ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Polar bear off the starboard

Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007 8:20 AM
Filed Under:

DAY 3

Onboard Yamal, 2:14am.

I was jostled out of my bunk by the sound of the Yamal colliding with the first pieces of Arctic ice. BAM!

Those early smashes into the ice sound faintly similar to a mortar round exploding in the distance, or for those who’ve never heard the sounds of war, it resembles a percussionists’ kettle drum in the popular children’s musical piece "Peter and the Wolf."

It eventually sounds as if we’re inside the kettle drum, and not only can we hear it, everything on the ship is shaking. 

VIDEO: Crackling ice enroute to the North Pole

NBC cameraman Dmitri Soloyvov and I are sharing a cabin. Initially, he slept through the collisions with ice, but by 2:35 a.m., he was awake.

We have a small porthole, so we could see outside what scientist call "frazzle ice." They’re the small pieces of frozen seawater, some about the size of a large backyard swimming pool, bobbing at the surface. The waves here are no more than two to three feet. Because of the ice in our way, the ships speed has dropped from 19 nautical miles per hour to 15.

Finally, we have arrived to what my imagination believed is the Arctic.

We’re officially at 78 degrees, 52 minutes and 42 seconds North and 40 degrees, 54 minutes, zero seconds East.

There’s ice as I’ve said, and the temperature has dropped, still, on deck, it’s warmer than I expected. Without the wind-chill, temperatures are hovering between 38 and 40 degrees. In the wind, of course, it’s a biting cold that feels well below freezing.

These are typical summer temperatures I’m told, but usually not this early in the season. I wonder if it’s another sign of global warming, but the experts we’re traveling with assure me science doesn’t work that way. You can’t pick a day or so out of the week and make conclusions. Data must be collected for decades to understand trends they say.

Eight hours after we first woke up, we’re now well into an area where most of the surface is covered by ice.

As we’re eating lunch, the intercom system on the ship crackles with word a crewmember on the bridge has spotted a polar bear off the starboard side of the ship.

Courtesy Jan Bryde
A mother polar bear and her two cubs walk across ice near the North Pole.

A mad dash to the deck ensues. The surprise could not be more entertaining. A mother-bear with two cubs is trundling across the ice.

Polar bears taking a stroll
At first they are standoffish, but as our ship comes to a halt, it appears they are as interested in us, as we are in them. They wander toward the ship. One hundred plus passengers and crew, cameras and binoculars at the ready, all focus unblinking attention on the bears.

The trio of carnivores wander towards us: mother-bear leading the two cubs across so-called "first year" ice. It looks like a thin sheen on the surface, but "first year ice," as its name implies, is young ice, actually upwards of four feet thick. Ice that thick is ideally suited to support the weight of polar bears.

VIDEO: Polar bears at play near the North Pole

Polar bears are the top predator in the Arctic region. They’re the largest land based carnivore and scientist say they fear they’re in trouble.

Studies show global warming has reduced the ice cover in the arctic by about two weeks each year. Those are a critical two weeks say biologists. It’s time when bears hunt, mostly ring seals, and store up body fat for the long summer months. Studies have shown in the last 30 years, polar bears are smaller, weigh less, and mothers are giving birth to fewer cubs.

VIDEO: Polar bears in danger

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologists say they fear if the warming trend continues, polar bears could be extinct by the end of the century.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

