ABOUT WORLD BLOG

NBC News World Blog aims to provide a dynamic look at world events and trends -- both big and small -- from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries -- from text to video -- will explore news events and how they are shaping our world.

Regular contributors include NBC News correspondents, producers and staff based in bureaus across the world and on assignment.

Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog.



Musharraf in troubled waters 

Posted: Thursday, May 31, 2007 7:39 AM
Filed Under:

Pakistan’s Pervez Musharraf has long been a true political survivor. In the eight years since he seized power in a military coup and pursued a vision for a non-theological Islamic state, he has endured three assassination attempts as well as weathering many political storms -- from the opposition parties, Islamic parties and even from within his own political base.

But he may now have picked a fight he cannot win.

His decision on March 9 to suspend the Supreme Court’s chief justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, on allegations of misconduct has unleashed a crisis that has left his regime struggling to survive as it faces a countrywide pro-democracy movement, with Chaudhry becoming a touchstone for those who want to see an end to military rule.

"Go Musharraf Go!" shouted the thousands gathered outside the Pakistan Supreme Court building in the nation’s capital, Islamabad, last Saturday night.

"Absolute power corrupts absolutely," warned Chaudhry, quoting the 19th century English historian Lord Acton in a 25-minute speech against military dictatorship.

The protests against Musharraf have become more widespread and more violent -- plunging the country into the worst political crisis it has seen since the army seized power in a bloodless coup in 1999.

More than 40 people were killed in Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city and financial hub, when Chaudhry tried to address the local bar association. Most Pakistanis blame Musharraf and his political allies for the carnage.

Lead-up to the dismissal
A well-placed intelligence source who was privy to the lead-up to Chaudhry’s dismissal said that the removal of the chief justice came "because he had annoyed those who matter in the intelligence ranks and among the police."

The same source, who requested anonymity, added that Chaudhry "had passed down judgments and questioned the authority of the intelligence agencies in the cases of missing persons."

Hundreds of people have disappeared in Pakistan, many of them picked up by Pakistan’s powerful intelligence agents and kept in secret detention centers, critics charge. These same people say the government has exploited the current anti-terrorism climate to get rid of those who they deem to be enemies of the state.

As chief justice, Chaudhry had started investigations and called the government’s actions a "violation of fundamental human rights."

"When I was arrested and taken into a torture cell," said one recently released prisoner who spoke on the condition of anonymity, "intelligence guys were saying that this chief justice couldn’t rule against them. The moment he does, he will be out of his job."

But it was not just the anger of Pakistan’s spies that cost Chaudhry his job, observers say. Many believe that Musharraf saw the former chief justice as someone who would challenge his plans to run for re-election later this year.

On February 24, just two weeks before he was dismissed, Chaudhry was asked whether it was constitutional for Musharraf to seek re-election as president. He responded, "I will decide according to the law and the constitution." Apparently, that was not the response Musharraf was looking for.

Verdict still out
Not everyone is counting Musharraf out yet. Many Pakistanis think that he will weather this storm, primarily because he has the backing of the United States government.

"The U.S. will continue to support President Musharraf because there is no substitute for him in the army who can, and will, give the kind of support the U.S. wants in the war on terror," said Lt. General Hamid Javed, formerly Pakistan’s Secretary of Defense.

