ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Iraqi journalists, faceless, but not voiceless

Posted: Friday, August 24, 2007 7:23 AM
Filed Under:

Nermeen al-Mufti reported on the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980's – she was the only female Iraqi reporter on the frontlines.

Like many Iraqi journalists, Mufti is a nationalist. She didn’t live through the Saddam years, raise a child on her own, and spend years trying to show Western journalists parts of the real Iraq to give up now.

She moved from Baghdad to her hometown of Kirkuk and started an Arabic-language newspaper, as well as writing in English for the weekly al-Ahram. 

Electricity cuts, curfews, and unpredictable phone and Internet lines are only the start of difficulties there. Like all journalists and any other Iraqi in the public eye, she faces the very real prospect of being killed for doing her job – being caught in a cross-fire or a car bomb, or like dozens of local journalists, deliberately targeted.

VIDEO: 'Most dangerous assignment in the world'

More than 140 journalists and media workers have been killed in Iraq since the war began – most of them murdered and most of them Iraqi. 

"Until now no one has been tried for killing, kidnapping or torturing a journalist," Mufti points out.

Apart from the physical danger, there are also increasing government restrictions on what Iraqi journalists can cover and the threat of suspension, fines or jail for unwarranted criticism of public figures.

"I’m not a hero, but I think it’s my duty to write toward keeping Iraq united," says Mufti. "I do it to try to restore the Iraq I knew – that gave me my identity, memories and pride."

Need for independent voices
For several years before the war, I was the only Western correspondent permanently based in Iraq. There was no independent Iraqi media. People like Mufti tried to push the envelope by writing a trouble-shooting column in state newspapers for people having issues with Iraqi government bureaucracy. For any Iraqis – including journalists - even asking normal questions could get them and their families thrown in jail.

When Baghdad fell, I was thrilled to see Iraqi journalists get on their feet, learn how to ask questions, and finally demand answers. Now those Iraqi voices – the only people who can really speak for their country - are being silenced again.

A lot of Iraqi journalists don’t write under their own names. Most of them started in other professions and never thought of being reporters, but they are the eyes, ears and insights that make it possible for Western journalists to write anything at all.

Many of them go to great lengths to remain anonymous – particularly when it comes to being photographed or videotaped.

Our producer Ghazi Balkiz interviewed one woman working for an American newspaper in silhouette so she wouldn’t be recognized – by people who might want to kill her, and even by her own family.

"Very few people know what I do," said the journalist, a single mother of two. "My father doesn’t know what I do. My father doesn’t know what I do for the simple reason that it would give him a heart attack."

I got a call a few months ago from another courageous Iraqi journalist I’d known in the Saddam days. She worked for a Western news organization and was one of the very few people I knew who would persist in trying to get answers – at the cost of regularly having her credentials revoked by the Information Ministry and being barred from working.

She had supported her entire family for years. When I talked to her though she said she was just staying at home – it had become too dangerous to work.

Determined to tell their stories
The journalist interviewed by Ghazi said she continued to take the risk of working because Iraqis had allowed the rest of the world to make assumptions about them and now they had to speak for themselves.

"Who should tell the world about our culture? It is us. Who should tell the world about our beliefs? It is us. Who should tell the world about our lives? Why have we waited?"

"What I’m trying to say is, please don’t take (what is happening in Iraq) at face value," she said. "Get to know us better."

We couldn’t show her face on camera. We couldn’t print her name. But her voice, and Mufti’s and all the other Iraqi journalists who believe telling stories of their people and their country is worth risking everything is still strong.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Americans should read the Iraqi newspapers online to get a sense of who we are trying to help.  It is true, that many Americans and indeed most of the civilized world lives on sound bites and video clips.