hello weare based in west vancouver/bc/if your readers go to the web site of port of churchill/there aremany polar bear your operators listed/this area is now open for travelling  nearly annually/yhe arctic ice has""receaded[sp]
Interesting article, but i don't understand how Polar bear numbers are and have been on the increase for the past 20 plus years and yet we are told that they could be all gone by the end of the century???You show us a picture of a mother with two cubs which is a good litter   that look like they are in great shape and report that biologists say "they are smaller and are having fewer cubs"???? Oh by the by four foot thick ice will hold a fully loaded TRACTOR TRAILER (80,000 lbs)  so i imagine it should hold a couple of UNDER WEIGHT BEARS without any problems at all as long as they don't put on any weight. why is this global warming being sold to as so hard??it seems like if we don't buy in before we have time to think we won't buy in at all.If all the people really pushing it did not make a living off it(global warming) it might be easier to take. If we can get off oil i think the rest will fall into place. As for the bears i think it's ALL BULL THEY ARE NOT GOING ANYWHERE ANY TIME SOON.
I stubled upon your blog quite by accident, but look forward to an update.  
the polar bear is going to have to adapt to survive just like any other animal would. smaller bears and less numbers are the polar bear's way of surviving when there is a food shortage. i'm sure if there was an abundance of food you would be seeing bigger bears and more population. this is just nature's way whether we're responsible for global warming or not is irrevelant. this isn't a situation where humans are taking their environment its a weather change natural to the earth. for all we know bears have been fluxuating in size and numbers since their existence. i think its just a part of survival. its a shame though cause they are absolutely beautiful animals.  we didnt put them on our money for nothing.
The polar bears population may be up, as the warmth of the season lengthens, but as the article says, they are having fewer babies due to a lack of food during an important period of their growth.  Its not bull, as Glacier Park is losing its glaciers faster than we can build a new car.  I have always thought its not possible, but its happening and we can't ignore that.  I say we need to desalinate the ocean water that is available to us(especially in the southeast and western coast lines), and then return the salt to the poles that may help to hold water up there longer.  Salt retains water.  Its just an idea, but it could work.  But more importantly, we must do more to recycle and waste less.  We need to fight the corporations that are spewing pollutants in the air, to help heal the problem. Lets be a part of the solution, not part of the problem.  
Even though you were told "science doesn't work that way" you still plug "global warming".
Yes, it's getting warmer - that usually happens at the end of both a major and a minor ice age. It is still cooler than during the very recent (geologically) optimum.
In the 70's it was the coming ice age. Now it is global warming. Gore sells carbon credits to himself and spends more each month than I do in 2 years for electric. "Do as I say, not as I do"??
Do a little research. Study the geologic past. Find out the truth behind global warming and the plans the UN has for our economy.
Nice post.  I am glad to see you were willing to say that the scientist on board corrected what seems to be a knee jerk reaction by the media to blame any weather phenomenon on global warming.  "It's warm, cold, windy, cloudy, stormy, drought, floods, snow, rain, hail...It must be global warming".  What we used to call weather is now always a sign of global warming.
What an amazing trip.  I can't wait to read more posts.  The bears look beautiful, and from what I read, their populations are rising.  I think they will adapt to this climate change as they have to others in the past.
Was Lynda serious about desalinization and shipping the salt to the arctic because "salt retains water"?  I love that we let people who missed chemistry participate in the global warming debate!  Ha!
hey anyone want to buy some carbon offsets so I can join Al Gore in the private jet club....Global Warming ....please.
mS. dUKE, And how do you propose we get the salt to the poles??  tie little bags under the birds' wings? Even the Carbon fools will tell you shipping a billion tons of salt tto the poles will spew more "pollutants" into the air than the salt can cure... whata Marrooooon!!!
These two points are the most startling of all:

(AP) Scientists have observed cannibalism among polar bears for the first time.  They believe this is occurring because shorter ice seasons are reducing the availability of food. http://www.usatoday.com/weather/research/2006-06-13-polar-bear-cannibalism_x.htm

Some scientists have projected that Arctic ice may completely melt during the summer of 2050 (re-freezing in the fall).  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21343575/

Additionally, this year artic ice was melting to levels originally projected for 2050 under more conservative models than that predicting the complete summertime meltdown.
http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/08/23/arctic-will-melt-to-projected-2050-levels-this-year/
-John in Florida, Just as the article states that you can't make conclusions from a single day's weather, you can't make conclusions from a single bear and her cubs.  Overall the Arctic ice is shrinking and bears need ice to live.  Governments including our own have been racing to put in place international agreements covering how this newly accessible seafloor should be used, as well as who has shipping rights over the newly accessible sea lanes.  They wouldn't be doing this if they didn't expect the ice to continue to shrink.
Oh yeah, how do propose that the people who study the environment should be telling us what they find if they can't make a living off of the research?  No one is going to do anything for free and these people need to eat and pay taxes just like the rest of us.  And they would probobly make just as much money telling us that everything is fine.  They get paid for doing research after all, not for being shocking.
I am amazed at the response some people have to the global warming crisis without even THINKING about what they are saying. For example, the lady from Texas who suggests that we SALT the poles to increase the amount of water there because salt retains water and somehow that translates into more ice.

This is exactly the type of unthinking response people are having to the idea of global warming all over the country. They claim we must take immediate and drastic measures without regard to the cost, in order to prevent the collapse of the known world to combat something that has been occuring over thousands of years. They call it science yet cannot honestly quantify any relationship. (ie: if we reduce our carbon emissions by X amount, it will slow the progress of warming by Y rate.) Why is that? Can modern science really not find that equation? Are people afraid to admit how little we are actually affecting the climate? How come as some of this glacial ice is melting, we are finding artifacts UNDER the ice? Perhaps in a similar previous cycle (even before the evil of SUV's) there wasn't ice there?