And even more important are the top generals at home. The very powerful Pakistan Army Corp commanders are still with Musharraf. As long as they don't withdraw their support his grip on power seems assured.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It is very easy to pass comments from far away, based on news which may be one sided. People Living in Pakistan can only depend on the news which is also One sided. If you look at the picture from both sides, judgements can be made. In the case of President Musharraf. He at least is not corrupt as previous rulers.No stories have emerged in localor foreign papers for any case of corruptuion. For the moment He should stay till the elections.For him to stay longer will make the public feel fedup and would require a change. As for the Chief Justice's case. He and his men have made a terrible mistake. He should now make amends which would make him stronger and the public would accept him for another 5 years.
Hey guys, don't blame Musharraf. He is just doing what Bush is doing here in US - choking the voice of democracy, taking away your freedom and making you wish that you were never born if you dare to criticize him. No wonder Bush and Musharraf are so close friends! Bush needed a country to keep Bin Laden in till the end of his term so that the American people are scared. He also needed to keep an eye on China and India. There's no better place than Pakistan and no better person than Musharraf, even if he's a military dictator - so what?
Mushraf should now leave the power and let other politician take over the presidency.
I agree that Musharraf is corrupt. (Sounds like Washington doesn't it) But I also agree that one reason the people over there hate us is because of our interference into their lives and government. Wonder how George Bush would like it if one of those eastern countries came over here and told us how we were going to run our country.
pakistan,s political leaders have time and again proved inability to lead nation because basically they are feudals,selfish,unpatriotic,extremely disloyal. we dont need them.
Go Ron S. Go. You hit the nail right on the head.
The new definition of Democracy is 'Electing to power any Person or Government that is in Full agreement and complicit with the Policies and Actions of the US Government'
Musharraf should go if he is not going to abide by the independent judiciary. US is applying an utterly hypocritical role by supporting Musharraf and not seeking democratic reform that Musharraf had originally promised.
Musharraf should go if he is not going to abide by the independent judiciary. US is applying an utterly hypocritical role by supporting Musharraf and not seeking democratic reform that Musharraf had originally promised.
It seems like the only reason Musharaf is still president is because Bush adminstration likes him. However it sounds very weired democtraticly speaking. Why the US does not put a president merely because Pakistan likes him? shouldn't the president be representing his people and not a foreign will, or let's say, not a traitre? The US support of such leaders will be reflected on American as bad as it could be immagined. Musharaf should respond to his people wishes and leave office gor good.
If the people of Pakistan want a democracy than why not let them have it? Withdraw support from Musharraf. With that said what do we do to help prevent them from forming a government favorable to supporting terrorism?
The U.S. President directs a policy of certain persons being held incommunicado without due process, in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, secret CIA prisons in Europe, or Pakistan. This policy has been found to be ultra vires and illegal in by the Judiciaries of the United States, Europe, and Pakistan. Justice Chaudhry does not find a constitutional basis for persons to be held incommunicado without due process under Pakistan law, the majority of legal authorities hold the same view in the United States, Europe, and Pakistan. The request for the resignation of Justice Chaudhry probably orignated in the office of the U.S. President. Musharraf cooperates with Washington within the reasonable scope of that of an ally. Musharraf was handed a reference from the law minister, which he had a duty to forward to the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Whether the reference has sufficient facts to constitute an actionable basis for removal is something only the proceeding can disclose. Musharraf may well be an unwilling intermediate, between the pressure being applied by the U.S. President on the one hand, and the legal integrity of Justice Chaudhry on the other hand. Justice Chaudhry will not cooperate with with ultra-vires demands, conveyed by Musharraf or the Pakistan Intelligence Agencies originating in the office of the U.S. President. The U.S. President may have to withdraw his demands, as he withdrew other ultra-vires demands like the demands made of General Ashcroft which he refused to sign, and not interfere in the operation of the Pakistan Courts. The similarity between the U.S. Justice Department revolt under General Ashcroft and the Pakistan Judiciary revolt under Justice Chaudhry is striking in its similarity, with a high degree of probability that the instigator of both incidents is the U.S. President.