But it is necessary and important to take the time to get the message direct from the horse's mouth. When you see individuals with courage like that,fighting for a better world, how can you not try to help them?
I'm truley proud and supportive of the men and women of Iraq who are working under the most  dangerous of environments to get the real news about the struggles in "their" country out to the world.  It is my hope that the U.S. presence in Iraq does have and will have a positive outcome for the future of this historic and beautiful land.
I praise the Iraqi reporters that have the courage to let the world know about their country.  I track information  about Iraq anywhere I can find it since the media reports are so distorted.  I would much rather hear from an Iraqi who has lived through all the terrible things that have happened than some reporter out of New York, they are just trying to up their ratings or sell papers
Dear Jane, I really admire the bravery and dedication of all the journalists to try and cover this region and tell the story of the struggle of the Iraqi people. Nermeen al-Mufti is certainly taking risks everyday when going out into the city and surrounding areas while all the violence is happening. The only way to understand the conflict is to ask the people of the region. You do a wonderful job Jane covering the area and so does the rest of the Baghdad Bureau. Getting the message out from the people helps us on the outside to comprehend the situation. I hope all the journalists stay safe while covering this region. Because even though you all take precautions you are still people and people cannot be relaced. Stay safe Jane, Richard and the whole Baghdad Bureau! And all the local journalists too! Peace to all!
What a bunch of crap! You hide their faces so no one can question their credibility and there's been enough proved fake stories to warrant the questioning. How about the 6 torched Sunnis that never happened? How about the "headless bodies" that turned out to be false? These stringers have an agenda and it's not to tell the truth. Bilal Hussein is one example of what the military is up against with regards to the media.  
It's interesting to hear what we are thinking and opinionating on something that we truly don't have any idea on.  Unless you are there and see it for your own eyes, we are not worthy on commenting on any Iraq issues.  Whether these stories are true or not, we can only hope that people all over the world are free and safe to do what is right as a human being.  Wars and bloodshed has been occurring since the beginning of time.  This happens because people are in disagreement on something.  How sad!!!
I've read this journalist's B.S. before and I am confident that NBC wouldn't be employing her if she weren't taking a decdidely anti-U.S. stance. The people of Iraq are heroic. It's the left wing media in America along with Iran who are most determined to kill any hopes of real democracy in Iraq.
I have to agree with T. Hill in Carrollton, Texas. Although it would be worthwhile to obtain information from Iraq directly from Iraqi journalists who are in Iraq, I wonder about how many stories are simply not true due to propaganda that was promulgated by a "journalist" with a hidden agenda.  How does one know what is true or not true in this situation?  How many of these journalist have been vetted for their non-biased reporting? I don't accept everything that I read as being the truth.  American journalists have been known to lie or stretch the truth in the past.  I will not put it past an Iraqi journalist to do the same if it fulfills some agenda that the journalist may support.  
I was born in Denmark in 1923 and lived through 5 years of occupation by the germans. When occupiers try to suppress unfavorable news, an underground press will retaliate with facts and rumors that in some cases prove to be unfounded.
T Hill, you are indeed ignorant if you think Iraqi journalists are lying or hiding the truth from the rest of the world. It's the US journalists who are lying and helping the administration and military cover up their deeds in Iraq. I did a tour in Iraq, one solid year, so I know what I'm talking about. The story Bush and his followers give about Iraq, is completely different from what's actually happening on the ground. You're probrably a typical REPUBLICAN COWARD, who has never served in the military, and don't have the stones to participate in what you support. I can attest to going on patrols in Iraq, and seeing headless corpses, or even dismemberd body parts laying in the street, with children playing less than 100 yards away. Iraq is a tragedy of epic porportions, and those Iraqi reporters are trying their best to get the truth out. Do your research, or better still, be a man and sign up, before you go shooting your cowardly mouth off.
Hi, I am just a simple, single working woman in the USA. I try so hard to understand the different religious views of Islam that so divide Iraq. I question whether outsiders could ever fix it, could ever bring peace amongst you. I do not believe in war. My heart hurts each time I see anyone die from this horrible conflict. I do not believe everything my government says, and yet, I do not believe everything Iraq's government says. I am searching for a way to make peace between all. Can Iraqi's do that? Is that possible? Has your religious devisivenous made that an impossible dream? Sincerely, Carol Lane
I worked with several Iraqi journalists and their bravery is immense. I had to wonder sometimes how they did it actually, I mean we get to go home and to safety, but their home is the warzone they report on and they have no safety.
Of course I realized it eventually and it comes down to them wanting to voice the reality of their world to the full world, to not go unseen and unheard, but to awaken the world to the injustices and let the truth come clean.