I am not claiming that the earth is not warming. Nor am I claiming that humans have zero effect on the rate of that warming. However, I would think it behooves us to figure these things out before we initiate knee jerk reactions that cost gazillions of dollars with little effect...or worse, we cause more harm than good.
Sorry, Lynda, but adding salt to the poles after desalination is a bad idea.  Adding salt to water decreases the temperature at which water freezes.  This would increase the rate at which the ice melts, and decrease the rate at which ocean water freezes.  This is why we use road salt during icy weather.  
   Impacting the salinity of the Arctic ocean would require more salt than humans can produce.  Not to mention, a major increase in greenhouse gases would occur because desalination is a highly energy expensive action.
Although I like the fact that Lynda Duke is thinking outside the box in ways to help preserve the ice caps of the artic, maybe, being from Texas she doesn't realize that salt actually MELTS ice.
salt lowers the freezing temperature of water to 28 deg. More salt woulg make less ice. Nice thought though.
i think any voyage that brings attention to the warming north pole is worth it. i have just 1 question to those people who dont believe global warming is here - if the ice at the north & south poles has been there for so long & now is melting at a very quick pace - what is causing it if not people?
mankinds existence, plotted out on a timeline of the earths existence, would be thinner than a human hair. although the planet is getting warmer, it is impossible to know our role in this completely. scientists in ohio recently took an ice core measuring 1,000 feet. this accounted for only 130,000 years. scientists estimate the earth to be 4.5 BILLION years old. do the math. the planet is up to something, and does not require our involvement, nor our permission to continue on.
I've done quite a bit of research and am quite confused about the actual "facts" and effects - if you read the science reports it actually tells you that the models they are using for predictions aren't adequate or accurate.  That's like having medical tests that are inconclusive.  Just like other animals maybe we too will have to adjust to a new environment instead of clinging to what we have.  We've come a long way since the Native Americans roamed this land and learned to migrate for the seasons etc.  Haste makes waste and money for a few that they suck from us - remember chicken little, the War of the Worlds broadcast, why should we believe them now - I want solid proof not guesstimations.
Kudos to Lynda Duke from El Paso, TX for realizing that we have a serious problem and for thinking about it. Most Texans are insulated from reality, and I know a lot of them. If thousands of the world's top scientists think that there is global warming, and only few right wing nuts disagree, it seems pretty obvious that we actually have a real problem folks.
Everything is fine.  Global warming was a mistake.  You all may now go back to sleep now.
Please note that the lady everyone is slamming for her dumb comments about the salt, sea and ice is from EL PASO, TX---that is desert country.  Do we think she is "ice smart"?  Think about it.
That's cool.  I didn't know you guys were still on the air.  I mean, other than infomercials.  Who are the polar bears voting for?  Are they going to move up their primary?  Do you support the slaughter of innocent ring seals by the evil polar bears?  What's a carbon credit?  Does a carbon credit taste like toast?
bad attitude john florida.  all the facts are in, and yet you still take the side of the nay sayers?  They have admitted why they don't believe.  They don't because global warming will increase their taxes and regulations.  Two things conservatives hate.  So why do you still not believe?  How long and what more facts do you need?  If you don't believe all the scientists now, you never will.  4 foot thick ice is enough to support a tractor?  man, you just don't get it do you?

