhtuns are good hospitable people. Give them education and you'll be amazed by the results. Even in Pakistan they are slowly gaining a foothold in the civil service and other important positions. The change in these areas cannot be brought from outside. It would come from within once the resources are allocated for the development of infrastructure in the area. Don't trust the corrupt army or the likes of Zardari to disburse these funds. Empower the locals like Mr. Khan and we will see results. They have a very strong accountability system in place for centuries. You steal from the community and they burn your house, throw you and your family out of the tribe plus you have to pay a fine. Brutal or primitive it might seem but it works. Lets not try to introduce antibiotics when local remedies are best suited.
this shows that even the Tailban can put on a suit and speak to dumb western reporters if there is $750 million to be put in their war chest. But of course this is not enought for their war needs. Take heart they are learning how to use the media to their own advantage.
WRONG, Sean.  Except for military stuff, the US contributes 1 or 2% of its national budget to foreign aid--proportionately less than any other developed nation.  And the CIA has meddled in other nations' affairs for the benefit of corporate "campaign contributors" for decades, from Iran to Chile and back.  There's a reason why the ayatollahs call us "the great Satan"; it's called the Arab-American Oil Company.  For their benefit we overthrew a democratically elected government and installed the Shah and his monstrous SAVAK secret police.

I wonder why the people Bobby Burns called "the unco' guid" can never remember: "Who sows the wind, shall reap the whirlwind."  Earth to Far Right: Getting the
kiddies to the soccer games is not worth going to war for fuel for big guzzling SUVs.
Another book that everyone should read is: A Man to Match his Mountains. The story of Badshah Khan, nonviolent Soldier of Islam by Eknath Easwaran
ISBN 0-915132-34-6
Really bad the world we live in and there is nothing we can do. Some people make money with wars. The US Government approved 9/11. Too may things don't add up. The second plane hit the WTC 20 minutes after the first. The mighty US Air Force cannot intercept...gimme a break. Now my dear Muslims we in the West cannot trust you I mean after all Bin Laden was created by the CIA when we helped OBL to kick out the Soviet Union from their holy Afghanistan.
How dare he accepted help from the US when he hates our way of life that much. He will pay for his actions sooner or later. I am proud to be living in the western hemisphere. Muslims pray too much and yes must bend toward a certain direction Mecca. I think they would earn much more respect when they accept other religions. I think it's arrogant of OBL to demand that we all convert to Islam. Islam would be my last choice of religion. It's simply too much time they spend on praying. Relegions are man made and how dare some humans claim to be God. Does anybody notice that OBL is in hiding. I say real men don't hide but face their enemy. So terrorists are actively working to have access to Atom technology. They would certainly make headlines when they hit a US city with an A Bomb but why would they do this? They know what the consequence is! The far eastern countries would get the same back from the superpowers. Nobody wins an Atomic war. Not even OBL. I mean the US warheads alone could wipe out the planet Earth. PS. All the best to Mr. Khan...but I don't trust him! Do You?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=733456

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.