And to t. hill: what beheadings that turned out to be false? I've heard of many, and they all proved to be true.
As for why their faces are hidden: it isn't to save them from credibility questioning (as the news circuits can simply cut the Iraqis they deem "uncredible"), it's about protecting them a bit more from those who would want to kill them for "working with the West."
I always wonder why I never saw an Iraqi journalist in the American Media. In any media TV or newspaper. Never ever! I also never saw any interview with any prominent Iraqi citizen. I guess now we know why. But it's outrageous that nobody question this matter. Why do we have to hear about Iraqi only through American journalists? It's obvious there is something wrong with this. We know that the horrible things we hear from Iraqi are much worse, but of course they are censored here in the United States. I wonder if those who supported the war in the beginning and now, specially the American media that promoted the War, like CNN, MSNBC, Fox etc. Are not shameful of the situation in Iraq. At the time people who were againt the war in Iraq were ridiculued by the American media. What are we doing in Iraq that make the life of Iraqis so miserable? What kind of government that is segregated from the ordinary Iraqi citizens, since the government and american occupiers are living in a military Fortress. I wish when the american politicians go to Iraqi they would be exposed to the same things the Iraqi people are. How can someone can say that we turned Iraq a democracy? Why politicians here and journalists here think we are all idiots? The war in Iraqi is a desaster the county was destroyed this is the reality.
Is there something in the water in Carrollton, TX?  Why so much anger from T. Hill.  You appear to be consumed by it.  Your statement is completely void of any compassion.  Are you angry that Iraqi's want to tell the world about the devastation in their country and the senseless killings?  Are you angry that the information coming from Iraq is not what you want to hear?  Are you angry that the war in Iraq has become such a mess that we may actually "lose" the war even though we win every battle?  Are you angry that such an incompetant administration undertook such a foolish war when we should have been focusing on eliminating Al-Qaeda (which didn't exist in Iraq when we invaded in 2003)? Are you suggesting that all the information provided by Iraqi reporters is completely based on political agendas?  T. Hill is a perfect example of the arrogance and stupidity of so many Americans that don't want to hear the truth about Iraq.  Evidently, T. Hill would simply have the military control all news from Iraq so that it can fight this war in the dark and tell us when it has emerged "victorious" some day down the road.  And then we can get on to the next country that needs to be invaded because we can't be bothered with the complexities of muslim extremism or the horrors of war.  

As an American, I too am angered by the information coming from Iraq.  Was it necessary to kill over 100,000 Iraqi's and almost 4,000 Americans, destroy the country, create chaos in the region, create a potential safe haven for Al Qaeda, and end up spending trillions of dollars just to get rid of Saddam and a few chemical weapons.  That is what makes me angry and I can only hope that next time real Americans, the media, and our elected representatives will ask the right questions and demand answers before we embark on such a costly and foolish "crusade".  

War is brutal T. Hill - open your eyes.  Who deserves more respect - these courageous people that are risking their lives to tell their story, or the members of the U.S. administration that lied us into this war.  What a bunch of crap! is a very apt statement - it should, however, have been directed to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Wolfowitz et al back in 2002/2003!!
It would be very hard to believe anything coming out of Iraq. It is a country of liars and haters devouring anyone and everyone. Truth? Always hard to find, but impossible in Iraq.
all wars are a search for truth!these men and women commit their lives as soldiers do!i admire, their work is invaluble.  
liberal media liberal media liberal media
People from Iraq are the same as anyone around the world. All people should be free. This terrible war must stop. All though the culture in the middle east is differant from mine. We the peopl of the world need to sit down and talk with each other....killing has never solved problems...Having recently returned from Egypt I can see the differance, but then on the other hand I can see the same. My take is "Fat men don"t fight"...Meaning..if you have a roof over you head....food on the table and your family is taken care of...What is there to fight about?...Patricia Jonas Voulgaris....Lake County, Ca.
If a person doesn't question their government, then that person isn't truly a citizen. A true citizen will not blindly accept whatever their government "chooses" to tell them. A government that has nothing to hide will allow people to speak freely, without fear of being "silenced". It is when government gags or controls the media that citizens should truly be outraged, and make every attempt to get at the truth. Silencing those who speak out against a governments actions is a form of dictatorship. Freedom of speech in the U.S. is still a constitutional right. The war in Iraq is supposed to be about creating a democracy. Why, then, should journalists have to be afraid of being abucted or killed in Iraq for voicing their right to free speech? Governments that don't allow free speech have something to hide, and the only way to identify what it is they are trying to hide is through investigative journalism. Unfortunately, in the U.S., we have very few true "investigative journalists" anymore. All we really hear is sound bites on the news, and even those have often been "filtered". And too many citizens have come to accept that as "news". Whether one is a "liberal" or a "right-winger", we will all pay a heavy price if we allow our constitutional right to freedom of speech to be compromised by our government. The same holds true for the citizens of other countries who are not allowed to speak out freely. And we will have only ourselves to blame, and will all have to suffer the consequences. Remember, it is the citizenry of the country who are supposed to be in control of their government, not the other way around.
To all those who question why sources of information are hidded from the cameras - why don't you switch places with them for a week?  YOU get to live in a hut, without running water or electricity or a kitchen or a bathroom, or even a real bed.  YOU get to hear gunshots, bombs and smell smoke and see fire every day.  YOU get to run for your life when the insurgents start shooting in your neighborhood.  YOU get to walk through feces, rat-infested buildings.  YOU try to find a job or earn a decent living wage.  YOU get to evade the Iraqi soldiers, the Iraqi police, the Iraqi insurgents.