Musharraf is just another George Bush Puppet.
Musharaf is just another George Bush Puppet.
Pakistan is the epicenter of international terrorism and is the most dangerous country in the world.... it has weapons of mass destruction (no doubt about unlike iraq) ... it is ardent supporter of jihadist and other terror group especially those involved in terror against its neighbors.... and is completely unstable...the us should have invaded pakistan instead of iraq and taken away all of its nuclear weapons....
I wonder about our blind support for the dictator Musharraf. Specifically, I wonder if it will be as much of a long-term success for us as our support of The Shah of Iran, Saddam Hussien in the 1980's, Batista of Cuba, or Diem of S. Vietnam.
Sahenshah, you are obvously an uneducated hooligan who likes to make baseless attacks on the President of the United States. zharris, The US has never gone anywhere to tell people how to run their govt. completely unwelcome as much as some in the Middle East will claim..Even with Iraq, as much as some pollsters claim that the majority there want us to leave, I would love for there to be an actual national vote and then see what the Iraqi people really want. Honestly, we should call some of these people's bluff. Whenever the US does take a step back and say "your problem," it gets chastised and then when it comes to help, welcomed by the people they are helping, they're again chastised. With Pakistan however, after 9/11, it was well within the US rights to hold their feet to the fire..they have been complicit in much of the harboring of terrorism..if any thing the US was and has been too nice to them, giving them chance after chance. Some will even argue that no, the US shouldn't tell them what to do but rather bomb the ---- out of them as an enemy state. So I guess pragmatically speaking, take your pick; whihc option do you think would have been better?
President Pervaiz Musharraf is the best leader Pakistan has seen from as long as I can remember. He has demonstrated his leadership without the use of force at his command, which is the powerful Pakistan Army. The Unity of the Pakistan's Generals in Musharraf's support is absolutely Admirable because as long as the Country's Army stands together, nothing can harm the Country. Pakistan's public, however is pathetic when it comes to their political choices. They choose to be fooled by the same people (Bay Nazir & Nawaz Shriff groups) over and over again. Long live President Musharraf and may God's hand be upon him & protect him.
To those excusing our support of a brutal military dictator in Musharraf as our best option, I say it was obvious in 2003 and more obvious today that continued support for brutal military dictator Saddam Hussein was our best option in Iraq. What we have now in Iraq is a disaster. And Musharraf is overthrown, we'll have on in Pakistan and they are a nuclear power. This administration is inept at foreign poilcy with the three stooges (Bush, Cheney, and Rice) at its head. But don't forget the other fools including Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.
I think, at present, Mr. Musharraf is the best choice. Yes! he made a big mistake in removing the CJ. I do not agree with this decision and some of his other policies. We definitely, do not need another episode of Benazir or Nawaz. Both were very corrupt and looted the country with both hands.
My family suffers every day from Dubbya's failed foreign policies but the reality is this: All US presidents are involved in foreign policy because it effects us - especially now! Our US leadership's failure to get engaged in the early twentieth century helped the Mid East and the rest of the spice road evolve via the Great Game of the British and The Russians. The Madrasas in Pakistan created the Taliban. They are there because we did not get engaged in real foreign policy with the Saudis or the Pakistanis in the 80's and 90's. I'm not excusing this but the reality is this. Moderate muslims do not stand up for moderation. They sit idly by while extremists warp the world view of a beautiful religion. Until moderate muslims stand up for their religion and it's wonderful possibilities, Extremists Will Continue To Rule Islam. Lebanon will fail, Iraq will fail, Palestine will fail and ultimately Pakistan will fail because the Extremist minorities will rule. They build schools to educate the poor and the moderates do nothing, allowing another generation of extremists to be created. They do nothing because they stay away from their own poor and impoverished peoples because, like Americans poverty scares them. Stand up for moderate Islam and start by helping your own poor and then we will stay out of your business. Until then, I want the nukes and terrorists to stay where you made them and I will support a US government that works to do that.