instead of wondering why global warming is being sold so hard, wonder why the opposition is pushing back so hard.  
folks!  they have proven that cutting down trees, and car emmissions, and depleting the ozone have warmed the earth and it is happening at a fevered pace.  we need to do what the scientists advise us to do or suffer the consequences.  People in countries all over the world are already suffering.  It just hasen't hurt us yet because we are spoiled.  And if you have really seen all the facts, there is  no doubt we are causing this.  China and India are now polluting on America's level.  Did you all think that was ok?  And I doubt any of you nay sayers have seen all the facts.  If you have, then you could not seriously be a doubter anymore.  Your arguments are coming from the pollutors.  They put the doubts out there for the lame to swallow.  Start watching planet in peril or any of those global warming documentaries, like Gore's.  I'll bet none of you people that deny human's are the cause have seen Gore's movie.  
meanwhile Canada and Russia are fighting over who is going to "own" the North Pole.  They think there is oil there so they want to be the first to plant their flags.  We are doomed!!!
Even if we get everyone in America to agree, we still have to convince Russia, China and India.  
I do believe that over the past few hundred million years that there have been WIDE swings in temperature.  The earth was hotter during the age of dinosaurs, the earth was cooler during the ice ages.  What's a few degrees here or there?  Maybe, just maybe, the earth is supposed to be a bit warmer than it currently is.  I think that there has been a bit too much generalization and inferences on the past 50-75 years somewhat reliable data.  
POPULATION CONTROL WORLD WIDE IS THE ANSWER. HERES THE LOGIC: LESS MAN LESS IMPACT. PRETTY SIMPLE EQUATION.
When I was seven (1934), I read that a hotel in Switzerland built in 1840 was closing because the glacier it was built to view had disappeared. Doesn't that mean the climate was warming long before the huge use of fossil fuels ?
The Great Lakes are lower in depth creating problems for shipping boats to carry YOUR goods to the department stores so that you can consume more garbage. Then you can place all of that in your motor vehicle then continue to drive a hour to the burbs where you contributed to Urban Sprawl. Where the neighborhoods took out forest and wetlands, and displaced other animals.

-Homosapiens are to blame for all the worlds problems. And will continue this way. Until something extreme happens to change our way of life.
-Think Globally
I have read all your comments.  I truly don't know the truth or the answer to this situation.  I do know one thing though.  We had better start thinking more seriously about it.  If we get it wrong, the whole world will pay the price.  Maybe it is time that we stopped screaming at each other and really tried to get unbiased information for a change.  Al Gore has brought attention to this, but I wish he wasn't profiting so much from his point of view.  If he is correct, he has certainly lost a lot of credibility with the way he lives.  Just because a person can afford to buy credits to offset a lifestyle that he himself claims hurts the planet does not excuse the lifestyle nor does it make it right.  Also it wouldn't hurt anyone on the planet to clean up their own act a little bit.  We have become a world where material things matter far too much.  Better get this one right!!!!!
I would like to know how much money someone could make hollering "global warming". For any "natural occurrence" or "we're too small to make a difference the planet goes through cycles”, why did we cut out fluorocarbons? And is cutting out waste really all that bad of a thing to do?  If, lets say we cut down our emissions and save a few bucks along the way and we don’t get massive climate change the downside would be what? But on the other hand we popeycock the whole global change thing and throw our recyclables in the trash and leave the lights on and let the water run from the hose just to piss off the neighbors, and the climate goes to hell in a handbasket, then what? We just say oops! I guess you were right “my bad”.  
hey nick , if you ate what Gore fed ya , i have some swamp land down here in the bayou for sale! political tool is all global warming is , dems create situations , ignoring real issues for the most part.
!! stick n move ... stick n move!!
scott , live your words... dont procreate!!
I can't resist, i have to comment on that one. Shipping salt to the poles? OK, so lets see; use a oil or coal fired plant to desalinate the water, than haul it to the poles by huge tankers that burn more oil than the desalination plant, than spread it out there with a grass seed spreader? Kudos for thinking outside the box?  Hey, I got a better idea: Maybe Al Gore could cut a deal with Gatorade to ship electrolytes out there, that will hold more water.
Bwahahahaha.......
Here is the real problem for the average person to overcome; Who do we believe? There are just as many so called experts on both sides of the global warming debate that even well meaning specialists are having a hard time being heard or believed. Yes the process of global warming seems to have escalated since the Age of Industrialization but that is not conclusive either because obviously the ice age of the dinosaurs and a catistrophic end also. There is no prove they died out over a period of time. Who do you believe anymore? Everyone seems to have an agenda and yes scientists on both sides of the question are earning a living at it so that isn't an indicator either.
To Doug from redmond, wa, there are alot of people making tons of money by creaming "global warming" Al Gore has a private plane and an estate for having done so. Look how much he makes on his speaking tours. That doesn't mean there aren't well meaning truly concerned individuals out there also nor does it mean we sholdn't cut out waste wherever possible. We seems to be using faster than the world can replenish. That really is the key.
Yep, humans are the problem - let's eliminate them and then the earth will be 'perfect'!

Al Gore is a hyperbolic wind-bag who is reaping huge benefits from his propaganda. And scientists exaggerate and shock precisely because the worry and fear they spread leads to massive spending by governments and it's the researchers that benefit.