Then come back home to the U.S. and tell us about your experiences.  We'll see how brave your insulting demeaning words about journalists are then.
Texansmile, I gave two examples of stories that were given by Iraqi Journalist that turned out to be false and were proved to be false. BTW, I served in the military probably much longer than you. I actually don't believe you served or you wouldn't be hiding behind some ficticious name.

G. Carry, you may want to do your research about Al-Qaeda in Iraq, http://www.meib.org/articles/0405_iraq1.ht
(add "m" on the end of the line)

Pvt. James,
Reuters 6/30/2007
"US says report of 20 beheaded bodies in Iraq false"
"BAGHDAD, June 30 (Reuters) - Media reports attributed to Iraqi police of 20 decapitated bodies found south of Baghdad this week were untrue and may have been planted by insurgents to provoke revenge attacks, the U.S. military said on Saturday.

"Coalition and Iraqi officials began investigating to determine if the reports were true. Ultimately it was concluded the reports were false," the military said in a statement"

"Verifying reports in Iraq is very hard for journalists, who have been systematically targeted by different militant groups and rely extensively on local sources for information."


Anymore challengers?
So this Iraqi journalist is risking her life in order to "restore the Iraq (she) knew – that gave (her) (her) identity, memories and pride." And which Iraq would that be? The one before the U.S. invaded her country on false premises, supported by all those gullible Americans who drank Bush's Kool-Aid? Or the current Iraq, unstable, ripped by civil war and festering with terrorists who have carpe diemed? At any rate, I applaud her bravery, and I love and support the U.S. troops who are doing their best in a no-win situation that was created by their Commander-in-Chief and his henchmen, all of whom are so out of touch with reality that it is beyond scary.
It is interesting that we have a US politician that had to swear in on 'Thomas Jeffersons Koran'  because he never ead his history to find out that Mr Jefferson read it "to understand his enemy".

It is interesting that Bill and Hilarity proclaimed that Saddam had to be attacked and removed with his weapons of mass destruction.  Hmmmm, oh yes now we have a Bush to bash, so we can conveniently forget that.

And we have the highest reenlistment rate in our nation's history, and I still see left wing stories on   a draft.

Personally I do not watch the news or read the newspapers.  I have plenty of family and friends in Iraq, who tell me why they are there.  Why they choose to serve more terms over there.   They have a philosophy similar to Thomas Jefferson.  They are there for the same reason.

Islam is the enemy not the people.  Read the koran, there is no peaceful existance in the koran.  Just like the Ambassador to the Bey of Algiers to John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, " our religion(islam) only allows us to convert, subjugate, or kill.  there is on other way"  

Our soldiers and most politicians who aren't presently posturing for attention realize, that if we were not over there, then we would be having more of them over here.

It is ok to listen to journalists(most who twist everything to fit their ideals), but why not listen to those who keep going back to serve over there why?   Hmmmm,  maybe they would like to prevent another 9/11?
Jane,
As I know you've personally been in the warzone post invasion and were even in there while Saddam was still running things I really appreciate your comments on this topic.

I had the chance to go to Kurdistan last summer as a freelance writer but for financial reasons wasn't able to go (between insurance and travel costs it's tens of thousands of dollars for an individual) so when I get to hear reports like this I truly respect and appreciate them as I do with your personal reports Jane.  Thanks and please keep them up.  We appreciate the human aspect that you bring to this conflict, regardless of one's position on the removal of Saddam Hussein.
Rupert sounds like a Bush appointee. A country of liars and haters? xactly how many excuses did Bush give for attacking Iraq before settling on something he felt would appease the US public? And how many lies have he and his administration been caught on since then? Can you even count that high?