Despite all his flaws Musharraf is the best person to rule Pakistan. If he goes away, Jihadists will come to power, nukes will get into hands of Jihadists and the situation would be horrible. I feel sorry for the freedom loving Pakistanis, but the truth is that not every country is meant to be a democracy. Pakistan is a chaostic state. Only dictators like Musharraf can bring some order to the chaos.
Musharraf is indeed in a lot of trouble right now, but according to the American media he has been in "trouble" since 2001. You folks are simply addicted to crisis.
Morons say things like "Musharraf is just another George Bush Puppet". If he was, we'd have bin Laden by now. That would bring up Bush's approval ratings and he knows it. Ron isn't very bright!
The US is continuing to support terror within degenerate nations like Pakistan so that the US can continue trying to put a good face on its "war against terrorism".
In disagreement with Dr.V.N.Rao,Toronto and in agreement with Kurt Oswald,Santee,Ca.I will start quoting Dr.V.N.Rao (but then deviating from his quote) " It is high time that the U.S.(Government) sends an ambiguous message to the world ",that it now has the Greatest Evil Empire,since the Roman Empire existed,with the U.S. now occupying 130 countries in the world (with most of them to protect their,by us established Puppett Governments,which would fall the minute our troops leave),to "teach " them our so-called (Fake)"Democracy",where this and that party is forbidden,these and those Candidates are excluded,and so called "elections" are forced upon those people under the nose of our troops,ect.Even in our beloved Country America a Candidate has absolutely no chance of being elected(Republican or Democrat alike)unless he or she clearly states that he or she is Pro-Israel(being "Pro-America" doesn`t matter at all).Of course,we are a Colony of Israel,and have been so for many years,always executing Israels demands dictated to our Governments by their Agents and Spies in our Country AIPAC,the "Anti-Defamation League ect.I believe that every American should read the book " Rogue State" by William Blum,it may open their eyes,unless they wear blinders like horses that allows them to see only in one direction,or keep repeating like parrots what our Israeli News Media keeps telling them over and over again.But there is absolutely no doubt in my mind,that our "Great Evil Empire" will wind up with the same fate,as the Roman Empire did.The first signs are already there for some time,but since I am 83 years old,I won`t see it.I only feel very,very sorry for our children and grandchildren,and all of our brave troops who died and got maimed for life in vain,not fighting for our beloved Country America,but for a totally foreign,most terrorist,and Internationally outlawed country Israel(who doesn`t even have one single soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan to support our troops).Greetings from San Diego,California
If you know Pakistan well, everybody should support President Musharaf, as all other politician are corrupt and next phase of leaders who are Islamic are totally confused. Give him a chance; he is doing his best to fix Pakistan. Its sad but true, due to a very low Literacy rate, only rule which is successful in Pakistan is a President with its Military backing. He is the guaranteed solution to prevent Religious extremism globally in the long run, just Like Pres Mubarak of Egypt, might not be the ideal leaders, but can do a whole lot of good in controlling religious extremism.
I get the feeling that all the Americans that would like to get rid of Musharif are the same people that think our war in Iraq is "illegal" but somehow think that we should go into sudan.
Musharraf is an American backed dictator in the same way that Noriega was in Panama. He is just another puppet in the likes of Osaman Binladen. This is nothing new, there are puppets galore and it should be to no surprise to anyone. This is the way of the world. The strong use the weak and the weak let themselves be used in an attempt to become strong. It rarely works as planned. When you make a deal with the devil, sooner or later you have to hold his tale and he does his bussiness all over you. Lets not be hipocritical, lets call it how it is, everyone falls in one of the two categories at one point or another. We come back to Binladen, he got used and abused, dejected and rejected he had to hold the tail and we got splattered as well. Going back to the current U.S. puppet, Musharraf represents to Pakistan its own buffer, in turn allowing for stability in the region, in any case India is next door and the Muslim Extremist will have to deal with them first if they were ever to take control of Pakistan. The latter would spell disaster and forget about Israel and the rest of the world as we know it.
Dear Jack: I understand your frustration. We all have it in us, but it is not as simple as you put it. If you look at Musharraf closely, you can almost see that he is a clone and not a real person and the example you give, provides proof that politics is the dirties word in existance.
