ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



In Russia, Time magazine leaves them breathless

Posted: Thursday, December 20, 2007 10:58 AM
Filed Under:

MOSCOW – The phone rang. It was a frantic call from a colleague who works at NTV, one of Russia’s major television stations.

"Is there any way we can watch the ‘Today’ show here in Moscow?" she asked me. "We heard they will be announcing Time magazine’s Person of the Year, and we want to be watching in case they choose President Putin."

I couldn’t help her with the ‘Today’ show, but otherwise she wasn’t disappointed. Time did chose President Vladimir Putin as their Person of the Year, citing as a major factor his efforts to bring Russia "roaring back to the table of world power."

VIDEO: Putin is named TIME person of the Year

Along with the two other largest television networks in Russia (all three are run by the Kremlin or Kremlin-friendly companies), NTV had a story which would earn Putin even more airtime than the ample amount he usually gets: an American magazine chooses Russia’s president at its Person of the Year, at a time when tensions between the countries are on the rise over disputes about the political direction that Russia is taking.

'For better or worse'
The United States and much of Europe have criticized what they see as a democratic backslide in Russia, even calling parliamentary elections held earlier this month neither free nor fair. Putin, on the other hand, made a central theme of the election the need to protect Russia from the outside influence of other countries that wish to destabilize her – a not-so-veiled swipe at the West.

Time’s choice of Putin was played out on the major networks here as a nod of support for Putin’s style of leadership. All the networks dedicated between 5 and 10 minutes of their evening newscast to the story, showing long clips of Putin answering Time reporters’ questions. This morning, the "Tvoi Den" tabloid headline declared that "Americans Chose Putin: Bush no longer rates with the Americans."

Time stresses that their choice for Person of the Year is not an endorsement of that person’s views or policies, but simply the person who "for better or for worse has most influenced world events" (previous choices include Hitler, Stalin, Pope John Paul II and Bill Gates).

Bloggers beg to differ…
But that still didn’t sit well with some of Russia’s blog community, who tend to be younger and more critical of the government. They point to the comments of Richard Stengel, Time’s managing editor, who said Putin was chosen for the "extraordinary feat of leadership in taking a country that was in chaos and bringing it stability."

One LiveJournal blog poster wrote: "I don't think that Russian government actually paid you for this. But it does look like this year you had a really hard time selecting worthy candidates."

For Putin himself, the choice is just another confirmation of what he already believes. After the chaos of the ’90s, Russia is back on its feet and back on the map.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I am  not  against  Wladimir Putin  being  honored,  but he  is  now  obligated  to  explain  why  Chechnya is being  martirized by Russia  and  why so  many  poisonings  and  killing  of  journalists  are  happening  under  his  wacth.
Putin is p.... off because russia lost so many of its former republiks and he likes to get Russia back to the totalitarian  state like it was 20 years ago he is acommunist he was a commmunist and will allways be a communist period.What you expect from a former KGP colonel.
dit you ever noticed he never looks any body straight in the eyes
Clearly, in my opinion, Putin's selection was based upon Time's criteria...for better or worse, which individual has impacted the world the most this year.

Putin has restored elements that are core features of Russian history: the rule of the strong man and discipline in society by government-controlled institutions. The Russian people are comfortable with this, trading stability, comfort, and security for certain freedoms taken for granted in the West. These elements have brought Russia back and Putin is to be credited with making Russians proud again. And he has turned Russia into a player on the international scene again, rather than the Yeltsin-era laughingstock.

With their ample natural resources, intelligent and trained wokforce, and long-term outlook, Russia is positioning herself in a way that Americans can be envious of...other than the restrictions on personal freedom that the Russian people are more comfortable with than we are.
you know I find this terribly funny, if it wasnt so TWO FACED of the liberals.....ahhh, alas you've done it again!

You sit around and BASH Pres. Bush for doing the SAME TYPE of things you give Putin "Man of the Year" for. Wow, if we waterboard 2 KNOWN terrorist that helped perpetrate the attacks on 911 for 30 minutes we are EVIL, yet, everyone in the world with HALF a brain realizes that the 15 INNOCENT CIVILIAN journalist in Russia that have "mysteriously died of un-natural causes" such as "jumping" from a 15 story building were ALL perpetrated by Putin and his cronies, just like the Alexander Litvinenko case in Britain...he was poisoned by the Kremlin, killed in a DIFFERENT SOVERIGN NATION (Britain) and you give him Man of the Year?!??!?