As for haters, just who invaded whom? Perhaps you can explain exactly what Iraq and it's despicable dictator (who was apparently much less despicable when doing the USA's bidding) had to do with the World Trade Center atttacks. Or why bin Laden is still roaming free. Or even why Bush said e doesn't think about bin Laden much. Haters attack other countries. Do you even know why it occurred?
G.Carry:
   You have raised some very interesting questions. But i would like your answers.
i- you mentioned "DEVASTATION" COMMITTED BY WHO, ARE YOU SAYING THE AMERICANS DID ALL THESE ACTS OF DESTRUCTION OR IS IT STILL BEING DONE BY THE ENEMY?
2-"SENSELESS KILLINGS" HERE AGAIN ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE AMERICANS ARE MURDERING THE POPULATION ? OR ARE THESE MURDERS BEING CARRIED OUT BY THE ENEMY?
3-"100,000 IRAQIS KILLED" BY WHOM THE U.S. SOLDIERS OR THE DARE I SAY THE ENEMY??
4-"4000 AMERICANS KILLED" BY WHOM THE PEOPLE THEY ARE THERE DEFENDING OR THE TRUE ENEMY OF THE OF THE PEOPLE IN IRAQ ?
5- YOU USE THE WORD "CRUSADE" THE MERE USE OF THE WORD IS INSULTING ! THE "CRUSADES" WERE FOUGHT AS WARS OF CONQUEST.ARE YOU SAYING WE ARE THERE TO CONQUER AND KEEP IRAQ?BECAUSE IF THAT WERE THE CASE WE ARE REALLY FIGHTING THIS WAR BADLY, WE SHOULD BE KILLING AND DESTROYING EVERYTHING IN SIGHT !! WHICH WE ARE NOT DOING BECAUSE THIS HAS BEEN A WAR OF LIBERATION.WE ARE IN A DEFENSIVE WAR, I SAY THAT BECAUSE WE ARE DEFENDING THE POPULATION NOT LOOKING TO CONQUER IT.
AS FOR THE REPORTER WHY IS SO WRONG TO QUESTION HER REPORTING OR HER SLANT ON HER REPORTING?HAVE WE NOT BEEN FED LIES FR0M THE MEDIA?HOW MANY STORIES HAVE BEEN PROVEN WRONG? AND BY THAT I AM SAYING BY BOTH SIDES?FROM ALL REPORTS THE SURGE IS MAKING PROGRESS AND THAT SHOULD FORCE THEIR FAILURE OF A GOVERNMENT WILL SOON HAVE TO MAKE SOME HARD CHANGES WITH IT.THE IRAQI PEOPLE WILL SOON BE AFTER THE GOVERNMENT TO DO IT'S JOB. ALL THEY NEED IS TIME TO FEEL SAFE ENOUGH TO VOICE THEIR OPINIONS.TILL NOW THEY HAVE BEEN TRYING TO STAY OUT OF TROUBLE AND WILL SOON BE SCREAMING FOR THEIR GOVERNMENT TO GET OFF IT'S COLLECTIVE A** AND GET IT DONE THEY KNOW WHAT THEY NEED TO DO. AND LIKE POLITICIANS EVERY WHERE THE WANT TO KEEP THEIR JOBS AND AN ANGRY POPULATION IS NOT WHAT THEY WANT TO DEAL WITH.
It is tough, I personally do not agree with reporters on the front lines, I can tell you all war is bad and horrible and terrible things happen. I hated it when reporters were embedded with us, not so much that I was worried about doing the wrong thing, but moreover I was concerned with how they would perceive things. They are there for a story, soldiers are there to do a job and that job includes killing your enemy. I can remember many times after a fire fight, my guys all asking "what the hell just happened?" it was my job to direct fire and keep us together, it was their job to return fire and execute our plans. The reporter was generally buried in a vehicle looking out the window. They cannot see inside of my mind or inside the minds of my soldiers, they are only reporting on what they see. I can tell you it is chaos and terrifying, but muscle memory kicks in, you fall back to your training and your instincts and you react. You cannot change how you reacted, you only know that you are alive and your enemy is dead. Your reaction has to be instantanious and there is no going back once you have pulled the trigger. I can tell you I am plagued by coulda, woulda shouda's. I can always see things clearer after the storm, but my reactions will stay the same. The last thing I want is someone armchair quarterbacking, and the reporter is only reporting on what he or she saw. They are not reporting on what the soldier saw or fealt. It is like that throughout life, we can all look back and see how we would have done things differently to ease our present pain, but at the time we made those choices we did not see all of the options that we can clearly say now.

I am proud of my service, I am proud of my guys, I am proud of my country and if called again, I will go. I just want all of you to sit back and think of all the things you would have done differently if you could do them over, soldiers are no different, but our decisions have more dire consequences.