Musharraf is an American backed dictator in the same way that Noriega was in Panama. He is just another puppet in the likes of Osaman Binladen. This is nothing new, there are puppets galore and it should be to no surprise to anyone. This is the way of the world. The strong use the weak and the weak let themselves be used in an attempt to become strong. It rarely works as planned. When you make a deal with the devil, sooner or later you have to hold his tale and he does his bussiness all over you. Lets not be hipocritical, lets call it how it is, everyone falls in one of the two categories at one point or another. We come back to Binladen, he got used and abused, dejected and rejected he had to hold the tail and we got splattered as well. Going back to the current U.S. puppet, Musharraf represents to Pakistan its own buffer, in turn allowing for stability in the region, in any case India is next door and the Muslim Extremist will have to deal with them first if they were ever to take control of Pakistan. The latter would spell disaster and forget about Israel and the rest of the world as we know it.
I want to echo Jack Waldrop-thank you! If only the President could make a puppet out of Musharaaf, life would have been so much easier. Unfortunately it hasn't been easy working with them-yet it's the only choice we have I guess. Pakistan and Musharaaf, can't live with them and can't live without them.
Pres.Musharaf is great pakistani, if there was a complaint by a judge against the ch.justice filled what should he do. now refrence is in the court, let the court decide if chief justice has done anything wrong or not. Chief Justice should have faith on judiciary system and on other judges. he should have stop working by himself and should have asked for an enquiry. once cleared from alligation he should have resumed his job again instead of politizing the matter and left a suspeciousness of being a biast in future to favor one or two political parties if he come back. these parties past is questionable anyway i am sure Pres. Musharaf did the right thing to let the other judges to decide.
In response to Khwaja Khusro Tariq, Karachi, Pakistan: I have been to pakistan 2 times in last 4 years and do not agree that people are longing for nawaz sharif or benazir (two corrupt rulers who brought pakistan close to be declared a failed state). In the last 5 years not a single significant demonstration was staged in support of nawaz sharif and benazir. Following are just a few achievements of Musharaf and his government. 1) For the first time in 20 years, the current government will complete the full 5 year term. Previous governments were sacked for corruptions, misuse of powers etc. 2) The number of news and media channels are increased from a single state-run PTV to over 15 private/public channels - thanks to the open media policy of this government. This is another reason why we are getting detailed coverage of whats happening in pakistan, which in previous governments went uncovered. 3) Established local government system in the country which world bank termed as a 'silent revolution'. Now every city has a mayor with full administrative, financial independence. In 2005, mayor of karachi was among the world's top 10 outstanding mayors. http://www.worldmayor.com/index.html 4) Took are bold stand against extremism that was flourishing in pakistan's society, resulting in three assassination attempts. 5) Being a student, what i admire the most is his education policy and creation of HEC (higher education commision). http://www.hec.gov.pk/new/index.htm Realizing the importance of education, this commision has provided countless scholarships for higher education. It would be wrong to say that there are more scholarships than there are students willing to take them. Finally regarding the removal of chief justice, this issue is a purely legal issue and is currently being heard in the supreme court of pakistan. However political parties are trying to use this legal issue for their political purposes thereby creating unrest in the country. After all it was nawaz sharif who ordered an attack on the supreme court of pakistan on Nov 28, 1997.
I think Musharraf is one of the best leaders Pakistan has had for a really long time. The problem with Pakistan has always been not being able to handle corruption because those corrupt seek shelter under a political battle and therefore the country can never fight its politicians, chief justices or feudal lords. Musharraf has taken a stand and if he wins the country will suffer from less corruption in the future.
although musharraf has made some bad decisions recently ,but he is far more better for the pakistani nation.we have seen all the corrupt politicans from benazir bhutto to nawaz sharif who almost bring the country to bankrupcy.To the (chief justice and opposition parties) shares the blood on their shoulder along with mqm for killing 50 people on may 12th.
Apex court urged to rectify past mistakes: Validation of unconstitutional measures http://www.dawn.com/2007/05/31/top1.htm Pakistan near bottom of peace index: study http://www.dawn.com/2007/05/31/top12.htm http://www.insaf.org.pk