God help me have the undying patience it takes to understand the lib media.
Time Magazine is desperate for attention! What better choice than choosing President Putin as
"Person of the Year". Narrow minded for sure!
Time was right in their choice. Putin's political faults notwithstanding, he HAS effectuated substantial change for the better in a backward behemoth nation long noted for its resistance to progress.
Only a ruthless politician could have done it.

"Pootie-Poot" has certainly eclipsed El Maximo Fidel as the world's slickest dictator; and he is tougher than the Russian Mob.

A good man to have as an ally. It would be imprudent to make him an enemy.  
Leave Putins news inside the magazine;  We have plenty of U.S. Citizens, includeing generals, Soldiers and Heroic young children who deserved the front page of Time Magazine.  This why I know go alse where for my world news, that and Time has become to Bias for my taste instead of just giveing facts and the news as they should;
s
Somehow I can't help feling that we are setting up for round 2 of the "Cold War"....
Just another reason to add to the list of reasons I don't read Time Magazine!
I miss the Cold War.  It was so much more palatable than Actual War, which is unpleasantly deadly.  Bring on the propaganda machine!
It has been a tradition for Times to be suspensful and choose a somewhat contraversile Person of the Year.  In the context, Putin is a good choice.  It generates debates, why and how, this I think is positive so people learn about Russia and her changes more.  As an observer of world events, I agree Putin had a lot of guts as a leader, and he did great things for Russia in recent years.
For what it's worth, there is a lesson to be learned here.  Iraq is a country in the same condition as the USSR was before Putin took the reins.  Putin may not be a "nice guy", but a nation in shambles doesn't really need a "nice guy" to put the pieces back together.  Saddam was a tyrant for sure, but he did keep his country together.  Now that we have dismantled the government of Iraq, with no clear plan to reestablish it, I feel strongly that a man of Putin's resources is the only hope the poor citizens of Iraq have.  I really don't believe that a democratic Iraq is a reality.  We can push democracy and our egotistical, materialistic point of view only so far.  What the citizens of Iraq really need (in my opinion)is a government that is concerned about the welfare of it's citizens Shiat, Sunni, all sects - and it's quite obvious that the model we're trying to push on them will not fit the bill.  Our own government is much more interested in invading foreign lands than providing affordable health care to it's own citizens, helping it's people in times of disaster, and improving the living standard of it's people.  Politics, yet again, has gotten in the way of progress.  Yes, Saddam needed to be removed from his position, but not at the astronomical expense burdening the working class folks of the U.S.A.  Our president made a terrible call with the Iraq invasion, and instead of admitting his mistake and taking corrective action, he's compounded the problem by forging ahead at full steam in the darkness with no light to guide the way.  The U.S.A. and Iraq are both desperatly in need of some real leadership - not a tyrannical egomaniac such as our current top dog.  I suspect time is growing very short for the new Rome.  We could all learn a little history and benefit from it.  Rome rose to world domination and declined over a couple of thousand years.  The U.S.A. has done the same thing over the course of a couple hundred years, and folks, we are in the declining phase.  If our citizens continue to allow leaders like Bush to push their agenda's on the world, we will not be a superpower for much longer. We need to focus on the problems at home - then, and only then, once we find solid ground, should we tell others how they should live.  Actually, we shouldn't tell anyone how to live.  At our inception, we were a model and example of freedom and loved by the world at large.  Now, due to our continued global bullying, we are the most hated group of people since the Nazi machine was in full swing.  People, please open your eyes and see where we are headed!
Any adverse blog to your opinion should be heard, otherwise it is UNfair and UNbalanced. I simply was seeing if my opinion of Time was a credit or unfair;
by refuseing to show adversal blog to your opinions or facts or actions , you than bear out a unfavorable review;
This man scares me and I fear there is NOTHING that he is not capable of doing.  I feel TIME just added fuel to his fire - none of us needed that!
Russians are clueless.  Putin has brought them minor prosperity in exchange for their soul.  Very sad.  It coulda been a lot better.
well hitler and stalin was also man of the year in the 1930's ...I wouldnt be surprised....
With Iran cancelled and Iraq going into paralysis, and Afghanistan too small, the arms merchants need a big arms buildup, and a new cold war is just the ticket.

That's why the Time editors made much of "Putin's angry mood with the administration" (their words). Recycling works with fear, too, and rousing up the old atheist communist devils is easy, since they're sleeping near the surface of our consciousness, half-awake from the subprime liquidity fiasco.