Let's see, I've been around for the dire predictions of our demise from overpopulation, a new ice age, the ozone 'hole', bird flu, on and on, and now it's global warming - it's all just the fear du jour to con us out of more and more money to give to researchers, universities, and bureaucrats.
Whatever the reasons may be, it would be a very good thing for all of the developed world to learn to live more efficiently and to leave as small a footprint as possible on our planet.  Ours is an intelligent species, but we need to suppress our materialism and appreciate the true value of our planet - something which is not found amongst its finite resources.
The bottom line is we simply MUST get off of fossil fuels.  That’s it.  Problems solved.  The other problem is of over crowding the planet with people.  There just simply isn’t enough room to comfortably support everybody.  We are stressing the planet flora and fauna as well as stressing each other with so many billions and the materials needed to sustain everyone.

The US should recognize that green energy, living and sustainability are THE NEXT dot.com type boom.  Lets get on board and do it if not for the planet and our fellow humans then for simple, good ol’ fashioned American motivation; that being GREED!  

Why are we letting Japan and other nations take away this planet saving and wallet fattening opportunity?  The US is being left behind!  What’s up with the fools in our auto industry?  

Let’s get off the fossil fuels to protect our children from having to fight wars against terrorism.  Let’s take the money and power away from those who would destroy our children and our lifestyles by blowing up their own children in public places.  The governments and extremists of the Middle East are fat and spoiled from our dependence.  We have whored ourselves out and now we are being gang raped by the countries that have big oil.  Even our own oil companies are raping their own people.

We need a Manhattan project on sustainable energy.  Vote, people!  Raise hell to your congressmen!

And, Al Gore using credits to offset his “carbon footprint” is like a fat person burning 300 calories in the gym only to eat 300 calories of ice cream later that day.  No progress has been made.

Finally, leave the poor gal from Texas alone.  Our president came from Texas and he is the pillar of high education.  If Bush can be the pres. then she can send sea salt to the poles.  
Doug,  I read all the posts and yours hits the nail.   What is there to lose from being responsible for a change...let's see:

More trees to clean the air thus less pollution to breathe:  Oh, that's right we like to hack and cough and die from lung cancer.  We especially love paying for our children's asthma prescriptions.  Who needs goddamn trees, anyway.  Afterall, they are big sticks which don’t provide shade from the hot sun, color in the fall, or shelter from the wind.  Screw em!  

More wetlands/protected watersheds to filter the water:  Oh!  I forgot!  We *love* the full-bodied flavor of chemically-enhanced chlorinated tap water!  And after all…it’s so much cheaper to just pay our cities tens of thousands of dollars each year to “clean” the water, so that we can buy bottled water, just so we can fill in wetlands to build yet *another* 50% occupied strip mall or vinyl-village housing sect.  

Reduced trash: That’s right, we love large stinking, rat infested garbage piles the size of small towns.  It’s so much better than a lovely meadow with singing larks and spring peeps.  Who gives a damn about mother nature, anyway?  She does *nothing* for us, right?  (I’ve always said, we would never have gotten here if they’d dubbed the earth “father nature.”  It’s only because we made the earth “mother” and proclaimed it “female” that we continue to exploit, abuse, and disregard it.  However, like any good mother…she *will* eventually give us a nice reminder who is really in charge.)  Again, screw her! I’ll drive my big assed SUV right over her beautiful grasses and piss on her flowers.   What do*I* care!      

So for those of you who fail to understand that without regard to the Al Gore’s of the world, we *do* have an impact on our natural resources.  Frankly, it doesn’t matter *if* or *that* Global Warming is going to lead to the end of mankind anytime soon.  I want to enjoy the earth I live on now and I want my children, grandchildren, et al to have clean air, clean water, and a beautiful mountains and trees to visit…and *NOT* in a museum.  I’d also like to look them in the eye and know that I wasn’t a self possessed idiot who only thinks as far as then end of his/her nose.  Responsibility pays off for everyone, including your ignorant, selfish asses!
Let's see - seals give birth on the ice because it's between them and the land and polar bears hunt the seals on the ice because that's where the seals are. If the ice melts, seals will have to give birth on land and bears can hunt seals on land. So, lack of ice will cause the bears to walk shorter distances to eat seals. Seems to me that the bears win - not so?

Also, cannibalism has been reported any number of times in bears, lions, etc (watch the old science channel shows. Males especially will eat cubs in hopes the female will go into heat again - not just polar bears, but brown, black, grizzly, etc. Same with lions. Heck, even squirrels will occasionally eat another squirrel's young as a source of protein to pass along to their own young.

Let's all get hysterical, march around in a circle while pointing outward and singing kumbaya.