There are now 300 million Americans. Out of this, there are approximately 45 million hispanics, 40 million blacks, 13 million asians and 7 million jews. I suggest that we allow exactly 7 million arab-muslims into this country so there are exactly the same number of arabs here as jews. By doing this, we will balance the political spectrum and be more likely to have positive relations with the REST of the middle east!
We love Musharaf. people make mistaks but his performance is extra ordinary and exceptional, we can accept democracy and other leaders but only under his suppervision. unfortunatly this is because of politicians old record.
He is a dictator. But in other hand he is the best option Pakistan has. All that money he got and getting from US is not a small chunk. I hope one day Pakistan truely will democracy but I don't think they ever will because of the curruption.
Saying that Musharraf is the best or only leader that Pakistan can come up with right now is just code for “we just don’t want another Muslem state.” Musharraf is a puppet.
It is indeed amusing to read the criticism that the US is hypocritical in discouraging democracy in Pakistan while allegedly encouraging it in Iraq.What is really hypocritical is espousing that we have a democracy in the US.Does anyone honestly believe that this administration believes in democracy?The Gore -Bush eelction controversy,warrantless spying on our citizens,assertions of executive privilege to hide behind,dismissal of US attorneys for political reasons,increasing the number of forces in IRAQ when the public has clearly voted aginst same in the last congressional elections,the legitimizing of torture,the disclosure of CIA undercover operatives for political benefit,etc.So before we hand wring over the lack of democracy in pakistan,lets get our own house in order.
It is indeed amusing to read the criticism that the US is hypocritical in discouraging democracy in Pakistan while allegedly encouraging it in Iraq.What is really hypocritical is espousing that we have a democracy in the US.Does anyone honestly believe that this administration believes in democracy?The Gore -Bush eelction controversy,warrantless spying on our citizens,assertions of executive privilege to hide behind,dismissal of US attorneys for political reasons,increasing the number of forces in IRAQ when the public has clearly voted aginst same in the last congressional elections,the legitimizing of torture,the disclosure of CIA undercover operatives for political benefit,etc.So before we hand wring over the lack of democracy in pakistan,lets get our own house in order.
Mr. Musharraf is about 65 years and still running the military, and would do any thing and every thing to keep the seat! This whole judicial crisis has been a true night-mare for this military junta, and hopefully this will bring this dirty house down and there will be true and free elections in pakistan and the exiled leaders will participate.
Mr. Musharraf is about 65 years and still running the military, and would do any thing and every thing to keep the seat! This whole judicial crisis has been a true night-mare for this military junta, and hopefully this will bring this dirty house down and there will be true and free elections in pakistan and the exiled leaders will participate.
I think dictatorship is directly related to terrorism. All the countries which has dictatorship is prone to terrorism. In dictatorship people feel that they are not part of the government and have no voice in the government and thay become terrorist.That is what happening in Muslim contries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt,Pakistan etc. Take the case of neibouring India which has the second largest muslim popualation and yet they never become terrorists. US is doing a mistake in supporting dictators like Mushraf on one hand and preach about democracy arround the world. This is a shame for the US.
I am a Canadian in my mid twenties who follows world affairs quite closely. I look at the state of affairs and how this world is like an aresol can in the fire ready to blow at any minute. I fear by the end of my time, we shall exist in a much more polarized society and worry the only way I will die a free man is in a war, or by an act of terrorism. I find myself deeply regretful about bringing a child into this world for fear of what they might have to endure after my time. The sad reality is that given the choice so called "democratic" muslim countries elect extremeists into power: Hezbollah, Hamas, Ahmadinejad, and well Bashir al-asad if you can call any part of that recent election democratic. Pakistan is a nuclear power and it would be my hope that Musharraf would rule for as long as I live. Quite simply not a reality and I cringe when I think of what or who will rule after him. The world is not always the way we would like it to be, so we just have to do the best with what we have.