It's about profit, status and the ways to prove them.
Time should call it "Newsmaker of the Year."  "Person of the Year" has a positive connotation notwithstanding Time's disclaimer.  As the reaction in Russia points out, Time has provided an endorsement to a person who is leading Russia back into the cold war and a totalitarian society.
The selection is a disgrace
Putin is just another Stalin in the making
Having recently returned from a two week trip to Russia, I am convinced that whatever limitations are in effect under Putin's leadership, the country, as a whole is much,much better off than prior to the Putin administration.  American Democracy has many, many limitations and it less than perfect but we support it.  The Russian people support the dramatic reforms they have been privileged to have under Putin.  Let's recognize good things that happen regardless of the form of government a country may practice.

The Russian psyche is well-served by Vladimir Putin. Who else but a former KGB officer is better to lead this still backward and stoic nation back to its failed past. Russia yet remains a vast land in bondage by its own dictatorial government. If the Russian people accept the terms, then they will have what they deserve: slavery. As long as they mind their own business and stop meddling into destabilizing the free world, why should we care?

I like the choice. Putin did turn things around for that country and should be commended for it. The thing that doesn't sit well with us Americans is that there, you can be elected into a high profile job without receiving a majority vote. The question is, will Puttin be the Prime Minister, doing the job of the President.
Disgusting. Putin is a meglomanic. He has had reports killed, etc...
The obvious choice was Al Gore. He has done more to save human kind from destroying our planet than anyone this year, therefore he has had the greatest impact. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for goodness sake. I guess TIME feels they know more than the Nobel commitee.
My following comments are not an indication of support or opposition to anybody mentioned. It is an intellectual comment.

I am not criticizing the Time's decision. But I am curious about the objectivity of the decision-making process by Time regarding their person of the year.

Granted Putin has attracted a lot of attention. But has he influenced world events more that Bin Laden for example? The latter has changed our whole lives and psyche. Why was he not been named so far? Or did I miss out on something? Is Time trying to make a point to some governments who are criticizing Putin?

It would be very interesting for Time to explain the criteria for their choice, because a choice can be misrepresented as an endorsement of a persons actions. So far I do not think that they may be interested in that... Does journalism have this freedom?


Putin took back control of his country's resources from the oligarchs whom were makeing deals with foreign investors for control of Russia's oil wealth.
He has used these profits for the benefit of ALL Russians...AND created order from chaos.  His country trusts that he has the interest of ALL Russia's people at heart. hmmmmm...not a bad idea.(are you listening "W".)
Will the Russians ever learn?  500 years of Tsars, 75 years of communists...yet another dictator that will grow more corrupt with power, paranoia, and repression.  This will lead to a "people's revolution" in about 10 years, and they'll start all over again.

Pity.  The Russians are born to suffer.
What do you think they should have named George W.? Doesn't ANYONE get it? Time was right on target. For better for worse he was the most influential man of 2007. Not Al Gore, not Brad Pitt and not a former chess champion in Russia. Putin has done quite the mighty job of stabilizing the nuclear arsenal, maintaining relations with the US and Europe without kissing there asses and bringing the people of Russia together with a new economy that rivals even China, Japan, and the USA.
I wonder if any among the multitude of Russian news coverages mentioned the fact that both Hitler and Stalin were accorded the same "fame"?  I do agree with the selection.  
Wow, this is very impressive. Let's see, if Time had been doing the Person of the Year in 1938, I wonder if they would have chosen a guy named Adolph for the title? Watch Putin, he will go down in history for more than Time's Man of the Year... and it won't be for his kindness and humanity.
 
Time magazine continues to dishonor its fourth-estate responsibilities, and its readers, including other media desperate for material, continue to support the practice. The magazine should discontinue the "Person of the Year" silliness for good. The opinion of the editors takes the place of real news, and people spin the editors' fantasies into some kind of correlation with their own, usually without even reading the piece. Why not replace the "Person of the Year" with expanded sports coverage or cartoons? At least Time would then be presenting entertainment as entertainment, a more sensible and ethical practice than trying to pass of self-promotion as journalism.
One family at our church reported that thier older relative went back to visit Russia a few months ago, this person (or his family) had sent food to their relatives)during WWII. One of the most interesting facts he said was that many Russian children were taught (today-now) to speak English. This surprised me! Can anyone else out there confirm this? It would be wonderful if it were true! My hope is that the U.S. always maintains good terms with Russia.
If someone was going to pay me a tribute, it wouldn't mean nothing unless I respected that person's opinion.  Well, Time Magazine is like the New York Times in that regard.  No respect for it as a source of information, no respect for their queer editors and no respect for the liberal slant they place on everything.  Immoral useless rag, is what it is.
I do commened him/them for lowering the countries debt, good job there.  Even though it is attributed to orginized crime.  However, they do need to get their heads out of their butts and take a stand to curb AIDS in their country.  They need to realize the WHO (or anyone else) is not trying to control their population, just the population of AIDS.  But then again this is the mafia and I am sure health issues are not at the top of their list.  
RUSSIA IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED.SHE CONTINUES TO ALLIE HERSELF WITH NATIONS HAVING SECRET AGENDAS CONTRARY TO OUR OWN.
Democracy is the only way to go, but it does have it's own unique problems.  I think Pres Putin in the best interest of his country is trying to avoid some of democracies pitfalls by instituting some of his own personal ideas.  He deserves to be selected as times man of the year.
Da, Comrade Putin!  Da, Comrade Time Magazine!  Da, to all those who ignore the monster at the door!!!