When you see a vet, and you see the pain in his eyes or the hatred. When you see his limp or at times his guilt ridden face. when you see him hug his children extra close or wipe a tear from his eye during the flag ceremony. When you see him hang his head when he see's people here take their freedoms for granted and proclaim "They are not fighting for MY freedom" take a few minutes to think of what he might have lived through.

He will not typically share the details as they are very painful to rememeber and when I say painful, I mean he is not just telling a story, he is reliving it, the sights, the sounds, the SMELLS, the screams, the chaos, the fear, the not knowing, and the absolute chaos.

There is a FOG of war and for those of us that have served in combat, we understand it. We would like to leave everything in that fog, but it is impossible. Sometimes it his helpful to talk about it, without being judged (if you offer be prepared to hear things that are brutal and crazy) Sometimes memories are best kept inside until you are emotionally ready to revisit them, sometimes things are so violent and so costly that for your own well being, your mind has blanked them out.

The last thing a soldier wants is to get home, turn on the TV and see the nightmare again. I cannot watch any news.

War is brutal, but like my mother said, "if you want to end all wars, thats easy, just have the good civilized people shut up, sit down and take whatever is served to them" there is alot of truth to that.  
sgt, you have said it all!!!

a sgt's mom
on his 4th. tourj
This is actually my first comment ever, and I apoligize if it's long winded, but I had to say something.

So reporters are all about being the providers of Truth, honesty, and integrity, think again.

If I recall correctly, most of the information provided to the US in regards to wmd, and everything else that the US received was from Iraqi dissedents living outside Iraq.  They left Iraq because they did not like the government and wanted to overthrough the current Iraqi Government.  These so-called infomants for the US had a personal agenda of their own.  They were the ones that told the US about WMD’s, and Chemical, Biological agents, and the brutality of the government.  They also said that the people of Iraq was ready for a new leadership and that the entire country would be on their side.  They also said that they were ready to go back to Iraq and form a democracy.    They used the Bush administration to invade Iraq for their own political agenda.  But the US thought they could convince the UN to go along by making false statements of WMD and that Saddam was capable of sending WMD to US soil.  When the UN did not fall for the propoganda, they enlisted the aid of the so-called “Coalition Forces” made up of countries all around the World.  They had you believing that the rest of the World was with them.  Oh, by the way, does anyone know what countries participated in the Coalition.  Let me tell you:   USA; Czech Republic; Lithuania; Armenia; Macedonia; Bosnia/Herzegovina; Estonia; Kazakhstan; Moldova; Singapore; Poland; Romania; El Salvador; Georgia; Azerbaijan; Denmark; Bulgaria; Albania; Mongolia; Britain; Australia; South Korea; Hungary.

These are just small countries that was bribed by the US to participate.  monetary and other incentives from the United States in return for sending troops to or otherwise supporting the Iraq war.  In May 2003, Singapore became the first Asian nation to sign a free trade agreement with the US.  In 2004, Bush fast-tracked a free trade agreement with Australia,  the involvement of other members of the coalition was in response for indirect benefits, such as support for NATO membership or other military and financial aid.  Indeed, almost all of the Eastern European nations involved in the Coalition have either recently joined or are in the process of joining the US-led NATO alliance (namely Bulgaria, Georgia, Albania, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Romania and Slovakia).  At least one country, Georgia, is believed to have sent soldiers to Iraq as an act of repayment for the American training of security forces that could potentially be deployed to the break-away regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.  Indeed, Georgian troops that were sent to Iraq have all udnergone these training programs.  El Salvador’s deployed troops in return for membership in the Central American Free Trade Agreement, and as a member of the right-wing ARENA party that was supported heavily by the US during the El Salvador Civil War.

The Iraqi’s that were reporting what was happening in Iraq was not being truthful or honest.  Most of the people in these countries only have one-sided information provided to them throughout their entire lives, and then they report only what they want you to see,just like the Bush administration War Machine.  If they can’t convince you, then they bribe you.  I’m not saying that all the reporters in Iraq are like this, and I can’t judge them because I don’t even know them.  If a complete stranger came up to you on the streets and started telling about something he saw on another block, or another city, would you believe him at face value, or be skeptical.  Especially if it’s some unbelievable story.
A lot of reporters in the US report one sided opinions and call them news reports.

Look at all the news channels on cable and you get my drift.  False reporting happens all the time, take a look at Dan Rather for example and what happened to him.  Don’t get me wrong, I like Dan Rather, but it only takes one false report to discredit a good reporter.  Believe none of what you read, and half of what you see.
Attackers attack. Faith hold, misled. We shall see in the end.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=330864

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.