Id hate to say it but Musharraf is at present the best choice, as I cant say a "good" choice. What people dont seem to understand is that a democracy movement might not create a peaceful atmosphere or better resolve for human rights. Let us not forget that Sadam Hussein was crushed, and they Iraqi people didnt birth a western democracy. To quote a white house official, "We thought we were going to birth an American style democracy... at this point we would be happy with a Romanian style democracy." In Iraq the people have choosen to bring about an Islamic state that is turning into a Shiah state. The Palestinians, after 50 years of Israel trying to force them to adopt a democratic, pluralistic government have choosen to first be governed by the Fatah terrorist and now by the Hamas terrorist. Becareful what you ask for, mind what they will ask for... you just might get it.
Musharraf is going down the same way his predesessors (Ayub Khan,and Zia Ul Haq) went after their long and draconian hold on the Pakistani nation. The unravelling of the Mush regime started March 9th 2007 when his so called "enlightened moderation" was exposed and the Chief Justice of that country was given a "dressing down" to either come in line or "leave" The people rallied around a figure who refused the "generals orders" and the dynamics of the country changed to the delight of the Pakistani middle class joined by all sections of the society. The whole drama of democracy was again exposed when the thugs of an ethnic party supporting Musharraf were let loose on unarmed supporters of the Chief Justice welcoming him to Karachi where he was to speak at the Karachi Bar Association. The last straw seems to have been the clamping down on the Live broadcasts from the media and banning the launch of a book on the Military's Business involvemenst in Pakistan.
To all the people that are saying things like, "let the people decide if they want Musharraf", and "get the army out of power", etc. I agree...in a PERFECT world, it would be a total democracy, with one vote for one person, and majority rule. But it doesn't even work that way here in the U.S., does it? Does anybody remember that Bush LOST the popular vote, and that he's still the one sitting in the big chair? But back to my point....yes, in a perfect world, Pakistan [among other countries] would be a total democracy, and the army would stay out of politics. But it's NOT a perfect world, so let's deal with reality - in 1999, Pakistan was on the verge of political and financial collapse; the infrastructure was non existant, and there was no hope, and very little freedom for the population when Musharraf took power --- which by the way, was not his intent, he was basically told by his generals, after Sharif essentially tried to assasinate him, along with approximately 200+ innocent civilians, that he was now in charge. Since then, Musharraf has been doing his best to correct 50+ years of mis-management by past administrations. Is he making EVERYONE happy? No. Does EVERYONE have a job? No. Has he solved ALL the problems? No. Is it better than it was 10 years ago? YES! Currently, there are new roads, electrical grids, sewer systems, communications networks, freeways and railways being built in Pakistan. When the country separated from India, there was a huge migration towards this new nation, with little, or no thought given to day-to-day operations. Karachi [the biggest city, and main port] is nothing but a cluster of fishing villages that had a major metropolis thrown on top of them. It is chaotic at best. Pakistan is a third-world country that is frantically trying to catch up with modern technology and ideals. Pakistan is a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into 21st century democracy, and that is what is happening right now --- but at least with Musharraf at the helm, people have the RIGHT and the ABILITY to kick and scream publicly without being lined up at the edge of a pit and shot in the back. Pakistan is one of the only Islamic countries where you can walk around with a sign shouting "Go Musharraf Go". If you tried that in many other U.S.-allied countries such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, etc....you would be dragged away on the spot - never to be heard from again. I do not envy President Musharraf's position. It would be much easier for him to be like most past Pakistani leaders - take the money and run. But he is sticking it out, taking the heat, and trying to do his best for his country. Is it "perfect"? Again, no. But it is the best we can hope for right now. As for those that say "let the people decide"..... They decided in Palestine [as is their right], and Hamas took power. So, okay.....let's have the Pakistani people decide, and then see who ends up with their finger on the Islamic nuclear button. If it were MY choice, I'd rather have that resposibility stay right where it is for now --- at least Musharraf thinks of repercussion in this life, rather than martyrdom in the next.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=209473

Syndicate This Site

Add World Blog to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google

Interactive

Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political power plays in and around Iraq during a briefing of the region led by NBC’s Richard Engel.