"We will spit in their face, and they will call it dew."  - Nikita Khrushchev
Two of my favorite politicians?  Lech Walenza and Michael Gobachov (sorry about the speling).  Putin's pretty cool too.  These guys try to be honest - something that doesn't seem to count much in American politics.
Commendable choice!  The general USA population might disagree but do they really understand the Russian psyche?  Putin has done much for his motherland and their people.  Do you think they want to be like Americans?  No!  Who wants to be ignorant, selfish, and generally inept?
In response to Nancy's question about Russian children learning English, yes, they are required to take English in their equivalent of high school as well as pass an English proficiency exam before they can graduate from college.  (This comes from my experience of living and working with college students for the past two years in Moscow.)  This isn't really a big deal though, most countries in the world require their children to learn English as it has become the international language of business, trade, and commerce.  And, before we get too cocky about this, please note that it's British English they're learning, not American English.  In fact, most Russian college students know a third and sometimes forth language, besides Russian and English.  

I wish we as Americans were less shocked that the rest of the world is learning English and more outraged and embarrassed that, for all practical purposes, we DO NOT require our children to learn any other language besides English.  (I guess on this one, it's a good thing we have an ocean on each side of us.  Plenty of room for our collective ego!)
An absolute disgrace. From human rights abuses in the Chechen republic and in Russia proper, to turning a blind eye to the AIDS crisis in Russia,poisoning and contract killings of journalists and intimidating political and journalistic opposition, Putin is not to be honored as person of the year. Yes he has made many headlines, but there are many more honorables people who have done good things in the world that were much more worthy of this honor than Russia's next dictator and oppressor.
Just another reason to not buy Time or any Time Warner products. What a disgrace!
Is TIME serious about this? what happened to Paris Hilton and Britney etc. For the last few months TIME read like a celebrity rag. This long suffering subscriber was having second thoughts on re-subscribing.
Thank you for getting back to the real world.
Waa Waa Waa, a bunch of babies that talk talk talk about Global co-operation between countries, but when a foriegn leader is chosen, nobody likes it. The truth is clear, we are on a small planet and what one world leader does, can have a negative or positive effect on all of us. If Putin can stabalize a country in chaos, why not focus on the good and try to influence him to look at humanitarian issues with his people. I think now is the best time to appraoch him on uncomforatble issues.
leah (Sent Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:50 PM) - RIGHT ON!

Yes, Russian children are taught English (my husband is from Russia).  Along with several other languages.  They have been since Communism.  Communism put everyone on equal footing, including the Nazi-persecuted Jews.  I think President Putin is an excellent choice!  He has brought this country back to its feet.  His country loves him.  The young people come out in droves to support him.  Maybe Americans are a bit envious because we have such poor leadership right now.  It seems the U.S. (as a whole) sees itself as the only one that knows anything and has made its duty to make sure everyone else conforms to their way of doing things.  I will be 50 years old in May.  I have learned that almost nothing I was taught about Russia and Communism was true.  This country (U.S.A.) needs an awakening!
It is better to feed red bear than keep him hungry. He kept me for 35 years
vito
I totally agree with Time magazines selection of Vladamir Putin as person of the year. At least the Russian people don't have a moron running their country!
Russian democracy was and is being undermined by a determined group of ex-KGB operatives who believe it is their patriotic duty to restore Russia to her former power and glory regardless of the means deployed.

American democracy was and is being undermined by a determined group of neocons who believe it is their patriotic duty to do whatever is necessary to control the world regardless of the means deployed.
putin is tyrant and a despot. his most troubling act was eliminating the election of govonors. he does seem to be leading his country back to slavery.
In my opinion, this choice was a result of a simple comparison between Bush and Putin.  An intellectual lightweight vs. a cunning and effective leader, whether you like him or not.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=527778

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.