Bugs Bunny was right - "what a bunch of maroons"

Want to help deal with overpopulation? Well, you could always offer yourself up as the first sacrifice to the cause...
Ok this is how I see it. Nobody knows anything for sure as to what is causing global warming (although I personally believe it is caused by human activity). We just all for the most part can agree it is happening. This is the part that kills me, there isn't one person on earth that can prove or disprove what is causing global warming and be 100 percent certain or at least come up with enough evidence to convince the naysayers we've got to do something. So what do we do? Sit on our hands and wait and see what happens, make excuses and arguments as to why we think we are right and the others are wrong. If we use the wait and see what happens approach it may be too late to reverse the effects. What do we do when it's too late? Hang our heads down in shame, make more excuses and hope for the best? Regardless of global warming we're exhausting earth's resources. We're running out of oil. We need to come to a form of enlightenment as a whole in society and work towards a solution. I know it's easier said than done but the answer is not going to fall out of the sky, people need to get their heads out of their rear ends and stop being the mindless sheep that we've become when it comes to these matters. I am by no means what one would refer to as a tree hugging hippie, but I am an educated person that can think for myself and it doesn't take a ph.d to realize we're in trouble.
Scientific studies dating back over the last 100 years show that the human carbon footprint is less than 1/100th of a percent of the Earth's carbon footprint.  One volcano puts out more carbon emissions than we could put out in 50 years.  The ozone layer is actually smaller now then it was 100 years ago.  The warming is caused by an expansion cycle of the sun.  It is natural for stars, like the sun, to go through expansion and contraction cycles.  It has been this way since the beginning of time.  Wake up people.
I believe the industrialization of the world is exsaserbating a natural phenomenon at a rate faster than mother earth can handle, she needs our help to get back in balance. Even if you don't believe in global warming what harm can it to to be environmentally concious. Also there is a much more urgent threat to the world, nuclear weapons in the hands of loose cannons. If we don't deal with that first this debate dosen't mean much.
Oh come on!! Am I the only that remembers Al Gore saying he invented the internet?  He was blasted on every news station and talk show for being so dumb!  I'm not saying I don't believe that global warming is a serious problem, but believe in Al Gore??????  That's really a stretch.
Why will Gore not have a debate with sientists that dis agree with him. Why not a debate over several nights on TV and let every one watch and make up their minds.
I agree with sammas. Population control is the answer.
Polar Bears are one of the most highly adaptable predators on the planet; I should know I studied them for almost 32 years. Contrary to the now popular thought process, Polar Bears very rarely have drowned. They are highly capable of changing foraging areas to any change in their food supply. They have been seen swimming the Bearing Sea to Russia when food supply had been reduced due to man made and/or natural circumstances.

The fact that certain Bears look smaller or are having a reduced amount of cubs is nature’s way of controlling the largest and most powerful predator that walks this planet, you see there are no natural predators for the Polar Bear, with the exception of man. So we have seen this happen before, when the bear population got to large, mother nature reduces it through natural selection to make sure that the others don’t starve, or the natural food supply isn’t decimated by the bears themselves.

Global Warming fanatics should quit using the Polar Bear as one of their main measuring sticks for their beliefs; it is just making them look foolish,

Morgan Harman PHD
Former Director Artic Mammals Studies
Please save our planet!  We've got to join forces and not let the "health of the economy" be the first priority.  It will be short lived at the expense of the health and welfare of future generations to come.
The whole issue is business guys.  Forget global warming for 1-1-1 second.  Make it cheaper/less fuel intensive/easier and people will do it. Forget whether it is or isn't global warming.  Make it easier for me to not pay $3 a gallon at the tank.  Why don't you who hath now complained go study chemistry and figure a way to NOT do these things you ask, ie burn fuels, make it easier for me to not throw things into the trash but rather put them in a bin or recycle in-house?  Let's make everyone else change??? Good luck.  You have seen the debt issue right, it will get better huh?  Oh and the green party? Who???  Pollution?  Getting better right?  People, fix it, stop complaining.  The world doesn't owe you a living/welfare/pollution free society, you are demanding it.  You are smart go fix it.  Reading and spamming these things won't make it any better, maybe like 100 years from now after "it's happened" according to y'all.  I'm tired of sides I don't care either way (global warming in my eyes is  a form of population control), but you have to do something other than lobby about it.  Make it business savvy(Republicans) AND make it environmentally feasible(Dems) and it will happen.  I'm saying you're smart, these are the goals, go for it. AND by the way email me so I can invest in your new company :) LOL


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=445074

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.